The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 31, 2012, 10:21 PM   #1
warbirdlover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2009
Location: central Wisconsin
Posts: 2,324
New bill to Hunt Wolves

We have wolves on our hunting land and this would allow us to shoot them if it passes. Also need the wolves to be taken off the endangered list I think. That's why I posted in the other thread. Three of us could have shot the alpha male that was chasing a doe right by our blinds during rifle season the last couple years. Hope this is a decent enough explanation.

http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2011...sals/ab502.pdf
warbirdlover is offline  
Old January 31, 2012, 10:36 PM   #2
Wyoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,265
I hope they get it passed. We in Wyoming are suposed to finally get our chance next year!

Good luck with the enviro-litigation.
__________________
Go Pokes!
Go Rams!
Wyoredman is offline  
Old February 1, 2012, 05:05 AM   #3
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,539
if it passes you need to hit them hard and fast. the first year wolve hunting was legalized in idaho limits were met in all but one unit, this year last year there was almost no limit at all and the harvests have been abysmal...they caught on real quick that they weren't protected anymore.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the crap people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
Bean counters told me I couldn't fire a man for being in a wheelchair, did it anyway. Ramps are expensive.-Cave Johnson.
tahunua001 is offline  
Old February 3, 2012, 03:54 PM   #4
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,533
Quote:
they caught on real quick that they weren't protected anymore
Yeah, they're real smart animals. Smart often translates to "a lot of trouble". That's one reason why we killed them off 100 years ago. Well, time to get back to work, I guess.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old February 3, 2012, 04:09 PM   #5
markj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,969
Nebraska is looking at lion hunting or I should say cougar but didnt want anyone confusing the cougar hunting already going on....... thisa is for the mountain lions/. 25 bucks for a entry in a yearly drawing. Hmmm wonder if hounds will be allowed?

http://www.kmtv.com/news/local/137071203.html
markj is offline  
Old February 3, 2012, 05:52 PM   #6
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 2,287
Quote:
We have wolves on our hunting land and this would allow us to shoot them if it passes.
No it wouldn't. What it would do if passed is to establish a season and the opportunity for you to apply for a permit for a $10 application fee. If you are lucky and are drawn for a tag, it will cost you $100 for a kill permit. The kill permit will be good for 1 of 4 wolf zones in the state. Once the desired number of wolves in that zone are killed, the season will close in that zone regardless of the season dates and number of permits yet unfilled. Number of permits is yet to be determined, but the number I have heard the most is 400.....for the entire state. Altho the bill proposes a Oct. 15 to Feb. 28 season, one of the recommendations from DNR officials is for the season to run in December and January, and not during the traditional gun deer season. Recommendations are also that the season be "very conservative" for the first few years. Here in Wisconsin with a limited supply of tags and the likelihood of high numbers of applications, odds are, only luck or a accumulation of preference points will get one a permit. Number of wolves shot illegally this last year and years to come will also determine number of permits given out.

As a now, the wolves are desisted in Wisconsin and landowners have the authority to shoot a wolf that is attacking a pet or livestock without a permit. Landowners that have a history of predation problems with wolves have a opportunity to obtain a permit to take problem wolves. The DNR actually sent letters to those landowners earlier this week inviting them to apply, but as yet, no permits have been issued.

What all this tells me is that odds are, in the near future, most Wisconsin residents will still be unable to legally shoot a wolf. For those that are lucky enough to draw a permit, it will be a expensive hunt with a low probability of success. It will be a long time before one can just randomly shoot one from their deer blind legally, without proper authorization first. Still, we are heading in the right direction with this and I will be standing in line with many others when it comes to sending in an application for a permit.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old February 3, 2012, 10:11 PM   #7
warbirdlover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2009
Location: central Wisconsin
Posts: 2,324
Quote:
What all this tells me is that odds are, in the near future, most Wisconsin residents will still be unable to legally shoot a wolf. For those that are lucky enough to draw a permit, it will be a expensive hunt with a low probability of success. It will be a long time before one can just randomly shoot one from their deer blind legally, without proper authorization first. Still, we are heading in the right direction with this and I will be standing in line with many others when it comes to sending in an application for a permit.
Okay, I "meant" it would allow us to shoot them after we bought a license or permit or whatever.....

And three of us have had the big black alpha wolf chase doe right by our stands during gun deer season. One of the guys had the wolf in his sights and could have easily killed it if he was a violator.

Last edited by warbirdlover; February 4, 2012 at 01:02 AM.
warbirdlover is offline  
Old February 3, 2012, 11:09 PM   #8
Gbro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,056
Buck460VXR,

What state are you referring to with the 400 limit?
MN is making a proposal for a 400 wolf limit even though the people making that proposal admit that 400 is a very conservative number.
We will be having public meetings that will challenge that number.
site;

And updated;

Sound like our DNR is more interested in how the HSNA feels about wolf hunting (Barf)!
__________________
Gbro
CGVS
For the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, But to us who are being saved, It Is The Power Of God. 1Corinthians 1-18
Gbro is offline  
Old February 4, 2012, 11:19 AM   #9
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 2,287
Quote:
Buck460VXR,

What state are you referring to with the 400 limit?
MN is making a proposal for a 400 wolf limit even though the people making that proposal admit that 400 is a very conservative number.
Gbro....the 400 number is what I have heard for the number of permits to be issued in Wisconsin. The number of wolves to be killed I have not heard much about, but since Minnesota has approximately 4 times the number of wolves as Wisconsin, I assume the kill number will be substantially lower here than in Minnesota. What I have heard is that the number of wolves shot illegally here this year would amount to 1/4 to 1/3 of the legal number of wolves targeted to be killed. Once again, dirtball violators are taking opportunities from legitimate hunters. Also, nuisance wolves killed by landowners will also be taken into account when issuing permits for the sport hunting of wolves. This I have no problem with and is a no-brainer.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old February 4, 2012, 01:45 PM   #10
Deja vu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,180
I saw lots of wolves here in Idaho untill hunting season started, they all went in to hiding and only come out at night. (I think they know they can not be hunted at night)
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull.

all 25 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple
Deja vu is offline  
Old February 5, 2012, 09:43 AM   #11
Gbro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,056
Quote:
(I think they know they can not be hunted at night)
I see the Wisconsin proposed framework includes night hunting and I hope that MN also has that.
I do know that running a wolf hunt during any deer season would be a huge safety issue if night hunting at the same time and I opine that because of the greater numbers afield.
I can see a faction of wolf hunters that would be hunting in a combat "point man" style.

Quote:
but since Minnesota has approximately 4 times the number of wolves as Wisconsin,
Again this will be a huge influence to MN's quota.
I believe and have always believed our wolf population was always strong and the only reason for the ESA was to over-populate MN to establish a resident wolf pop. in Wisc.
I tell my old friend from Wisc. that a wolf like any true Minnesotan would only naturally return home ASAP
__________________
Gbro
CGVS
For the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, But to us who are being saved, It Is The Power Of God. 1Corinthians 1-18
Gbro is offline  
Old February 5, 2012, 10:54 AM   #12
grubbylabs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Hansen Idaho
Posts: 1,442
I bought my wolf tag this year but with a new baby showing up it did not work out to get out and find one. But I have a happy new baby girl so it all works out. I just hope I can murder one or two next year.
__________________
* (Swinging club) Whack! whack! whack! *

Nope, the old nag's still dead .
(Capt Charlie)
grubbylabs is offline  
Old February 6, 2012, 09:37 AM   #13
warbirdlover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2009
Location: central Wisconsin
Posts: 2,324
Cougar....



Mountain Lion....



Other Cougar....

Attached Images
File Type: jpg Cougar.jpg (86.8 KB, 52 views)
File Type: jpg Mountain Line.jpg (86.8 KB, 52 views)
File Type: jpg cougar2.jpg (62.3 KB, 32 views)

Last edited by warbirdlover; February 7, 2012 at 12:11 AM.
warbirdlover is offline  
Old February 6, 2012, 11:02 AM   #14
grubbylabs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Hansen Idaho
Posts: 1,442
Hay that's the same picture?
__________________
* (Swinging club) Whack! whack! whack! *

Nope, the old nag's still dead .
(Capt Charlie)
grubbylabs is offline  
Old February 7, 2012, 12:09 AM   #15
warbirdlover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2009
Location: central Wisconsin
Posts: 2,324
I fixed it....
warbirdlover is offline  
Old February 7, 2012, 11:52 AM   #16
grubbylabs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Hansen Idaho
Posts: 1,442
Now I see the difference. Thanks
__________________
* (Swinging club) Whack! whack! whack! *

Nope, the old nag's still dead .
(Capt Charlie)
grubbylabs is offline  
Old February 7, 2012, 05:30 PM   #17
markj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,969
All are equally scary man .
markj is offline  
Old February 7, 2012, 07:11 PM   #18
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 2,287
Quote:
All are equally scary man

At least the top two would kill you quickly. The bottom cougar would just *&%# you to death.
buck460XVR is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.12100 seconds with 10 queries