![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Posts: 197
|
AR Mags
In competition I only use 20 round magazines, like most AR shooters. The 30 rounders just don't work well when shooting prone, as I can't snuggle in low with the rifle without the mag touching the ground (which may then cause a double feed). But this is only my preference...I do hear of shooters who actually use the 30 rounder to rest on their chest when shooting offhand, and shoot from a higher position when at prone.
I understand why the military moved strictly to 30 rounders - but WHY must they destroy all the 20 rounders? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,750
|
They didn't, most units kept the 20 rounders and reserved them for the range qualifications.
__________________
http://www.armsmaster.net-a.googlepages.com http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/f...aster270/Guns/ Retired LE, M.P., Sr. M.P. Investigator F.B.I. Trained Rangemaster/Firearms Instructor & Armorer, Presently Forensic Document Examiner for D.H.S. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Posts: 197
|
True, but recently a friend of mine in the service was telling me that when they came across 20 rounders they were being crushed and replaced by 30 rounders - even for range use only.
Any reason to not keep 20 rounders in service? Going from the m16 to the carbine for CQB operations was effective, seems like a 20 rounder on a carbine would reduce the profile even more, making the weapon even more versatile around corners and such. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|