The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 16, 2001, 06:23 PM   #1
9mmepiphany
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2000
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,092
friend of mine has a buncha (>20#) winchester 296 laying about. figured with the small case of the .40 *&* and the fact that 296 likes to be compressed...well

was wondering if anyone has some good loads for the .40, using 296, or know of a good site to find the info

thanks much...(i told him to just use some of his 231)
9mmepiphany is offline  
Old March 16, 2001, 09:18 PM   #2
Mal H
Staff
 
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 14,493
The perfect solution is for your friend to get a .44 Magnum and some 231. Then both problems would be solved - he could use up the 296 and load for the .40 S&W. 296 is not a good choice (read bad choice) for the .40, it's much too slow.
Mal H is offline  
Old March 17, 2001, 12:11 PM   #3
Paul B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,617
W-296 is not suitable for the .40 S&W.
Paul B.
Paul B. is offline  
Old March 17, 2001, 12:58 PM   #4
Desert Dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 1999
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 473
W296 is for magnum pistol cartridges

40 S&W does not have the case capacity to work with 296. Even a compressed load in the .40 case might not have enough pressure to even get the bullet out of the barrel.

Go buy you some AA#7, which, in my opinion, is one of the better powders for .40.

Leave the 296 to the tall, magnum cases... (.357, .41, .44, .45 Colt)

__________________
.45 Super... Fat and FAST... but for real firepower, .45 Blackhawk!

Yes, in fact I do have a 454... in more ways than one.

"No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority" - Thomas Jefferson
Desert Dog is offline  
Old March 17, 2001, 08:35 PM   #5
PaulTX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 9, 1999
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 107
Win296 also likes magnum primers.
PaulTX is offline  
Old March 18, 2001, 08:47 PM   #6
Chad Young
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 20, 1999
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 601
Win 296 is also very nice for use in .30 Carbine cartidges. I love stuffing 18.5 grains of W296 under a 125 gr Remington Golden Sabre in a .357 mag case. Definitely a Ruger or S&W only load! (clocked at over 1800 fps)
Chad Young is offline  
Old March 19, 2001, 02:54 PM   #7
Cheapo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 1998
Posts: 986
Nuts! I've stuffed up to 20.5 of 296 under W-W and Hornady JHPs and never got more than 1450 out of a 6-inch *&*. At 80 to 100 degrees!

Even allowing for the fact that I have fired other loads in another revolver and it gives higher pressures and about 100 fps more than mine does, getting 1800+ looks unattainable for me...

I've always wondered why no 296 loads have been developed for the .40 slick&willie. The operating pressure is only 5,000 psi less than .357, IIRC.
Cheapo is offline  
Old March 19, 2001, 04:33 PM   #8
Calif Hunter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 10, 2000
Location: La Palma, CA, USA
Posts: 165
Another reason W-296 would not be a good powder for an autoloader is that it requires a good strong crimp like a roll crimp into a cannelure or crimping groove. An auto needs to headspace on the case mouth and that means a taper crimp. Without that strong crimp, you'll get erratic velocity and a possibly dangerous condition in poor ignition and/or "secondary ignition." That happened to me with a .357 load using a full jacketed slug with no crimp groove. It bulged the barrel on my Colt Trooper.
__________________
Calif Hunter
Calif Hunter is offline  
Old March 19, 2001, 06:01 PM   #9
Patrick Graham
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 18, 1999
Location: Kokomo, Indiana USA
Posts: 674

The only rounds I use WW296 for is 357 mag and 44 mag. It works great for those.

Using WW296 in 40 would play into the hands of the "Glocks go KABOOM" people and we don't want to do that.



Patrick Graham is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07920 seconds with 9 queries