The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 9, 2011, 04:38 AM   #1
scoobydoo6906
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2005
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 299
re-chambering a .308 barrel

say you have a barrel with a .308 chamber on it... now say you would like a .30-06... could you have the chamber lopped off and a 06 reamed into the .308 barrel and be ok? now would that be cost effective?
__________________
Remington 760 BDL .270, yugo M70B1 , Remington 870 wingmaster, remington 700 ADL 30-06, Pre 64 Marlin 336 30-30, springfield xd-9 sub compact, Sig Sauer 226, F&N FNP-45, Ruger 10/22, XD-45 4in, XD-9 4in
scoobydoo6906 is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 08:01 AM   #2
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 5,481
If the chamber is too short [308 has a short receiver] a 30-06 won't feed properly !!
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 10:10 AM   #3
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,462
I think he meant that if the action is too short the magazine won't hold and feed the longer cartridges and the bolt may not open far enough for single feeding to be easy or for ejection to work properly. But as to the barrel itself, it depends on the contour of the original barrel. Most barrels are thicker over the chamber area. If you cut off too much you may not have enough of the wider portion of the metal left for a longer chamber. On the other hand, if you have a barrel that is cylindrical for a certain length or is just longer than necessary at the chamber OD, as some barrels are, you may no issue with this. You don't need thick metal over the neck.

As it turns out, despite the greater taper of the .30-06, you only have to cut off 1.06" of an in-spec, maximum tolerance .308 chamber to get enough metal to be sure a tight .30-06 reamer will clean it up. If the chamber is more average in dimensions, an inch will do it. If it is tight, 0.8 inches will do it. So, give or take, if your contour allows you to lose an inch without getting too thin at the shoulder of the cartridge and if your action is long enough to work with the longer cartridge, then this can be done.

Whether or not it is worth it, is another matter. You need a gunsmith that normally does the work of setting back and rechambering barrels. I've always done that for myself, and don't know what current prices are, but expect it to cost as much as installing a lower grade new replacement barrel. This could be worth it to recycle a custom barrel but not a for a cheap one.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 10:50 AM   #4
dawico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2009
Location: Lampasas, TX
Posts: 326
Ok, so I have to ask this. Why couldn't you just run a 30.06 reamer in the barrel without cutting it off (given there is enough thickness left after the chamber to be safe)? Since you can resize 30.06 cases down to 308s, the 308 chamber should be smaller than a 30.06 chamber all the way from the boltface, correct? Would this not work for some reason? I am not trying to hijack the thread, just give another option if it would work.
dawico is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 10:58 AM   #5
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,462
The .308 is shorter but has less taper to the sides, so it is wider at the junction of the case sides and shoulder. If you just run the .30-06 reamer in, you'll be left with a small step where the .308 shoulder's wide spot was. It will actually chamber and fire .30-06 just fine, but your sizing die will really work the heck out of that step and just below it, and that can lead to cases separating just below the shoulder on subsequent firings.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member

Last edited by Unclenick; February 9, 2011 at 11:04 AM.
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 11:49 AM   #6
mapsjanhere
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,384
In regards to cost effectiveness, I have to ask, why are you doing it? The 30-06 is barely more potent than the 308, and if you really want just the ability to put heavier bullets on a 308, get a longer throat reamed and hand load what you need. Alternatively, if your rifle can handle the pressures, get a 300 WSM or RSAUM done, for some true performance upgrades without needed to cut the barrel (the chambers are wider than 308 at all points afaik).
__________________
F 135 - the right choice
mapsjanhere is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 07:37 PM   #7
scoobydoo6906
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2005
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 299
the reason i ask is i see lots of varmint take off .308 barrels from remington 700's. i have a 700 in .30-06 that i want to re-barrel to a varmint weight and was wandering if it would work and if it would be cost effective to do so. remington barrels are top notch so i don't see anything really gained by buying a top end match barrel if you could re-chamber for less.
__________________
Remington 760 BDL .270, yugo M70B1 , Remington 870 wingmaster, remington 700 ADL 30-06, Pre 64 Marlin 336 30-30, springfield xd-9 sub compact, Sig Sauer 226, F&N FNP-45, Ruger 10/22, XD-45 4in, XD-9 4in
scoobydoo6906 is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 09:17 PM   #8
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Starkville, MS
Posts: 5,090
If you want to do that, just keep it as a 308 barrel on a long action. That combo will work just fine. You can even seat your long bullets shallower and they will still fit in that long-action magazine.
Doyle is offline  
Old February 13, 2011, 02:05 AM   #9
lefteyedom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 332
I have a 700 Remington long action that I replaced the factory 270 barrel with a 308 heavy Sendro barrel. It works great, this is basally what the army m-24 has been for years.

The heart your problem is barrel quality and action trueness. If you want your 700 to shoot like a target rifle you are going to need to spend a little money on the whole package.

Instead of trying to rechamber a Remington factory sporting weight barrel spend the money and get a good quality custom barrel. Douglas, Hart, there are a dozen good ones.

Then have the action trued and the barrel installed. Then have the action glass beaded into the stock (pillared as well). After all of this you will have the rifle that you really want. It wont be cheap but it will be worth it.

Sorry there is no cheap way to get a super accurate rifle. (though buying a savage is an idea)
__________________
Superman, you are a mean drunk
lefteyedom is offline  
Old February 13, 2011, 11:08 AM   #10
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,462
Lefteydom,

Is the Sendero .308 barrel a custom barrel made with the Obermeyer 5-R rifling profile (5 lands and grooves; sloped land edges)? That's what's on the M-24; its not a Remington-produced barrel. I've been astonished to read of the life of the M-24 barrels, some still shooting half moa at close to 20,000 rounds.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 13, 2011, 02:37 PM   #11
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 19,967
Unclenick is correct on just rechambering. I have seen a rifle which was rechambered from .308 to .30-'06 just by running the '06 reamer into the chamber. It worked fine and the owner didn't reload (at that time .30 GI was $3.00 a hundred) so the "step" in the case didn't bother him at all.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old February 13, 2011, 03:05 PM   #12
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 2,786
and every 308 W chamber I have seen or know of still has some of the 308 W chamber that the 30/08 reamer did not clean up, I suggest the 30 /06 Ackley Improved or the 30 Gibbs, the shoulder of the 308 W is .011 thousand larger in diameter than the 30/06 when measured from the head of the case to the shoulder.

The shoulder (ring) will allow the shooter/reloader to use the ring imprint on the case to track skid, as in case stretch and skid marks, everyone insist their cases stretch, so I assume the case skids as it stretches. I have never seen the marks but if the case stretches the skid marks must be there.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old February 13, 2011, 03:39 PM   #13
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 2,786
Funnier still is "The firing pin drives the case forward"

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old February 14, 2011, 01:12 AM   #14
scoobydoo6906
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2005
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 299
I have considered the 30-06 Ackley Improved. I planned on having the everything trued and squared up. to be honest a sporter weight can be just accurate as a varmint barrel if it had the same stuff done to it. if the barrel vibrates the same every time thats the name of the game to make a accurate rifle. the barrel could vibrate a foot in theory if it does it the same every time it will punch tiny holes. its just easier to do with a heavier barrel. does anybody have any info on the 06 ackley or knows where to get it? if I go the ackley route I see me getting some reloading stuff because I have never seen anything for any ackley loading like brass.
__________________
Remington 760 BDL .270, yugo M70B1 , Remington 870 wingmaster, remington 700 ADL 30-06, Pre 64 Marlin 336 30-30, springfield xd-9 sub compact, Sig Sauer 226, F&N FNP-45, Ruger 10/22, XD-45 4in, XD-9 4in
scoobydoo6906 is offline  
Old February 14, 2011, 01:51 AM   #15
20thru45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2011
Location: In the first foothills of the Cascade mountains outside Portland OR
Posts: 155
scooby,

The 30-06 AI is a very old wildcat that has dies reamers and gauges readily available. Brass will probably have to be fireformed from standard 06 brass and then reloaded for your regular shooting or hunting rounds. Ballistically you'll be right there with 300 H&H mag or touch less. Debatable wether or not its worth it over standard 06
20thru45 is offline  
Old February 14, 2011, 01:46 PM   #16
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 19,967
Depending in part on the rifle, getting the AI round to feed may require modifying the feed rails in the receiver due to the different shape of the case shoulder.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old February 14, 2011, 05:51 PM   #17
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,462
I don't believe the .30-06 was one of the rounds that benefited as much as some others from Ackley's treatment. Folks used to complain it just made them use more powder to get to the same velocity as .30-06 or maybe 50 fps more. But that was back nearer P.O. Ackley's day, and now there are newer powders to choose from, so it may do a little better. I haven't looked at it for awhile.

What the A.I. should do is get you around the step issue and the case life of the A.I.'s is always pretty good. One of the features Ackley built into his design concept is that they be safe to fire the commercial parent cartridges in to get a formed case, even at full pressure, so you don't need special forming dies. You just buy the reloading dies and use them on the ejected cases of the parent rounds.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 14, 2011, 06:59 PM   #18
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Starkville, MS
Posts: 5,090
Lets go back to the OPs question. He is wanting to put a .308 chambered barrel (because they are very available I'm guessing) onto a receiver that is currently a 30-06. I go back to my point. I think the best alternative is to leave it as a long-actioned .308. You wouldn't gain much at all by attempting to rechamber the barrel. Just screw in the barrel, set the headspace, and shoot it.
Doyle is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 06:49 AM   #19
scoobydoo6906
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2005
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 299
I would like to stay with the 06 because I hunt elk and heavier bullets are needed.
__________________
Remington 760 BDL .270, yugo M70B1 , Remington 870 wingmaster, remington 700 ADL 30-06, Pre 64 Marlin 336 30-30, springfield xd-9 sub compact, Sig Sauer 226, F&N FNP-45, Ruger 10/22, XD-45 4in, XD-9 4in
scoobydoo6906 is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 09:49 AM   #20
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 2,786
Shades of differences: The neck on the 30/06 is shorter than the neck of the Ackley Improved version meaning when a 30/06 chamber is reamed to to the Ackley Improved chamber not all of the old chamber is removed. In the perfect world the Ackley chamber is cut as a new chamber, in the other world the chamber is cut with an existing 30/06 chamber, some drawings list the difference in length between the two case necks as being .030 thousands, the Ackley being the longest.

.030 thousands and it's significances, The old saying that has been handed down since the Internet is not true "Ackley designed the Ackley Improved chamber to head space factory ammo". That part is true but when a 30/06 chamber is reamed to the Ackley Version the shoulder/neck juncture is not removed and if the chamber had XXX amount of head space before reaming factory ammo when fired will still have xxx head space.

Back to the perfect world, the short neck of factory ammo is sized (head spaces) when chambered in the Ackley chamber, when fired the rest of the shoulder and case body is (blown out and forward to form the rest of the shoulder, keeping up with two thoughts at one time, part of the shoulder is formed when the case is chambered) formed, and when blown out the case gets shorter, it does not stretch and the firing pin does not drive the case forward (on my rifles).

F. Guffey

Then the question becomes "Why would I waste your time with details"? 'Shades of difference' the availability of dies and reamers', Ackley neck length is .419, the length of the neck on the 30/06 is .389 + or - a few, point? one die can not size cases for both chambers. For the reamer to remove all of the 30/06 chamber the barrel should be set back, then the 30 Gibbs becomes an attractive choice, the Gibbs reamer removes all of the chamber, but when the Gibbs reamer is used, check the length of the chamber, My Gibbs chamber retains the length of the 30/06, there is an up side, the neck of the Gibbs is .217 + or-, in my opinion the neck needs all the help it can get, if 30/06 cases are used to form the Gibbs cases forget the length advantage, after forming and firing the Gibbs will be .040 thousands shorter than the parent case, because the case does not stretch nor does the firing pin drive the case forward, nor is the shoulder driven forward .202 thousands, part of the shoulder becomes part of the case body and part of the neck becomes part of the shoulder, all of this forming shortens the case when the case body is blown out when formed.

And I still think it is funny, the case, powder, bullet and primer accelerates to a speed equal to the speed of the firing pin to escape the strike, only on my rifles, my primers are crushed before the rest of the components know the primer was crushed.

http://www.z-hat.com/Cylinder.htm

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 01:01 PM   #21
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doyle
Lets go back to the OPs question. He is wanting to put a .308 chambered barrel (because they are very available I'm guessing) onto a receiver that is currently a 30-06. . .
It's the other way around. The OP has the .308 and wants .30-06. That's why all the action length and reaming considerations and alternate chambering suggestions.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 04:54 PM   #22
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 2,786
Unclenick, and the part about lobbing off the chamber of the barrel,, there will not be enough metal left to cut a new chamber nor enough metal left to cut the threads for the shank.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 08:26 PM   #23
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Starkville, MS
Posts: 5,090
Quote:
It's the other way around. The OP has the .308 and wants .30-06. That's why all the action length and reaming considerations and alternate chambering suggestions.
Dooh. That's what I get for not paying good attention in class.
Doyle is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 09:05 PM   #24
scoobydoo6906
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2005
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 299
ok to relieve all confusion... I have a remington 700 chambered in 30-06. I am interested in buying a take off .308 barrel from and sps varmint or police model and re-chambering it to 30-06 or 30-06 AI or maybe .30 gibbs.
__________________
Remington 760 BDL .270, yugo M70B1 , Remington 870 wingmaster, remington 700 ADL 30-06, Pre 64 Marlin 336 30-30, springfield xd-9 sub compact, Sig Sauer 226, F&N FNP-45, Ruger 10/22, XD-45 4in, XD-9 4in
scoobydoo6906 is offline  
Old February 15, 2011, 10:03 PM   #25
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Starkville, MS
Posts: 5,090
Quote:
ok to relieve all confusion... I have a remington 700 chambered in 30-06. I am interested in buying a take off .308 barrel from and sps varmint or police model and re-chambering it to 30-06 or 30-06 AI or maybe .30 gibbs
It turns out I was paying attention after all. Why not keep the new barrel .308? The ballistic advantage of a 30-06 really only comes into play if you want to launch bullets greater than about 200grn. Certainly, the cost of rechambering would be much higher than just finding a 30-06 barrel in the first place.
Doyle is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11990 seconds with 9 queries