![]() |
|
|
#26 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2010
Location: East Texas USA
Posts: 1,776
|
JD 3020,
If its made by National Ordanance, Its not a collectors item, but If everything is OK but the stock, I would replace the stock and keep it. It should be fine for a shooter. Sorry. It fooled me too.
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 542
|
Google Sante Fe 1903a3 while you're at it.They were commercial receivers paired up with G.I parts.The Fed receiver and broken scant stock pretty much puts it in a category of parts instead of a collectable.
A friend got one in trade assembled with almost mint Remington parts,so he looked around until he found a Rem marked receiver.Stripped the rifle and assembled a great condition Remington correct 1903a3. |
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 2,589
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,868
|
Heck I had to look three time to catch the NO roll mark, old age is here!
I saw a NO at a local shop recently, it wasn't a bad looking rifle. Bolt cycled very nice. I believe these are an investment cast receiver like SAI uses on the M1A and repro Garands. I would just hang a nice C stock on it and shoot the poop out of it. Evil bay has several new C stocks listed, some under $100. It may not have the history of a usgi rifle but history doesn't make shoot better. Now that I think about it, every part but the receiver is gi, so it does have some history, just not as well documented.
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2010
Location: East Texas USA
Posts: 1,776
|
If he wanted to he could build a nice rifle out of the parts, there are 1903 recievers for sale from time to time, usually for about 200 dollars.
He could put his parts on that, get a Smith to set the headspace and have a complete 1903 A3. But if the investment cast reciever is strong eneough, and safe eneough to shoot, You could put a stock on it and shoot and enjoy it. Thats the problem with my Remington 1903 A3 I worry about shooting it and wearing it out. |
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 2,589
|
The 1903A3 is an extremely strong action. It was made for war- It will outlast you, no doubt!
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2011
Location: mo
Posts: 175
|
I guess I'm confused. What is the "no roll mark" you all are talking about?
__________________
"Life's hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." ¯ John Wayne "If guns kill people then i can blame mis-spelled words on my pencil" |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 2,589
|
Hi JD
he means the National Ordnance rollmark on the receiver, just forward of the bolt, where the serial number is |
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,868
|
Sorry JD, I get carried away with the abbreviations some times.
NO= National Ordnance. The major 1903/1903A3 roll marks. SA=Springfield Armory RIA=Rock Island Armory R=Remington SC=Smith Corona Don't be concerned about the National Ordnance cast receiver. It's a post war part and well be just fine for shooting. In fact there are current 1903A3 reproduction snipers being produced and sold for about 1K that use a cast receiver I believe. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|