The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 18, 2012, 09:58 AM   #1
MSD Mike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2009
Posts: 137
New 686

Does anyone have any experience with the new Smith 586/686? I am considering buying one but would like to hear some first hand experiences regarding fit, finish, accuracy etc.
I understand they have a lock and the old versus new pricing and all that. Just looking for some reports on the new guns.

Thanks
Mike
MSD Mike is offline  
Old August 18, 2012, 10:08 AM   #2
nyc71
Member
 
Join Date: May 26, 2011
Posts: 57
I recently got a 4" 686, I ran 200 rounds of 38 spl & .357 mag. As expected it's well built & accurate. Going to run another 200 of my reloads on my next rdo.
Btw I can't stand the safety lock.
nyc71 is offline  
Old August 18, 2012, 10:51 AM   #3
MrBorland
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,851
They may not have the fit and finish of older ones, and some really hate MIM & The Lock, but they generally shoot great - at least as good as the older ones, IME.

FWIW, my main IDPA gun is a newer 686 and it's been shot really hard, and it's still very accurate and reliable. No complaints from me.

http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost....2&postcount=40

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNFer...hannel&list=UL
MrBorland is online now  
Old August 18, 2012, 02:48 PM   #4
schneiderguy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2012
Posts: 10
I bought a new 686+ 4" a few months ago and I like it. No complaints with the fit and finish. I put some Ahrends grips on and it's a nice looking gun.

schneiderguy is offline  
Old August 18, 2012, 03:50 PM   #5
pete2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 834
I have a newer 686+ with the lock on it, it hasn't caused a problem, have a 642 and a 625 with the locks. The guns have other problems but the lock is just there. All three are just as accurate as the older revolvers but don't have the fit and finish of the older revolvers. There are a lot of used revolvers for sale. I just bought a model 15-3, not like new but very nice for 365.00. I have an older 586 that's a real shooter, used it for IDPA with a Kydex holster so it isn't pretty any more but it may be my favorite for shooting.
pete2 is offline  
Old August 18, 2012, 04:00 PM   #6
Lambdebois
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 2, 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 123
I have put several thousand rounds of 357 and even more of 38spl in my 4" 686+. Shoots great! Very accurate! Love shooting it. The weight helps soak up recoil from heavy hot loads and the Houge grips feel great to me! Zero problems.....
Lambdebois is offline  
Old August 18, 2012, 06:32 PM   #7
BigJimP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 11,391
I have about 25 S&W revolvers...all older models ( 19's, 27's, 28's, 66's, 686's in .357 mag ) .....and I prefer them ...but there is nothing wrong with the newer versions. I've seen the newer versions go thru thousands of rounds in the rental case...at my local range..they hold up just fine.
BigJimP is offline  
Old August 18, 2012, 08:46 PM   #8
4 Paws
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2012
Posts: 129
Funny you mention the 686. My local shop has had a 686 no dash sitting in the display case for the past month. Nice looking gun with tight lockup. I'm surprised it's still there to be honest. I have a feeling that the next time I stop there it might just find a new home
4 Paws is offline  
Old August 19, 2012, 02:05 AM   #9
warningshot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2009
Posts: 995
New, stock, 4 inch 686....plus one.
warningshot is offline  
Old August 19, 2012, 05:25 AM   #10
Zhillsauditor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2008
Posts: 635
I have a 6" 686+ and it is a fine weapon. I think the fit and finish are just a good as on my older S&Ws, but I only have 6 of those to compare it with. People get their panties twisted over the lock, but it is easy to remove/immobilize.
Zhillsauditor is offline  
Old August 19, 2012, 06:11 AM   #11
540mope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2008
Location: yonder
Posts: 334
There have been way too many complaints about S&W's current lack of quality control. If buying in person, be sure to check that the barrel is not cockeyed
...like this one is. Hope for the best if you have one shipped.

http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-rev...w-686-6-a.html
540mope is offline  
Old August 19, 2012, 08:02 AM   #12
MSD Mike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2009
Posts: 137
Thanks for the input guys, I have several old pinned barrel K-frames and enjoy them a great deal. I am looking for a new gun that I can play with some heavier loads with and give the older guns a little milder life. Sounds like the new 686's are just the ticket if you get to inspect before you buy.

Thanks
Mike
MSD Mike is offline  
Old August 19, 2012, 09:39 AM   #13
carprivershooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2008
Location: Michigan, Upper Pennsula
Posts: 396
Fine weapon

Mike ,I too have a 4" 686 shoot great a tack driver, I like it so much I am planning on getting the 3" model for daily carry.I don't normally recommend a gun to someone but I have no problem saying the 686 is well worth the money and I think you will enjoy shooting it.
__________________
CarpriverShOOter
Finch, I don't like guns. Reese, Me either but if someone has to have guns I'd rather it be me. (Person of Interest).
No trees were destroyed in the posting of the this message
carprivershooter is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10156 seconds with 9 queries