The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 3, 2013, 12:09 PM   #1
thesheepdog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2010
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 1,991
5.56 chamber shows more velocity than wylde chamber

I have been testing a mk262 clone for weeks and here are some interesting results from the two guns I used to test velocity.

Gun #1:
16" barrel, 5.56 NATO chamber, 5R rifling, melonite treated.

Gun #2:
16" barrel, .223 wylde chamber, 3R rifling, melonite treated.

The velocity on the 5.56 was about 100fps faster than the .223 wylde;consistently higher.

Average velocity of the 5.56 chamber was 2665fps with a high of 2680 and a low of 2650.

The .223 wylde experienced much lower velocities.
Average was 2550fps with a high of 2570 and a low of 2530.

Thoughts? Comments?

All of the ammo was loaded the same.
thesheepdog is offline  
Old February 4, 2013, 02:20 AM   #2
highbrow
Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 92
Might be the 5.56 chamber has more freebore, 2.550 vs ?2.430 for the Wylde. Just a thought.
__________________
Mosin: Know the safety, Love the safety, Be the safety

There are some corners of this country which have bred the most terrible things, things that act against everything we believe in. They must be fought. FBHO- Free Edward Snowden
highbrow is offline  
Old February 4, 2013, 07:40 AM   #3
Mobuck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 2,225
There is little/no correlation between different barrels since the are simply too many variables. One bore might be slightly smoother or slightly tighter/looser or one rifling might create more drag. Even two identical rifles might show a significant difference in actual velocity with identical ammo.
Mobuck is offline  
Old February 4, 2013, 02:25 PM   #4
Cavitation
Member
 
Join Date: February 3, 2013
Posts: 21
My money is on the rifling difference.
Cavitation is offline  
Old February 4, 2013, 02:31 PM   #5
thesheepdog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2010
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 1,991
They're both 1:8 twist. Black hole weaponry claims their 3R barrels offer velocity increase. I don't know if it's the chamber or the rifling.
thesheepdog is offline  
Old February 6, 2013, 10:12 PM   #6
AR15barrels
Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 53
1 sample of each chamber type is hardly enough sample size to make real conclusions.
The only conclusion you can make is that one barrel is faster than the other.
It probably has nothing to do with the throat.
AR15barrels is offline  
Old February 6, 2013, 11:53 PM   #7
KO3422
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2011
Posts: 124
Agreed, I wish we had more barrels to test. It's probably the rifling difference.
KO3422 is offline  
Old February 18, 2013, 08:16 PM   #8
bfoosh006
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 17, 2009
Posts: 346
thesheepdog.... you might find this interesting...http://www.leverguns.com/articles/ballisticians.htm


To sum it up.... not all guns are "equal".

Look at the "S&W M19 #3" and "Colt Python #1"
bfoosh006 is offline  
Old February 19, 2013, 08:10 PM   #9
jglsprings
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2009
Posts: 1,467
Reloads or factory ammunition?

Bullet seated on the lands or off?

Two many variables to make your claim.
__________________
Let's eat Grandma.
Let's eat, Grandma.

Commas save lives...

Last edited by jglsprings; February 20, 2013 at 08:18 AM.
jglsprings is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08387 seconds with 9 queries