![]() |
|
|
#51 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 20, 2008
Posts: 21
|
Just get a .225 Winchester and a .264 Winchester Magnum. 2 of the greatest rounds ever made!
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Member
Join Date: October 16, 2012
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Staff Lead
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 21,050
|
I've never messed with the .225, but odds are it'll ruin prairie dogs as well as most anything.
![]() I once had a tack-driving .264, but I couldn't figure out any real use for it in Texas hunting. The old '06 worked plenty good, and reloads used a bunch less powder.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products! |
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Fairbanksan in exile to Aleutian Hell
Posts: 2,571
|
If you are set up to reload and don't mind working with wildcat or proprietary cartridges, you might look into the .30 Gibbs. It's basically a .30-06 case that blown out and lengthened a bit........a little more improved than an Ackley Improved and with a slightly shorter neck.
The beauty is that like the Ackley, the Gibbs can be fire formed from .30-06 just by seating the bullet a little long or you can purchase .30 Gibbs headstamped and formed brass by Quality Cartridge from Buffalo Arms and not waste the powder and lead for fire formng.
__________________
Herman Cain '12 Squished bugs on a windshield is proof the slow/heavy bullet theory works. |
|
|
|
|
#55 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2008
Posts: 1,711
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Member
Join Date: September 18, 2012
Posts: 43
|
Although not a magnum
I've been considering a .260 Remington or a 6.5 creedmoor. To match a really good .264 bullet with a high B.C., you would have to use a .30 cal bullet with about 190 grains with magnum velocities.
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2008
Posts: 1,711
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2012
Posts: 253
|
How about 30-06 Ackley Improved?
Or the 300 Ruger Compact Magnum. A little more than 30-06, but a little less than 300 WM. |
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2010
Location: South Central Pa
Posts: 692
|
If you don't want a mag I'd go for the338 fed. Seems to fit your bill about perfect
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|