The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old December 14, 2008, 02:39 AM   #1
Elite Doberman
Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 15
Hooking an electric drill up to a gatling trigger...legal?

Someone told me about a guy who hooked up an electric drill to the gat trigger accessory, which meant he just held down the drill switch for auto fire. Is this legal? even though the trigger is still being pressed multiple times by the mechanism, would the drill button be considered to be the "trigger" in this case?
Elite Doberman is offline  
Old December 14, 2008, 02:53 AM   #2
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 18,346
The trigger is what the shooter operates to fire the gun.
If the gun is designed so that the shooter can operate the trigger a single time and get more than one shot then the gun is a machinegun.
Unless it was manufactured and registered as a machinegun before 1986 then it's an illegal machinegun in the United States which means that the person posessing it is a felon unless he has an FFL that permits him to sell machineguns to LE/Military and the person who made it is a felon unless he has federal licensing that allows him to manufacture machineguns for LE/Military/research purposes.
__________________
Did you know that there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old December 14, 2008, 11:57 AM   #3
raymond-
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 179
how do those Hellfire type trigger manipulaters get around this definition?
__________________
raymond-
47.5N 122.2W
raymond- is offline  
Old December 14, 2008, 12:54 PM   #4
Joat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 31, 2008
Location: Dayton, TX
Posts: 383
I am in process of building a gatling gun. In preparation of this project I spoke to the ATF technical branch and was told that while a Gatling gun was a title 1 firearm, adding a motor would turn it into a regulated item (the term used was "GE minigun type" firearm).

Joat
__________________
All things being equal, fat people use more soap. (I know I am one.) High speed, low drag does not even come close to describing ME.
Joat is offline  
Old December 14, 2008, 01:47 PM   #5
Ridge_Runner_5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,886
If I am understanding correctly, that makes the gun operated by a machine, which is a no-no?
Ridge_Runner_5 is offline  
Old December 14, 2008, 03:32 PM   #6
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,320
Quote:
how do those Hellfire type trigger manipulaters get around this definition?
For the same reason that crank operated Gatling guns are legal. You need continuous action from the shooter, in the form of cranking, to keep the gun firing.

To put it more simply. It's the government, it doesn't have to make sense.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old December 14, 2008, 05:50 PM   #7
Hkmp5sd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
Quote:
If I am understanding correctly, that makes the gun operated by a machine, which is a no-no?
It isn't the being attached to a machine that is illegal. It is the more than one round fired per trigger pull that is illegal. You can attach an electro-mechanical device to your gun as long as whatever you use for a switch only fires one round each time you actuate it.
Hkmp5sd is offline  
Old December 15, 2008, 02:11 AM   #8
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 18,346
Correct.
__________________
Did you know that there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 07:37 PM   #9
jmorris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 1,604
Quote:
how do those Hellfire type trigger manipulaters get around this definition?
The simple answer is that they don’t work or at least don’t work very well. For example the Akins Accelerator was a stock designed to simplify bump firing, however, it worked so after 3years of production, with approval by the ATF, it was ruled a machinegun and everyone that had one was now in violation of the law. Here is a link if you are not familiar. http://good-times.webshots.com/album/562229300LYFlmJ


Also declared a machinegun by the ATF is a key ring and a shoelace (see photo below). Before you ask, I don’t know who took the photo and I don’t even own a rifle of that type.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg stringtrick1ev.jpg (124.1 KB, 675 views)
jmorris is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 08:51 PM   #10
4thPointofContact
Junior member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Posts: 197
Didn't the BATFE came to their senses a couple years ago and rule that "upon further consideration" the string was no longer to be considered a machine gun?
4thPointofContact is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 10:52 PM   #11
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,320
Quote:
Didn't the BATFE came to their senses a couple years ago and rule that "upon further consideration" the string was no longer to be considered a machine gun?
No they didn't.

If there is one thing I have learned, you NEVER as the ATF for clarification on ANYTHING. "Gem-TAX" really screwed over every suppressor owner when they asked the ATF to clarify a regulation. It's no joke when people say they make it up as they go.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 10:45 AM   #12
jmorris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 1,604
Another point to consider, I’ve actually made a Gatling type trigger mine was for a semi 1919. In order to obtain proper function (not skip firing) I had to make the actuator “float” about 62 degrees on the crank spindle so as soon as the hammer dropped the trigger was in the proper position for reset. The crank I built fires 6 times per revolution so you have to slow down not to exceed the rifles capabilities (just over 1 revolution per second and it’s around the same speed as the auto version 400-500rpm). Even if you only had one cam most electric drills would be too fast. Here is a video and some photos are in the same album.

http://s121.photobucket.com/albums/o...ent=jM1919.flv
jmorris is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 04:37 PM   #13
Hkmp5sd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
Quote:
No they didn't.
Yes, they did.


Hkmp5sd is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 06:51 PM   #14
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,320
Don't worry, the ATF will reverse that "ruling" if it suits their fancy.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 10:09 PM   #15
jmorris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 1,604
The important part of that letter is “However, when the string is added to a semiautomatic firearm as you proposed in order to increase the cycling rate of that rifle, the result is a firearm that fires automatically and consequently would be classified as a machinegun.”

So, the string it self is not a machinegun, however; when implemented as in the photo above the result is a machinegun and remains illegal.
jmorris is offline  
Old December 18, 2008, 10:30 AM   #16
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 7,858
How many times do you have to pull the trigger on the drill to get the gun to fire multiple shots? One pull - multiple shots, you go to jail.
Skans is offline  
Old December 18, 2008, 10:31 AM   #17
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 7,858
Basically if it goes Bam Bam Bam Bam Bam Bam rappidly and your finger doesn't get progressively tired, you go to jail.
Skans is offline  
Old January 8, 2009, 01:56 AM   #18
straightshoooter
Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2009
Posts: 15
what about the clamp on hand crank?
__________________
know your constitution
straightshoooter is offline  
Old January 8, 2009, 08:50 AM   #19
Hkmp5sd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
As long as it is you operating a mechanical device, it is fine. You are technically still pulling the trigger on the gun. With an electrical device, the "trigger" moves from the gun to the "on" button and you only need press the on button once to get multiple shots.
Hkmp5sd is offline  
Old January 8, 2009, 09:30 AM   #20
jmorris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 1,604
Quote:
what about the clamp on hand crank?
I’m not sure what the question is; however, the only clamps on the crank I built are two double split set collars and two regular set collars. One of the double split set collars clamps the device to the grip the other clamps the handle to the spindle (it’s not permanent, so it can be configured for a lefty). The one piece set collars allow fine tuning of the trigger link.

Oh, if you are asking if it’s legal, it is, as are regular Gatling guns. You have to do something for each shot fired, so pushing a button to run a motor continuously is out.

jmorris is offline  
Old January 14, 2009, 10:28 AM   #21
TEDDY
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2006
Location: MANNING SC
Posts: 837
Gatling Guns

FUNNY NOT HA HA.how the courts change.before WW2 the courts ruled a machine gun had to fire to be a machine gun.if it was broke or welded it was not a machine gun,thats where DEWAT came frome.now a part is a machine gun.thank goodness I wont live to see the country go down the tubes.the gun owners won't stand to gether and vote look at this election many GO voted for obama "for change" then they will bitch at the NRA fornot doing enuf.
TEDDY is offline  
Old January 15, 2009, 08:22 AM   #22
ROFOCALE
Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2009
Posts: 21
Could he worse then Obama. Could be the clinto admin all over again. And the Assault weapons ban would be back with no doubts.
ROFOCALE is offline  
Old January 15, 2009, 09:02 AM   #23
PTK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 442
Quote:
Could be the clinto admin all over again.
Did you even LOOK at Obama's cabinet? It IS the Clinton administration all over again.
PTK is offline  
Old January 15, 2009, 09:57 AM   #24
Johnny Guest
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 28, 1999
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,116
As so often happens - - -

A thread started with a fairly simple technical question becomes a soapbox for shrill political ranting.

Folks, can't we PLEASE stick to the subject? Take your politicizing and mudslinging elsewhere. This is NOT the forum for that stuff.

CLOSED

Johnny
__________________
MOLON LABE!
Amendment II ensures the rest of the Bill of Rights.

Blog: Expert Witness
Johnny Guest is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13322 seconds with 10 queries