The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 21, 2001, 05:56 AM   #1
Bowser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2001
Posts: 257
Hi,

I will be picking up my Browning Buckmark in 9 days, and would appreciate any ammo suggestions for it.

Thanks,

Bowser.
Bowser is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 08:51 AM   #2
jlflegal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 18, 2000
Posts: 129
I've had my Buckmark for a little over a year and have fired nearly 6,000 rounds thru it. Here's what I've found:

The best for accuracy and reliability is Thunderbolt.

Real close second is Federal 550 bulk pack.

Real close third is CCI Blazer.

Sometimes I can't tell the difference shooting at 15 yds,
offhand, but with a rest the T-Bolt really shows its the one.

Definitely stay away from Wildcat, and American Eagle, you wouldn't believe the "strays" and "flyers"!!
jlflegal is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 09:10 AM   #3
zanthope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 258
I've had my Buckmark Camper for a couple of months...maybe put 1000 rounds through it.

I tried the bulk pack stuff - Remington, Federal - with mixed results. Thunderbolts the same.

Tried the MiniMags from CCI, and....EUREKA....a marriage made in heaven. They're accurate, consistent, feel good in the gun.

I'm paying $3.00/100.

Keep those slide bolts tight...mine would loosen up every 50 rounds or so. I cured the problem with blue Locktite.

Here's a site for an inexpensive scope mount adaptor:

http://www.jackweigand.com/bbm22.html

Are you the Bowser from GT?



zanthope is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 09:31 AM   #4
Swamp Yankee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2000
Location: Northeastern Ct.
Posts: 1,013
The current inventory includes 2 Buckmarks. A standard 5.5 and a Target 5.5. The only ammo issue I ever experienced with either was FTF with about a dozen rounds from 1 brick of Winchester in the Standard. I usually shoot CCI MiniMags or Remington hollow points whichever is on sale at the time.
Buckmarks are great pistols, I'm sure you'll enjoy yours.
Take Care
Swamp Yankee is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 09:38 AM   #5
Bullshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2000
Location: Northeast OH
Posts: 242
Great Fun

I put a Tasco Pro Point red dot on my Buckmark and it's just a blast to shoot. I use CCI Blazer almost exclusively (cheap and accurate).

For a quick pic, go to: http://home.neo.rr.com/ohioshooter/i...0red%20dot.jpg




__________________
Show your support for our 2nd Amendment Rights - go to www.bigboreclothes.com
Bullshooter is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 11:36 AM   #6
Correia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 1998
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 3,740
Another vote for CCI Blazer, or Stingers. Both are accurate in my Buckmark and Blazers are cheap.

Hmm... I'm sensing a trend here.
Correia is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 12:33 PM   #7
GHILLIE
Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2000
Location: IL
Posts: 47
I have two Buckmark pistols, and both are high on my favorites list. I shoot Winchester super x solids and Win. powerpoints. The super x loads are very accurate and consistent, and the powerpoint loads border on the accuracy level of the lower end match ammo, and a whole lot cheaper.

Ghillie
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. " Ben Franklin
GHILLIE is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 12:40 PM   #8
Oleg Volk
Staff Alumnus
 
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 7,022
Mom's 5.5" standard feeds ANYTHING

$9/550rds Walmart Remington Golden Bullets is likely the cleanest choice. CCI Mini Mag +V (HOT semi-wadcutter) works well as a defense load (Mom is limited to .22 for a vareity of reasons). Stingers, Mini Mags, Winchester Super X also work. Blasers, Wildcats function but are dirty. I have yet to find a round that wouldn't work.
Oleg Volk is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 12:59 PM   #9
abrahamsmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 5, 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 177
First of all, after extensive testing with my rifle (Anschuetz 1416D), I found that only CCI ammo is clean and consistent enough for me to consider.

For my new Buckmark, I found that CCI MiniMag FMJ (non-HP) is pretty accurate, getting a couple to three inch(*) group off a bench at 25 yard.

Also, CCI Stingers are surprisingly acurate. a 3 shot group of about 1 inch(*) at 25 yds.

CCI Minimag Sihouette's make a group about twice the size of the regular MiniMags, which surprised me sicne they work well in my rifle.



By the way, I would suggest NOT to use Blazers.. I've found them to be VERY DIRTY. I prefer MiniMags, since they're still quite cheap, and a LOT cleaner. (of course, I was firing these when it was about 10'F outside, so all dirt problems seemed compounded)


(*) These measurements are only based on my memory, so aren't very precise. The 10 shots of Minimags were all inside the black on a 75 ft NRA small bore rifle target.
the 3 shots of Stingers were in 8/9/10 rings.


__________________
Abe Smith,
President of UW-Madison's
Student Alliance for Firearm Education and Responsibility
abrahamsmith is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 01:36 PM   #10
9x19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 1998
Location: Sherman, TX USA
Posts: 2,687
I have three BuckMarks.

A 4" Micro with adjustable sights.

A 5.5" Standard with Tasco Accu-Dot

A 5.5" Target with Simmons 2x scope.

The Micro and Standard both like the Federal Bulk Pack Hollow Points from Wal-Mart, while the Target prefers the CCI Mini-Mags.

Good luck.

9x19 is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 02:49 PM   #11
Bradl45
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2001
Posts: 13
I've had great luck with CCI mini-mags, but they are a little pricy. Best bang for the buck I've found is the bulk federal from wal-mart, 550 rounds for $9, I have only had 1 falure ro fire in over 10 boxes. I can shoot 1 box of 550 rounds without problems from a dirty gun, so I clean after each box is fired. CCi stingers work great on the rabbits, and also run well, but have been less accurate than the mini-mags or the bulk federal.

Good day

Brad
Bradl45 is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 09:16 PM   #12
Charlie D
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 28, 2000
Location: Newark, DE USA
Posts: 166
Here's my Bucky with Excalibur Rosewood grips. They fit me better than the stock grips and I think they look better too.

Charlie D is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 10:22 PM   #13
VonFatman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2000
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 577
My "Standard" Buckmark loves Winchester Super-X.
VonFatman is offline  
Old January 21, 2001, 11:35 PM   #14
Bowser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2001
Posts: 257
Thanks everyone for all the replies. Looks like I'll be buying small boxes of different types.

Bowser.
Bowser is offline  
Old January 22, 2001, 12:05 AM   #15
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2000
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,073
A guy I saw at the range, printing tiny groups with his Buckmark, said it liked the Remington subsonic best. Only slightly more expensive than the cheap stuff.

His theory was that, going supersonic out of a small barrel destabilized the little bullets. Subsonic is "steady state" the whole way.

I don't know, but he was making tiny groups. Worth a try. Quieter when hunting, too...
Dave R is offline  
Old January 22, 2001, 01:22 PM   #16
Ledbetter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2000
Location: California USA
Posts: 4,535
Beautiful guns, all.

Greetings,

I have a Ruger MkII Slabside with a Weaver rail and have mounted every sort of sight (Trijicon Reflex holo-dot, Beamshot laser, Tasco 2x scope) on it.

I still prefer my perfectly stock Buck Mark Plus 5.5"



for most shooting. Even with open sights, it's a tack driver. It likes Mini Mags best, and Winchester High-velocity solid points almost as much. Also, Peters ammo works pretty good.

Subsonic ammo is good if there's no wind. The transition to supersonic flight cause a small sonic boom ("crack") which has a destabilizing effect on the bullet. On the other hand, the longer the bullet is in flight, the more effect the wind will have on it.
Ledbetter is offline  
Old February 15, 2001, 09:54 PM   #17
Gunz387
Member
 
Join Date: August 5, 1999
Posts: 43
How often do you clean your Buckmarks? I have a Buckmark camper and am starting to feel guilty for not cleaning it after every shooting session. I shot it twice within the last month and both times I only wiped down the outside with an oily rag. I love this gun but I don't have the time to clean it after every time I shoot, I am considering trading it in on another Buckmark but in stainless. Do you guys abuse your weapons like I do?

Oh ya, mine prefers federal 550 bulk packs over Winchester powerpoints, and Remington golden tips.
__________________
Criminals prefer unarmed victims
Gunz387 is offline  
Old February 16, 2001, 12:16 AM   #18
handgun357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2001
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 293
My Buckmark just loves Remmington Thunderbolts
and they are $9.00 for 500 rounds.
I also use them for my rifle matches.
They are more consistant than target ammo I've used.
Happy Plinking.............
__________________
Always identify your target before you shoot.
NRA Member
handgun357 is offline  
Old February 16, 2001, 06:04 AM   #19
Blue Heeler
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 4, 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,043
Brownings are very forgiving with all types of ammo.I have a Medallist which goes reliably with almost any kind of load.Mostly tho' I shoot CCI which gives good accuracy as well as reliable function.They are designed to be target guns as most European weapons are,if you start shooting hot stuff through them they might start to give bother.If you want to shoot rough stuff then something like a Ruger is the way to go.
Blue Heeler is offline  
Old February 16, 2001, 06:18 AM   #20
iso1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2000
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 573
The only problem I've had with my Buckmark Standard was:

When the magazine was loaded with a 40 grain (I think that was the size) bullet, it would not seat into the mag well.

I had to take out the larger size and drop back down to the 36 grain. I don't remember which brand for sure, but I believe it was Winchester.

Anyway, other than that, it eats damn near anything. Only other problems I've had were due to the ammo...failure to feed, failure to eject, misfires, squibs, etc. The pistol functions perfectly as long as the ammo does.

iso1 is offline  
Old February 16, 2001, 06:54 AM   #21
Hal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 7,435
Gunz387,
To the best of my knowledge, Buckmarks don't come in stainless. I believe they are only offered in regular steel, blued or the *whatever you call the finish on the camper, either the dull or camo*, and nickel.

On topic: All three of my Buckmarks (yes, I have a *whatever Camper too. Luv it to pieces, dull finish and all) consistantly prefer Thunderbolts for function and Winchester X-Pert for accuracy. Functionality with the X-Perts is pretty much non existant though. None of them will reliably feed and cycle using X-Perts.
Hal is offline  
Old February 17, 2001, 09:47 AM   #22
HeadHunter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 21, 1999
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 162
Mine likes Thunderbolts the best also. Golden Bullets from Remington works pretty well also. Federal Lightning was absolutely worthless, one light strike per magazine. Blazer wasn't that hot either.

I spray mine out GunScrubber or Brakleen periodically and relubricate. Not into gun cleaning like some folks are, but then I shoot a lot, so I don't have time for it.
HeadHunter is offline  
Old February 17, 2001, 02:40 PM   #23
Keith Rogan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 1999
Location: Kodiak, Alaska
Posts: 1,014
I bought a Buckmark some years ago and found it quite finicky about which ammo it liked - it would start jamming up after a hundred or two hundred rounds. At the time I was shooting several thousand rounds a month - using the Buckmark as trainer for a 1911. I'd have to clean the gun out throughly before it would shoot well again.

My solution was found by accident, I bought a brick of CCI Blazers and discovered it would just shoot and shoot and shoot with those. I could shoot up an entire brick in an afternoon and my gun could just be brushed off and have a dab or two of oil applied to the slide and be ready to go again.
I know someone else above complained of the excess residue left by these but that has not been a problem for me. Whatever propellant they use leaves a fine powder - almost like talc, that blows away as you shoot. If someone is finding this "gummy", I think you're using too much oil in your gun.

Blazers are not the most accurate .22 rounds, but they are so cheap and dependable that I now use them exclusively in all my .22 semi rifles and pistols.

Keith Rogan is offline  
Old February 18, 2001, 03:39 PM   #24
Sub MOA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 28, 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 292
If accuracy is your quest, try some Remington .22 Target(green and turquoise box). It's just shy of $2/box so it's a tad more expensive, but I think you'll be pleased with the results.

Sub
Sub MOA is offline  
Old February 21, 2001, 11:10 AM   #25
38Mike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2000
Location: Wichita, Ks.
Posts: 396
I picked up a new Buckmark Monday..

got a brick of CCI Blazer ammo for $9.00..

good stuff, fired 200 rounds without a hiccup..pretty clean too..


Mike M.
38Mike is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13119 seconds with 9 queries