The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 12, 2008, 12:50 PM   #1
JKump
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 1998
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 423
.270 ?

A friend of mine just got a Ruger Mk77 .270 for deer hunting. He bought two boxes of Federal Fusion ammo 130 grain and the 150 grain. Which one will be better for deer hunting? I hunt with a 308 and could not give any advice, however, I have heard the 130 grain is the way to go. Any comments either way.
__________________
Live everyday as if it is your last! Because someday you will be right.

"Everyone has a game plan until they get punched in the mouth".
JKump is offline  
Old November 12, 2008, 01:15 PM   #2
Daryl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
Either bullet weight will work fine.

I always prefered the 130's when I used a .270 Win. The shoot a little faster, and a little flatter.

Daryl
Daryl is offline  
Old November 12, 2008, 01:17 PM   #3
Water-Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2008
Location: N. Georgia
Posts: 1,564
Both work well.
__________________
PROUD TO BE A VETERAN
Water-Man is offline  
Old November 12, 2008, 03:06 PM   #4
YARDDOG(1)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: GATOR COUNTRY HA HA HA!
Posts: 690
130 wqrks best IMO
__________________
There's a GATOR in the bushes & She's Callin my name
>Molly Hatchett<
YARDDOG(1) is offline  
Old November 12, 2008, 03:31 PM   #5
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 5,507
My take on it was use 130 for deer and smaller, and use 150's for elk. That has served me well in the past when I used the .270 for elk. Truthfully use the ammunition that groups the best regardless of weight. Bambi will not know what grain of bullet that was used.
taylorce1 is offline  
Old November 12, 2008, 03:43 PM   #6
bullspotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 304
I shoot the 130 out of my 270. Great weight, Never needed a 150gr bullet for anything i hunt, even elk. Not saying a 150 is a bad choice though, I just like the 130s. I shoot the same loads for everything i hunt with my 270.
bullspotter is offline  
Old November 12, 2008, 04:31 PM   #7
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Starkville, MS (new to MS)
Posts: 4,842
Shoot the one that works best in your gun. In my Win '70 .270, I can shoot Remington 130 PSP and Federal Classic 130 PSP interchangably (same point of impact). Winchester 130's group equally well, but the point of impact is several inches off from the other two therefore they are not interchangeable (I would have to rezero the scope).

However, if I load up 150's, my groups suddenly start looking more like something a shotgun would shoot. It just doesn't like 150's.
Doyle is online now  
Old November 12, 2008, 04:41 PM   #8
Stiofan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Location: Panhandle, Idaho
Posts: 691
My rifle is pretty accurate with both but I pretty much keep to 130g now. The .270 made it's reputation on flat shooting 130, and it used the round's ballistics to it's advantage.

If I was only going out for Moose or even elk, I'd probably re-sight in for 150. For an all around bullet, 130 is probably best though.
Stiofan is offline  
Old November 12, 2008, 04:55 PM   #9
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: 1B ID
Posts: 6,843
Some .270 Winchester barrels have a hard time stabilizing 150 grain bullets.
Most barrels have a hard time with anything over 150 grains.
The 1:10" (common) rate of twist is optimal for 120-140 grain projectiles.

For deer, 130 grain bullets will be just fine.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old November 12, 2008, 05:12 PM   #10
TheNatureBoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2007
Posts: 1,184
Based on everything I've ever read about the .270, it performs very well when a 130 grain pill is used.
TheNatureBoy is offline  
Old November 12, 2008, 05:48 PM   #11
The Terminator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 3, 2002
Location: Georgia, 35 miles Northwest of the armpit
Posts: 946
Another reason that the 130's work better on small deer, whitetail, is that the copper jacket is thinner on the bullet, making the bullet less likely to pass through the deer, and more likely to expand on the thin skinned, smaller deer.

The reverse is true for the 150 grain loads, thicker copper jacket will penetrate deeper and expand more slowly, making it better suited for larger deer, such as elk.

This, from one of my books by Jack O'Connor. I don't believe just anything because a gun writer says it, but, he was a hunter who wrote from his own experiences. Best -
__________________
The Terminator
John 3:16 (I hope to see You over there.)
The Terminator is offline  
Old November 17, 2008, 11:04 AM   #12
unlearned69
Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2006
Posts: 15
My wife, mother, and I have had great success with 130 grain projectiles. My mother shot a massive bull elk last year, and the 130 grain pill did jiust fine.
unlearned69 is offline  
Old November 23, 2008, 01:05 PM   #13
metalheadlead
Member
 
Join Date: February 10, 2008
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 21
my opinion, the 130 psp has more velocity and energy, fits the .270 well-use it. had no problem taking 240lb. Pa. buck last season at 130+ yards.
metalheadlead is offline  
Old November 23, 2008, 01:45 PM   #14
Dallas Jack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 25, 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 381
I've had good luck with the 130 grain soft point. (I think my gun likes the 130 over the 150)
Dallas Jack
Dallas Jack is offline  
Old November 23, 2008, 05:38 PM   #15
jdscholer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2008
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 895
I've got an old Ruger 77 in 270, and have shot several elk with it. I always reloaded Speer 130 gr. boat-tails. They kill elk ded, but never seem to exit. I like a bullet to expand and exit for that gory red blood trail to follow.
So, I got some Speer 150 gr. Grand Slams. Shot a big cow about 100 yds. out. Still no exit. The hide on an elk must stretch like rubber on the far side. I almost always find the bullet right under the skin. Maybe I expect too much. The elk all died within a reasonable distance and except for the blood trail thing I've got no complaints. btw 56 and 55 gr. IMR 4831, CCI 200's. jd
__________________
"We're all dummies, just in different ways." Old Okie Philosopher
jdscholer is offline  
Old November 23, 2008, 06:41 PM   #16
ActivShootr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 15, 2007
Posts: 1,040
Every deer I have shot with 130gr .270 has dropped dead in it's tracks.
ActivShootr is offline  
Old November 24, 2008, 01:08 AM   #17
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 5,630
Take both rounds to the range. Hunt with the one that groups better.
Buzzcook is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09586 seconds with 9 queries