The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 5, 2009, 05:43 PM   #1
Firepower!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 3, 2008
Posts: 2,109
How good is Galil?

Let us discuss Galil SAR 5،56 in detail. How good is this weapon? The key aspects I am concerned about are the accuracy, reliability, and it comparison to a Kalashnikov (is it an improvement over it and how?) and to a M4/16.

Additionally I wanted to know why did the Isrealis phased it out?

I will post pictures of mine when delivered.
Firepower! is offline  
Old April 5, 2009, 06:34 PM   #2
Willie Lowman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 2,415
Israel phased the Galil be cause we (USA) were giving them M-16s. Why build great rifles when someone wants to give you ok rifles for free?

As far as accuracy and reliability, it uses the Kalashnikov style gas/feed system (as reliable as it gets). In addition, the rifle weighs around ten pounds and fires a lighter bullet than the AK making it more controllable.
Willie Lowman is offline  
Old April 5, 2009, 09:03 PM   #3
Michael A. Le Lack
Member
 
Join Date: March 31, 2008
Location: PA & FL
Posts: 47
Reliable?

I never leave home without it!
Michael A. Le Lack is offline  
Old April 5, 2009, 11:12 PM   #4
rkba_net
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 26, 2000
Posts: 153
Actually the Galil has issues with the desert environment (so does the FAL which is one of the reasons for designing the Galil) AND Israeli soldiers preferred the M4 Carbine...
rkba_net is offline  
Old April 6, 2009, 09:54 AM   #5
Firepower!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 3, 2008
Posts: 2,109
Quote:
Actually the Galil has issues with the desert environment (so does the FAL which is one of the reasons for designing the Galil) AND Israeli soldiers preferred the M4 Carbine...
So you are saying that Galil that is based on AK system has issues with sand, but M4 is prefered? It does not make sense becuase in sand M4 is the last weapon I would take. I am sure the IDF know better than I.
Firepower! is offline  
Old April 8, 2009, 04:54 AM   #6
B. Lahey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 17, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,835
Nice!

How does it shoot?
__________________
"A human being is primarily a bag for putting food into; the other functions and faculties may be more godlike, but in point of time they come afterwards."
-George Orwell
B. Lahey is offline  
Old April 8, 2009, 10:25 AM   #7
rkba_net
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 26, 2000
Posts: 153
The M4 is just fine in the desert... with proper maintenance... "Based on the AK"... means nothing as far as reliability goes... all it takes are a few minor differences to make a reliable weapon into an unreliable one. I am not saying the Galil is not reliable... just that it was not as reliable as the IDF wanted... Soldiers always prefer the weapons of the enemy.. it is natural... all of our favorite weapons have issues some worse than others...

M1 Garand - the bolt would freeze the the rain... the reason was never really figured out... hence the addition of a roller on the M14.

M14 - uncontrolable in full-auto... whenthere was a real need for a selet-fire rifle.

M16 - not enough stopping power... but the Russian were very impressed with the caliber.. so they designed the 5.45x39mm.

M60 - IMHO total piece of ****... bolt fractures, rivets in the reciever loosing (the fix was to WELD it), too easy to reassemble the trigger group wrong, the gas system has to be wired in place (or it loosens under fire)... the bipod is on the barrel (moronic!)... so you get to carry a bipod with every barrel... and the bipod is too far forward as it hampers raking fire (you have to move the weapon right and left).

AK47 - too short a sight radus, poor trigger, poor ergonomics... takes two hands to change a mag, no bolt hold open device... too short a stock (with body armor)... some of these are corrected in OTHER countries version of the AK.
rkba_net is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 02:03 PM   #8
Willie Lowman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 2,415
Is that a Israeli Galil or a South African one?

And.. umm... range report?
Willie Lowman is offline  
Old May 9, 2009, 04:40 AM   #9
lolilu1
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 5, 2009
Location: east of Cleveland ohio
Posts: 3
Galil

I had a full auto Galil ARM it was made well other then that it was only ok. Not well thought out as far as i was concerned. to front heavy. forend was boxy because the bipod fits in the forend. I'll take any Valmet over any Galil anyday. I've had both i was a class 3 dealer for 12 yrs.
lolilu1 is offline  
Old October 3, 2012, 05:23 AM   #10
freedash22
Member
 
Join Date: July 2, 2012
Posts: 47
Galil ACE

Here in the Philippines our government, in the last few months, tested the 5.56 Galil ACE carbine for a limited purchase contract to replace ageing Elisco M16 rifles of a few precincts. It did not pass due to the firing pin breaking after firing approximately 2000 rounds.
freedash22 is offline  
Old October 3, 2012, 06:58 AM   #11
spacecoast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,071
Quote:
AK47 - too short a sight radus...
Are you sure about that?


spacecoast is offline  
Old October 4, 2012, 11:37 AM   #12
5.56RifleGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 9, 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,134
I like my Galil, but its pretty darn front heavy. Never fired a full auto one, but that may be an advantage in full auto fire.
5.56RifleGuy is offline  
Old October 4, 2012, 05:24 PM   #13
testuser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2010
Posts: 495
Hmm...well FAL was dropped for the Galil, Galil was dropped for the M16/M4, and now the M16/M4 is being phased out for the Tavor.

It seems like each weapon is successively lighter and/or more compact. Even the 20 inch M16 is 1 lbs lighter than a Galil.

A Tavor with an 18 inch barrel is the same length as an M4 with a 14 inch barrel.

http://www.israel-weapon.com/default...4e1e40d0422%7D
testuser is offline  
Old October 4, 2012, 11:54 PM   #14
David Hineline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 1999
Location: South Sioux City, Nebraska
Posts: 703
M14 controllability

M14 controllability, to hard are you sure about that.

http://myweb.cableone.net/uziforme/14.wmv
David Hineline is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 11:17 AM   #15
Railcar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 9, 2013
Posts: 13
I absolutely LOVE my galil. 1 of 3 crown jewels of my collection. I spent a ton on it, but it holds a special place in the collection. One of the most reliable firearms I have ever owned.
Railcar is offline  
Old April 22, 2013, 01:27 PM   #16
RJay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,645
M14 controllable ?, I carried one in combat, yes it is very hard to control in full auto, I almost never had the switch in full auto because I didn't like to shoot at the clouds. They tried a new stock with a forward hand grip, helped but still difficult to control. That is just my hands on experience. I liked the M14 but I liked the M16 better and in my experience, just as effective and reliable and in the environment in which I used them, 100 yard accuracy was more than adequate or needed. Others with HANDS ON experience in heavy brush environment may have different views. but what the hey, I also liked the little M1 carbine. I'm sure there are those who claimed to have used the M14, one in each hand , full auto with no problems, but not I. . JMHO
__________________
Ron James

Last edited by RJay; April 22, 2013 at 01:33 PM.
RJay is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09626 seconds with 9 queries