The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 27, 2012, 08:10 PM   #26
Sefner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 769
Quote:
I think a policy arbitrarily forbidding anyone who uses some form of mild mood enhancing drug from owning guns is a very dangerous and slippery slope. Based on usage, it is a good bet that there are many TFL members in that category.
Hope you're not drinking Pepsi, coffee, or tea, else you're taking a mood-enhancing drug, caffeine!
__________________
gtalk:renfes steamID: Sefner
Sefner is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 10:21 PM   #27
C0untZer0
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
Another problem with drugs..

My oldest daughter has ADHD. She was taking Stratera and then a combination of Stratera and Ritalin, and then her doctor recomended adding Prozac. I was shocked I said "Prozac is for depression!" Her doctor said it wasn't just to treat depression and that it would probably help her in school.

She's now on Stratera, Adderal and Prozac and she's doing fairly well in school - she is 11, in advanced math and took the ACT last month and got a remarkable score on it.

She's also learning to shoot.

I hope someday that she enjoys shooting as much as I do, I do worry that if they instituted questions on a FOID or CWL "Have you ever taken or been prescribed any of the following drugs: ___________ " I'm sure Prozac would be at the top of the list, and I'd hate for her to be denied the right to buy firearms because she once took a small dose of Prozac for ADHD.
C0untZer0 is offline  
Old January 28, 2012, 12:30 AM   #28
betterdays
Member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2011
Posts: 25
You don't point guns at people. Call the cops, thats what they're there for.
__________________
Enjoy every sandwich.
betterdays is offline  
Old January 28, 2012, 02:27 AM   #29
farmerboy
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
Betterdays , i got alot to say about that stupid comment
but I'll choose to keep them to myself for once. I know if I said what I'm thinking I'll have an admin wanting to boot me off here (again). Just to prove a point about human intelligence go back and reread two comments and you'll see how some people think and then you'll know that with ones like this no wonder our country in going in the direction it is.

Last edited by farmerboy; January 28, 2012 at 02:36 AM.
farmerboy is offline  
Old January 28, 2012, 07:36 AM   #30
cambeul41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2004
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 101
Quote:
You don't point guns at people. Call the cops, thats what they're there for.
And what do you expect the police to do?
cambeul41 is offline  
Old January 28, 2012, 08:43 AM   #31
simonm2211
Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2009
Posts: 20
More info here...

In summary, the doorbell rang 3 times around 11pm and she answered each time to find no-one there.
After the 3rd time, she goes outside with a 9mm.
She fires the weapon.
Minutes later a teenager walks down the street and she holds him at gun point. Police arrive and arrest her. And she is 47 y.o.

http://www.officer.com/news/10617466...acted-to-prank

Last edited by simonm2211; January 28, 2012 at 08:46 AM. Reason: to get hyperlink to work
simonm2211 is offline  
Old January 28, 2012, 11:16 AM   #32
Frank Ettin
Staff
 
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 6,277
Bottom line is that a gun is not a tool of universal application. Lethal force may justifiably be used only in a fairly narrow range of circumstances.

It appears that this woman got her gun and fired it when she had no reason recognized as good under the applicable law. If that's the case, she's going to be in a bunch of legal trouble.

The thing is, how well do you understand when you may lawfully use lethal force?

Last edited by Frank Ettin; January 28, 2012 at 03:59 PM.
Frank Ettin is offline  
Old January 28, 2012, 12:22 PM   #33
brickeyee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,342
even attorneys can be bit by the stupid bug, and one took a big chunk out of her.
brickeyee is offline  
Old January 30, 2012, 04:57 PM   #34
markj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,936
Now if there was a paper bag and if it was indeed on fire.......

Quote:
How would some others say they would've handled it any differently?
I would not fire upon someone was ringing the doorbell. Is this some new form of threat now?

I would have turned the dogs loose. Oops sorry bout that, shouldnt have been on the porch.....
markj is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07917 seconds with 9 queries