The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 16, 2012, 08:40 PM   #1
droptrd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 307
do i need a 3.5 chamber?

my lgs has some good shotguns sales right now. Including a mossberg 535 combo for 330. I have a couple 500s at home and love them. Ive never owned a 3.5 chambered gun. Am i missing out? Should I jump on this deal?

I hunt duck but not too often. Mostly deer hunting.

They also have 500s in 20ga on sale too.
droptrd is offline  
Old October 16, 2012, 08:48 PM   #2
Beretta686
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 693
I've never found anything a 3-in couldn't handle, but then I haven't hunted duck in this century. It seems the only real advantage conferred on it is if you're shooting ducks waaaaaay up there (something tungston shot would work for too). But since it's a pump you're not really losing any reliability in shooting your normal 2 3/4 inch or 3 inch so there's no real downside which a 3.5 inch automatic shotgun may have in cycling lighter loads.

I wouldn't run out and buy a new one just to have a 3.5 inch magnum unless you're the most dedicated of duck/goose hunter but if you're getting a new shotgun anyways, why not get the added capability?
__________________
"Our contract called for 16 cases of rifles and ammunition for $10,000 dollars, not a machine gun...........That is our present to the General"-Pike Bishop

When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”
Beretta686 is offline  
Old October 16, 2012, 08:58 PM   #3
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,493
For ducks, not needed. The only people who can benefit from 3.5" chambers are guys who shoot geese, and do it a lot. Geese are big birds and are often shot at long range. It is hard to get enough of the large steel pellets into a 3" shell, so the 3.5's help here.

For the guy who rarely hunts geese, like me. I just have to either pass on the longer shots, or use some of the more expensive non-toxic shot. The other alternatives such a hevi-shot and some of the bismuth loads are much better than steel, even from 2 3/4" or 3" shells. But are too expensive if you are the type of guy who can go through a case of shells during waterfowl season.

The 3.5" steel shells have some kick, but are tolerable. 3.5" lead turkey or deer loads take recoil to a different level. Considering they are shot in 7.5 lb shotguns they are much worse than many elephant rifles. I've never seen a turkey wanted to kill that badly.
jmr40 is offline  
Old October 16, 2012, 09:03 PM   #4
drail
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 3,150
I agree. I never needed to kill something so badly I needed a 10 ga mag. either. I shot a few and said "that's about enough of that". It is amazing how far those things will reach. I reckon I will just get closer.
drail is offline  
Old October 17, 2012, 01:17 AM   #5
shortwave
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,920
Quote:
do i need a 3.5 chamber?
Nope.
shortwave is offline  
Old October 17, 2012, 07:19 AM   #6
seansean1444
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2010
Location: ithaca, new york (home of the ithaca shotguns!)
Posts: 395
its fun to shoot 3.5inchers!!! lots of recoil huge muzzle blast, haha besides that mostyle for turkey hunting also
seansean1444 is offline  
Old October 17, 2012, 07:47 AM   #7
jaguarxk120
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,894
Not to mention empty wallet -- 3 1/2 shells cost a lot of money.

Save your money and get yourself a nice Browning, Beretta O/U.
jaguarxk120 is offline  
Old October 17, 2012, 05:52 PM   #8
droptrd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 307
I almost went for it today. Instead I layed away ANOTHER 500 Combo for 270 out the door. I somehow convinced myself I needed a 3rd 500. Pretty good price for a combo though.

Please dont tell my wife
droptrd is offline  
Old October 17, 2012, 06:05 PM   #9
Rebel9793
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 134
my recomendation? Get closer and save the shoulder! lol 3" mag will do anything a 3.5 will do unless your shooting geese as mentioned above, or turkeys.
Rebel9793 is offline  
Old October 17, 2012, 06:14 PM   #10
jimbob86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 6,480
You don't need a 3.5" cannon for turkeys.... they are not armored with anything more than feathers, and have none of those on their head and neck where you are supposed to shoot them.

My daughter has killed 'em with 7/8 oz. trap loads out of her 20 guage. Shoot them in the head with a tight choked load of even moderate velocity, and they WILL die.
__________________
TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T."

http://nefirearm.com/
jimbob86 is offline  
Old October 17, 2012, 09:09 PM   #11
shortwave
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,920
Quote:
You don't need a 3.5" cannon for turkeys
Exactly right.

2 3/4" or 3" work just fine.

Again, unless you're hunting geese or just a 'recoil junky', just no need for the 3 1/2".

Too, you may want to research the health issue's that can come from a steady diet of heavy recoil. Sometimes we don't think of these things till it's to late.
shortwave is offline  
Old October 17, 2012, 10:02 PM   #12
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,095
not any more

The 3.5 guns came about to launch heavy loads of steel shoot at waterfowl. When lead shot became illegal for waterfowl, steel became the common alternative. Since steel is not as dense as lead, it takes big steel pellets to get a useful pellet weight. Thus the high payload 3.5's came into being.

There are now some good alternatives for steel and waterfowl, but its expensive. Steel is an affordable option, so if one is a waterfowler (geese) a 3.5 MIGHT make sense.

But, you absolutely do not need a 3.5 gun for turkeys and general shotgunning. Aheavy 3.5 load in an alloy framed gun like the Mossbergs will get your undivided attenton.
bamaranger is offline  
Old October 17, 2012, 10:26 PM   #13
Rebel9793
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 134
only reason I said 3.5 for turkey is because my father had a mossberg 835 utility mag chambered in 3.5 mag and the guy we got it from said it was decked out for turkey hunting.(was told 3.5 mag was a common turkey load) I dont hunt turkeys so I wouldnt really know anything about them. Didnt intend to start a war fellas.
Rebel9793 is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 04:10 AM   #14
bacardisteve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 371
I like the 3.5" shells for coyote as they pattern a bit better for me at 60yds.
__________________
Kill em all and let God sort em out! USAF
bacardisteve is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 05:29 AM   #15
Pistolgripshotty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Somewhere out there
Posts: 184
You don't need it man unless you are hunting from a long distance. If you do decide to go for a 3.5 you would be better off looking into getting a rifle.
__________________
12 Gauge Fury!
Pistolgripshotty is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 02:02 AM   #16
Orphanedcowboy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 16, 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 193
If it can't be done with a 3" shell, maybe you shouldn't be doing it, courtesy Randy Wakeman.

I kill a lot of ducks and geese with 3" gun and even a 20ga.

Sent from my HTC Rezound using Tapatalk 2
Orphanedcowboy is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09020 seconds with 9 queries