bump fire stock - Page 2

dascottsman · January 1, 2012, 06:43 AM

That was what I was thinking V.Oller.

MrDontPlay · January 1, 2012, 03:40 PM

The AK stock isn't near as ugly as the AR stock either

jersey_emt · February 16, 2012, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V.Oller

Let's see a select fire M-16 runs around $15k (yes thousand) (+/-) add the $200 tax stamp = pretty expensive.

$350 doesn't seem like all that much when you put it in this perspective.

Precisely. Setting off 600+ rounds per minute (10+ rounds per second) is just plain fun. Expensive fun though.

The "slide fire stock" ($350) with a basic AR-15 ($800) gives you 85% of the fun of a true full-auto AR-15/M16 ($15,200) for for less than 8% of the cost.

It has absolutely no use other than putting a smile on your face and lightening your wallet from buying all the extra ammo you'll need.

Skans · February 16, 2012, 10:31 AM

Quote:

It has absolutely no use other than putting a smile on your face and lightening your wallet from buying all the extra ammo you'll need.

I don't know that it has absolutely no use - I'd bet folks can get pretty proficient with the bump-fire stock with practice. It would have almost the same usefulness as a full-auto M16. .223 Wolf is cheap - have fun!

jclayto · February 17, 2012, 07:12 PM

Just out of curiosity, from those that have tried both versions of the slidefire is the AK version even easier to bump fire? I am thinking the increased recoil would probably help the bump even more but not sure.

MagnumWill · February 17, 2012, 09:22 PM

Guys, guys, guys.... come on now...

http://www.poormansmachinegun.com/PMMG5.htm

Why spend $300 on an ugly stock when that can go towards ammo? A rubber band is like .02 cents, and readily removable

It works phenominally on my AES-10B

MagnumWill · February 17, 2012, 09:42 PM

Here you go. For your viewing pleasure

My AES-10B doing the rubber band bumpfire. It helps to have a foregrip, but it can be done easily without it. Mine has a Romy-G grip to help (which was a pain to put on, mind you

)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4f5cZ...eature=mh_lolz

January 1, 2012, 03:40 PM	#27
MrDontPlay Senior Member Join Date: December 25, 2010 Posts: 587	The AK stock isn't near as ugly as the AR stock either __________________ Someday I'll be good enough to know if a gun is accurate or not.

February 17, 2012, 09:22 PM	#31
MagnumWill Senior Member Join Date: March 19, 2009 Location: Central Colorado Posts: 657	Guys, guys, guys.... come on now... http://www.poormansmachinegun.com/PMMG5.htm Why spend $300 on an ugly stock when that can go towards ammo? A rubber band is like .02 cents, and readily removable It works phenominally on my AES-10B __________________ Always carry an extra magazine when CCW. Friends don't let friends get a double-feed first round out. -Will

February 17, 2012, 09:42 PM	#32
MagnumWill Senior Member Join Date: March 19, 2009 Location: Central Colorado Posts: 657	Here you go. For your viewing pleasure My AES-10B doing the rubber band bumpfire. It helps to have a foregrip, but it can be done easily without it. Mine has a Romy-G grip to help (which was a pain to put on, mind you ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4f5cZ...eature=mh_lolz __________________ Always carry an extra magazine when CCW. Friends don't let friends get a double-feed first round out. -Will

January 1, 2012, 06:43 AM	#26
dascottsman Senior Member Join Date: November 9, 2011 Location: colorado-a-fornia Posts: 112	That was what I was thinking V.Oller.

February 17, 2012, 07:12 PM	#30
jclayto Senior Member Join Date: February 14, 2005 Location: Anderson, SC Posts: 524	Just out of curiosity, from those that have tried both versions of the slidefire is the AK version even easier to bump fire? I am thinking the increased recoil would probably help the bump even more but not sure.