The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 19, 2012, 01:27 AM   #51
JohnnyCash1979
Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2008
Posts: 21
Just get a .225 Winchester and a .264 Winchester Magnum. 2 of the greatest rounds ever made!
JohnnyCash1979 is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 08:23 AM   #52
Saskhunter
Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2012
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 30
Quote:
Just get a .225 Winchester and a .264 Winchester Magnum. 2 of the greatest rounds ever made!
Woah! I'm always amazed at the kinds of things some people will say about guns and cartridges.
Saskhunter is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 11:39 AM   #53
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 21,050
I've never messed with the .225, but odds are it'll ruin prairie dogs as well as most anything.

I once had a tack-driving .264, but I couldn't figure out any real use for it in Texas hunting. The old '06 worked plenty good, and reloads used a bunch less powder.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old October 23, 2012, 01:53 AM   #54
stevelyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Fairbanksan in exile to Aleutian Hell
Posts: 2,571
If you are set up to reload and don't mind working with wildcat or proprietary cartridges, you might look into the .30 Gibbs. It's basically a .30-06 case that blown out and lengthened a bit........a little more improved than an Ackley Improved and with a slightly shorter neck.

The beauty is that like the Ackley, the Gibbs can be fire formed from .30-06 just by seating the bullet a little long or you can purchase .30 Gibbs headstamped and formed brass by Quality Cartridge from Buffalo Arms and not waste the powder and lead for fire formng.
__________________
Herman Cain '12

Squished bugs on a windshield is proof the slow/heavy bullet theory works.
stevelyn is offline  
Old October 23, 2012, 02:02 AM   #55
.300 Weatherby Mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2008
Posts: 1,711
Quote:
Just get a .225 Winchester
22-250 Remington tossed this one in the grave and buried it alive... Good cartridge but not a match for the 22-250...

Quote:
Hi, is there any cartridges that are a little bit more powerful than a .30-06 but not a magnum?
.280 Ackley Improved
.300 Weatherby Mag is offline  
Old October 23, 2012, 02:25 AM   #56
jabames
Member
 
Join Date: September 18, 2012
Posts: 43
Although not a magnum I've been considering a .260 Remington or a 6.5 creedmoor. To match a really good .264 bullet with a high B.C., you would have to use a .30 cal bullet with about 190 grains with magnum velocities.
jabames is offline  
Old October 23, 2012, 02:41 AM   #57
.300 Weatherby Mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2008
Posts: 1,711
Quote:
6.5 creedmoor
This is what I chose.. My McMillan stock and match barrel came last week.. Let the games begin
.300 Weatherby Mag is offline  
Old October 23, 2012, 06:01 AM   #58
interlock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2012
Posts: 253
How about 30-06 Ackley Improved?
Or the 300 Ruger Compact Magnum. A little more than 30-06, but a little less than 300 WM.
interlock is offline  
Old October 23, 2012, 05:54 PM   #59
pabuckslayer08
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2010
Location: South Central Pa
Posts: 692
If you don't want a mag I'd go for the338 fed. Seems to fit your bill about perfect
pabuckslayer08 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11076 seconds with 9 queries