The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 29, 2013, 09:34 PM   #1
Prof Young
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2007
Posts: 638
Savage O/U model 42

Shooters:
I really like what I'm reading about the new Savage 42 with the 22 cal rifle barrel over a 410 ga scatter gun barrel. Seems like the perfect combination of ammo for squirrel hunting and it could well be my next purchase. Anyone out there have real experience with one?
Live well, be safe
Prof Young
Prof Young is offline  
Old January 29, 2013, 10:17 PM   #2
Stukaman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2010
Posts: 100
I have the original version the Stevens .22/.410 was my grandmas love that rifle good enough for the stew pot!
Stukaman is offline  
Old January 30, 2013, 06:38 PM   #3
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,371
I have an older Model 24 s/e 22/410 I've had for a long time.

The first two years I lived in Alaska I lived in a little cabin north of Healy. I worked for the railroad in the summer and was laid off in the winter.

I pretty much fed my young family with that gun, snowshoe rabbits and ptarmigan.

If for some reason I had to get rid of all my guns, that would be the last one to go.

Not a glamorous as most guns, but functional, reliable, and I know with it I could always eat.

Don't know about the Savage 42, but if its anything like the 24, its will worth keeping in any gun stable.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School Oct '78
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old January 31, 2013, 10:42 PM   #4
stu925
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 942
I've got an old Savage 24 also and think it's a great gun. Perfect for chasing small game with the .22/.410 chamberings. The 42 is the update version of the Model 24, I expect it should provide years of service for you and should also make a great small game gun.

Stu
stu925 is offline  
Old February 3, 2013, 06:28 AM   #5
Pfletch83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2012
Posts: 147
I've been looking at the Model 42 and can see the usefulness of such a firearm.

Plus the .410 barrel seems to be cylinder choke ( I could be wrong) but that would give it a good capability to use with '000' buck and slugs.

Last edited by Pfletch83; February 3, 2013 at 06:34 AM.
Pfletch83 is offline  
Old February 3, 2013, 07:38 AM   #6
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Starkville, MS (new to MS)
Posts: 4,669
Quote:
use with '000' buck and slugs.
Both 000 buck and slugs are totally useless in a .410 outside of just a few yards and especially on any game.
Doyle is offline  
Old February 4, 2013, 06:27 PM   #7
Picher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,726
I had a Mod 24 O/U in .22/20 gauge and it wasn't ideal for my uses, which included grouse and woodcock, jump-shooting ducks along small streams and other small game.

The sights were terrible, the .22LR barrel wasn't that accurate and the 20 gauge barrel threw an extra-full pattern. Because it had a rifle barrel, it was illegal for hunting ducks.

I found it was too slow to cock for flushing grouse.
__________________
People are like rifles. Some are tried and true, having great eyes, personality, and fun to be with. Others never seem to hit the mark with you. Still others go off half-cocked. Still, it's nice to know most of them.
Picher is offline  
Old February 4, 2013, 10:03 PM   #8
idek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 2009
Posts: 579
Quote:
Quote:
use with '000' buck and slugs.
Both 000 buck and slugs are totally useless in a .410 outside of just a few yards and especially on any game.
Careful there Doyle. Pfletch will argue till he's blue in the face defending the .410's capabilities.

As for the initial topic, I haven't shot a 42 but handled one in a store for a while. My initial impression was that it felt and looked like a toy (i.e. cheap). The sights did not impress me at all, and the ergonomics didn't seem great. With the crude sights, I don't think it would be a great .22, and with the short (20"), lightweight barrels, it didn't feel like it would handle well as a wingshooting shotgun.

I'd like to see a company try a combination gun weighing between 6.5 and 7 pounds with low profile aperture sights to improve aiming precision with the rifle/slugs and slightly longer barrels (24" maybe, which I think is what the older 24s had) to improve barrel movement on flying targets.

As for calibers, I'd like to see a .357/20 gauge (with choke tubes) option. .38 specials could be used on small game without blowing them up, 357's could be used on varmints/predators and smaller deer out to 100 yards or better. Slugs could take larger deer out to around 75 yards. And 20 gauge shot shells could drop anything from woodcock to turkey with the right choke and ammo. Of course, getting a gun to shoot all that to same POI probably couldn't happen.

Last edited by idek; February 4, 2013 at 10:13 PM.
idek is offline  
Old March 10, 2013, 06:02 PM   #9
pathdoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 377
I've also looked at the 42 (again without having had the chance to fire it).

Everything impressed me except (a) the extractor/ejector assembly feels like plastic and (b) the sights are awful. The first one isn't a deal-breaker for me, but the second certainly is.

If this thing could be scoped easily, I would possibly reconsider. But the sights are as much the heart of the system as the barrel is. If they suck, the whole thing sucks, yes?
pathdoc is offline  
Old March 10, 2013, 06:47 PM   #10
hodaka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,819
Not to extend an argument but my first deer was with a .410 that my dad had emptied the 6 shot from a 3 inch shell and reloaded with #1 buck. I would not recommend but I was a young child at the time. The 9 point ran about 20 yards. He has been on the wall for the past 50 years. A .410 will kill.
hodaka is offline  
Old March 11, 2013, 09:35 AM   #11
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Starkville, MS (new to MS)
Posts: 4,669
Quote:
A .410 will kill.
So will a .22LR. You owe it to your game to give him a sure and quick kill, not a lingering death.
Doyle is offline  
Old March 11, 2013, 08:36 PM   #12
Adventurer 2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2006
Posts: 510
Just my opinion - limit your .410 slug shots to bow distances (30ish yards) and even the big bucks will drop on the spot.
My take on the the Savage 42 - Overpriced (Wal-Mart sells for $370).
Crude sights - someday, I'm going to look into getting them replaced.
You read it here first - the trigger is pathetic. Not the pull but the design. The upper part of the trigger pivots into the frame of the gun so your trigger finger has to slide down the trigger when you pull it unless you place your finger at the very end of the trigger (never seen this before).
I think it is just a matter of time before Savage drops this rifle from the lineup (if it wer $200ish - might be a different story) -All said - I would buy one again just because of the single shot .410 and single shot 22LR I owned as a kid. Now I have both rolled into one, slender, lightweight package.

Adventurer 2 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08420 seconds with 9 queries