The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 1, 2012, 10:15 AM   #1
Sturmgewehre
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,212
The new GSG StG44 Rifle

During SHOT Show 2012 I ran across the then prototype GSG StG44 .22LR rifle. Here's the video from SHOT.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FgSVw7zfmQ

I placed my order as soon as distributors started taking orders. The rifle arrived last week and so far it looks and feels very similar to the prototype I handled at SHOT, however I did notice a few minor changes to the rifle. The charging handle how has a return spring and the wood buttstock isn't glossed like the prototype but instead is simply stained. There are a few other minor changes but I won't go into all of them.

The rifle is made of cast metal and stampings. It has the heft and feel of a real StG44, it does not feel like a .22LR rifle at all. The new StG44 a step above the quality of their MP5 clones, IMHO. This rifle is so hefty it tips the scales at 9.7lbs!



The first rifles to come into the country will ship in a wooden crate. What I was told at SHOT what that the crates would not come with the rifle after the first shipment. I don't know if this has changed.

The wooden crate is nicely made and goes great with the rifle.



Inside the crate you will find the rifle stored with the buttstock removed and all of the components wrapped in plastic. The rifle and stock are held securely in place with wooden slots that are screwed down and have spray foam padding them.



Once you get the rifle out of the crate it's a simple matter of sliding the stock onto the receiver and inserting the supplied take down pin into its proper hole. At that point the rifle is ready for action.



The detail is stunning on the rifle. All of the reinforcement ribs and rivets that exist on the original WWII sheet metal rifle are replicated in exacting detail on the GSG rifle. I've had the pleasure of inspecting a real WWII era StG44 and I can say, this is a VERY close facsimile.



Field stripping the GSG rifle is accomplished the same way as you would field strip an original rifle. You push the take down pin out, remove the buttstock, swing the pistol grip/trigger group down and pull the bolt and carrier along with the associated springs and small parts out of the rear.

__________________
Visit my YouTube channel for reviews, tests and more.
Ex Mea Sententia

Last edited by Sturmgewehre; November 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM.
Sturmgewehre is offline  
Old November 1, 2012, 10:16 AM   #2
Sturmgewehre
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,212
The bolt and carrier are very similar to a .22 conversion kit for an AR-15. It's a self contained unit that looks fairly well built. All of the components of the bolt and carrier are made of metal.



The rifle includes a single 24 round polymer magazine that also seems fairly well built. It inserts and locks into place just like the original WWII era rifle.



The rifle features cast metal sights which again are very close in design to the original WWII era sights. The rear sight is slightly different in that it features a RPK style windage adjustment system. You can dial in windage by turning the small wheel on the left side of the sights which then moves the rear blade either right or left. I suspect this was done because the front sight is cast solid and is not windage adjustable.



The rifles have hit their target price retail of $599 which as of right now includes the wooden crate at no extra charge. If you shop around it should be possible to find these at $550 or less.

Stay tuned for a full shooting review to be posted on my YouTube channel: http://www.military-arms.com
__________________
Visit my YouTube channel for reviews, tests and more.
Ex Mea Sententia
Sturmgewehre is offline  
Old November 1, 2012, 10:25 AM   #3
h2otoo
Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 2012
Posts: 77
Sweet. I just (yesterday) picked up a GSG 5, used. It seems like it will be a fun shooter. The StG44 looks great. Waiting for the range report!
Bob
h2otoo is offline  
Old November 1, 2012, 10:33 AM   #4
MJ1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2008
Posts: 327
;)

Thank you for the report. I knew some day someone would see this as a great project.

Would you post a full profile picture?

..MJ..

__________________
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading"
--Unknown Soldier--
Bravery is being the only one who knows you're afraid.
- David Hackworth -

Last edited by MJ1; November 1, 2012 at 10:40 AM.
MJ1 is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 11:41 AM   #5
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Western WA
Posts: 5,630
I got mine a week ago, and shot it for the first time, yesterday. It really is a beautiful rifle. Beauty is, as beauty does, right?
The elevation markings on the rear sight appear to be based on historical fidelity, rather than useability. To get the rifle on paper at 20 yards, I had to set the rear sight for 700 yards. It's not really an issue, other than the sight stands very high on the gun already, and appears sort of exposed when set for high elevation. The sight also had to be cranked way to the left to get rounds centered on target.

Sight-in consumed 30 rounds of Federal and CCI ammo, and the gun ran fine.
The baptism by fire was a steel-plate match, shot at distances of 20-60 feet. Not really accuracy intensive, as the smallest targets were 8" plates.
I started having functional issues, almost from the first match stage. Each of the six courses of fire required a minimum of 30 rounds, and in the first four CoFs, I don't know that I was able to fire even twenty rounds in a row without a malfunction. I'll provide one example: After completing a CoF, on the unload command I removed the mag and a live round fell out of the magwell. I retracted the bolt, and found a spent case in the port, and a live round in the chamber! It went like this for about 100 rounds.

Then, I got through the last two CoFs - 50 rounds - without a single functional issue, so maybe it was the much cussed/discussed "break-in" in action?

One problem that existed throughout the day, was the gun's inability to extract live rounds. I suspect the gun would run OK without an extractor, as some blowback rimfires do, but when it came time to unload the gun, I was picking-out the live round with my fingernail.

The gun is very fun to shoot. It's heavy - well over nine pounds - but the weight is between the hands, so it doesn't feel heavy or clunky. The thumb safety works "backwards", rotated by the thumb (right-handers) through a fairly long arc, up and to to the rear for "fire". Applying the safety is an easy, down/forward rotation.

The trigger is OK. It has fairly long travel, but it's not heavy, rough, or with any stacking or staging.

I am so accustomed to shooting with ghost ring/peep style rear sights, that the Stg sights took some real getting used to; a vee notch and pyramid front, but they were very usable for quick shooting at close range.
Claw-style scope mounts for HK rifles will apparently mount on the Stg without issues, but those that I've seen mount the scope much too high to get any sort of cheek weld while shooting. A mount that I saw in Shotgun News appears to locate the scope rail close to the top of the receiver, but I haven't seen any pics of that rail mounted on anything.

I'll strip/clean/inspect the gun today, and see if there's anything obviously wrong with the extractor. I certainly don't fancy sending the gun back to Germany for repair; does ATI have a U.S. repair facility?
RickB is online now  
Old November 11, 2012, 02:16 PM   #6
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 16,594
MJ1 - how'd you get the paddle release on your HK?
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Old November 13, 2012, 05:42 AM   #7
meatgrinder42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Good Ol' Wisconsin
Posts: 327
Quote:
how'd you get the paddle release on your HK?
There are a few companies that will do it. I think Arizona Gun works is one, it came to mind right away. Otherwise if you're careful you can do it yourself, but if you do it wrong you've made a machine gun by ATF thought process.

As for the STG .22 I've been itching to get one bad. I saw one at an ace hardware a month or so ago and quickly informed people to check it out. I was really impressed with it and the wooden locker it comes in is just plain cool... I'm jealous.
__________________
When I die better bury me deep, two .45s layin' at my feet,
An M16 across my chest, tell Chesty Puller I did my best
meatgrinder42 is offline  
Old November 15, 2012, 02:00 PM   #8
Ridge_Runner_5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,852
I like that they ditched their clumsy block bolt assembly in favor of what looks to be a modified Ciener bolt.

But I want to say that 9lbs 7oz is not 9.7lbs

A pound is 16 ounces. So 7 ounces would be approximately .4 pounds.
Ridge_Runner_5 is offline  
Old November 16, 2012, 10:43 AM   #9
Que
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 876
I just acquired one of these and will be shooting it for the first time this coming Wednesday. I have never been all that impressed with most of the 22 "clones" even finding one of GSG's other offerings, the MP5, to be rather Airsoft feeling. I found my SIG 522 to feel more like the real thing, but the STG 44 nails the feel of the original. I've been around the real McCoy and GSG got this one right. Now that the STG44 has been introduced next comes the MP40.

The only thing is that it is "only" a 22, but it will see a lot more rounds that way than it would if if it was 7.92 Kurz.
Que is offline  
Old November 16, 2012, 05:57 PM   #10
Come and take it.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 999
having a hard time with my dealers down in Kentucky.

The distributers they are using don't have them in stock yet.
Come and take it. is offline  
Old November 16, 2012, 07:12 PM   #11
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Western WA
Posts: 5,630
I emailed ATI about the sight settings, and they said the intent was that the "700m" setting should correspond to 70 feet. I suppose that makes sense, but who'd sight-in a rifle for 20 (200m) or 30 (300m) feet? I'd like it to be "on" at 50 yards without having to use-up all of the available adjustment. A guy on another forum put a washer between the rear sight and its base, and that made the elevation adjustment range more useable.
RickB is online now  
Old November 16, 2012, 07:12 PM   #12
2damnold4this
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 1,274
Would you buy it if they made it in 7.62x39 and it took AK magazines?
2damnold4this is offline  
Old November 16, 2012, 07:34 PM   #13
jhenry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,813
I would in a heartbeat.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer
jhenry is offline  
Old November 17, 2012, 12:45 PM   #14
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Western WA
Posts: 5,630
Quote:
Would you buy it if they made it in 7.62x39 and it took AK magazines?
The Stg44 and it's mags won't accommodate 7.62x39. I can't imagine there would be any market for a rare, historical gun redesigned for the sake of cheap ammo.
RickB is online now  
Old November 17, 2012, 04:26 PM   #15
Ridge_Runner_5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,852
Quote:
I can't imagine there would be any market for a rare, historical gun redesigned for the sake of cheap ammo.
In a thread about a .22 caliber German assault rifle clone
Ridge_Runner_5 is offline  
Old November 17, 2012, 06:52 PM   #16
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Western WA
Posts: 5,630
That's the whole point, right? A rimfire clone. A Stg44 in 7.62x39 wouldn't be a clone of anything. 7.62x39 won't fit.
RickB is online now  
Old November 18, 2012, 04:16 AM   #17
raftman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,889
Quote:
The Stg44 and it's mags won't accommodate 7.62x39. I can't imagine there would be any market for a rare, historical gun redesigned for the sake of cheap ammo.
It's not at all uncommon for designs to be rescaled to all sorts of cartridges. Think about how many calibers 1911-style pistols come in.

Or the G3-style roller-delayed blowback action, which has been scaled to 9x19, 5.56/.223, 7.62x39, 7.61x51/.308, and I am sure others.

The .22lr version certainly seems to be selling well, and that's a gun that only looks like the real deal.

A version that looks like, feels like, sounds like, and actually uses the same action (simply using a far more affordable and widely available cartridge) could prove very popular if the price were right.

Quote:
That's the whole point, right? A rimfire clone. A Stg44 in 7.62x39 wouldn't be a clone of anything...
A 7.62x39 version actually would be more of a clone than the .22lr gun. It is in fact the .22lr version that isn't a clone of anything, it is a straight blowback .22 designed only to look like the StG-44. A Sturmgewehr built around the Russian cartridge would work, feel, sound, etc more like the original than the GSG .22 version, which has itself already proven to be a decent seller.
__________________
"My momma, she done told me, there's heart and then there's hate
If one of 'em's inside of you, the other one, it aint."

Last edited by raftman; November 18, 2012 at 04:27 AM.
raftman is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 09:46 AM   #18
tulsamal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2004
Location: Vinita, OK
Posts: 2,454
If they got the urge to make it in centerfire... my vote would be to just go all original. Original cartridge, original mags. There is modern production 7.9 Kurz for sale. If a few thousand new rifles were produced in the chambering, I'm sure they could make more. And it doesn't seem like it would be especially difficult to reload if you could buy a few thousand new pieces of brass and an appropriately sized bullet.

Gregg
tulsamal is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 10:58 AM   #19
EdInk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2009
Posts: 3,954
IMHO a .22lr model will fill the niche for most people. ATI makes (distributes) some really nice .22 rifles. I have an original GSG that is super fun to shoot.
__________________
Sic Semper Tyrannis
EdInk is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 11:11 AM   #20
Amsdorf
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2011
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 849
My favorite LGS had one on the racks the other day and I was surprised by how heavy it was when they let me hold it, they said it is as heavy as the original. I was trying to think of a reason why I would want one and the answer I found scared me.

The only good reason for me to own one is because I would go out and buy a real one and want to use the .22LR for training/practice.

The gun shop even has the 8mm kurz rounds for the original STG, pretty fascinating cartridge to hold.

So, I'm avoiding the .22LR version for fear it will lead to thousands of dollars later getting a "real one."

Amsdorf is offline  
Old November 29, 2012, 06:18 PM   #21
Come and take it.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 999
Purchased one at Knob Creek. Very fun to shoot. good for ripping up soup cans.
Come and take it. is offline  
Old November 29, 2012, 06:59 PM   #22
oldsoonershooter
Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 40
Mine came in Monday and I took it to the range Tuesday. It shoots great. The first 50 rounds were Winchester and fed without fail. The next 50 were M22 and there were several feed issues. Then I went to CCI mini-mags and had no problems. Glad I got one and Bob's was a pleasure to work with.
__________________
Life member NRA
oldsoonershooter is offline  
Old November 29, 2012, 07:17 PM   #23
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 16,594
First time in years that I wanted a 22 rifle.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Old February 12, 2013, 01:46 PM   #24
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Western WA
Posts: 5,630
Anyone doing much shooting with theirs? I've been corresponding with a guy I "met" on youtube, about our mutual issue of our guns not extracting/ejecting live rounds.
I've put 200 rounds through my gun, with no functional issues at all over the last 100, but it has never extracted live rounds.
A buddy says failure to extract/eject live rounds is a chronic issue with some AR rimfire conversions, and the GSG bolt is apparently very similar to that in some AR conversions; I'm wondering if it's just par for the course?
RickB is online now  
Old February 12, 2013, 02:05 PM   #25
Venom1956
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 2,906
Never liked it in Call of Duty... Bring on the Thompson clone!
__________________
E-Shock rounds are engineered to expend maximum energy into soft targets, turning the density mass into an expanding rotational cone of NyTrilium matrix particles, causing neurological collapse to the central nervous system.- Yeah I can do that.
I guarantee you will know it if a bicyclist hits your house going 1000 mph.
Venom1956 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13454 seconds with 9 queries