The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 14, 2008, 09:12 PM   #1
Keltyke
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 2,933
Semi-auto pistol porting

Let's hear some opinions.

My wife has a Colt Defender which has quite a kick. She recently bought a Springfield 1911 Ultra Compact V10, the one with the ported barrel. Now, before anyone points out that these are different guns, I'll point out that they are almost identical. The Springfield has about half the kick of the Colt. I believe it's due to the porting. Now to my question.

I have a Steyr S-40 that is a honey to shoot. Very controllable recoil and just fine as is. However, anything can better. If porting this gun would have the same effect as the porting on the Springfield, that 'd be great. Does anyone have an opinion or experience with ported semi-autos? Is it worth the cost and effort on an untried gun?

Basically, should I do it or not? Would the benefits equal the expense?
Keltyke is offline  
Old July 15, 2008, 10:53 AM   #2
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,339
I used to build ported 1911s for folks way back when. They seemed to work reliably and reduce felt recoil perceivably. Recently, it was pointed out to me that there is no way ported barrels for the 1911 will have any recoil reduction effect because of the low operating pressure of the round. So, you decide: experience saying it works, or people saying it won't work because they "figgered it out" on paper.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old July 15, 2008, 01:02 PM   #3
Keltyke
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 2,933
Quote:
So, you decide: experience saying it works, or people saying it won't work because they "figgered it out" on paper.
Thanks for the reply. Now, if someone can tell me if a non-ported Springfield has significantly less recoil than a Colt Defender...

Personally, I believe the porting couldn't hurt and could possibly help, + it looks cool. Makes the gun more personal.
Keltyke is offline  
Old July 19, 2008, 02:21 PM   #4
Peter M. Eick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 3, 1999
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,806


My Springfield P9 ultra is ported and I later got a barrel fitted to it that was not ported. Now I can swap barrels and test how much porting matters. In this case it is the same gun, same ammo, same everything but the barrel and the ports. Ports make a big difference in the real world for a high pressure round.

Those that say otherwise either have not had this type of experience (ie high pressure round with same everything) or have very unique guns.
__________________
10mm and 357sig, the best things to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Old July 19, 2008, 05:23 PM   #5
Keltyke
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 2,933
Quote:
Now I can swap barrels and test how much porting matters.
OK, now how about the results? How much difference did the porting make. Do you think it would make a difference on .40 S&W?
Keltyke is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 09:12 AM   #6
Alleykat
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2007
Posts: 3,668
Would make more of a difference in the higher-pressure .40 than in the lower-pressure .45; however, I agree with Scorch, in that my experience is that my compensated (not ported) .45 barrels significantly tame slide speed and muzzle flip.
Alleykat is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 11:17 AM   #7
Peter M. Eick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 3, 1999
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,806
My p9 Ultra is a 40. It makes a HUGE difference. My wife basically took this gun from me because she did not like the sharp snappy recoil of the MD96 and preferred the push of the P9. It is louder yes, but that can be dealt with so she shot it a lot. First time she tried it without the ports her comment was the gun is broken.

You go from a snappy sharp rap in the web of the hand without the ports to a more gradual shove with the ports. Put some 135's that are book max reloads with the right powder (one of the slower ones like AA7) and you can get the barrel to recoil down. It is neat to be able to see the target after you fire the gun instead of having the gun obscure it.

I don't really have that many pictures to show the difference. Maybe I should pull the barrels and show you the results. Here are guns in question though.




As an aside, I have shot over 8,261 rounds down the P9 and changed the barrel out at round 5675. I will try and pull it apart and shoot some new pictures. I have not shot the gun in a long time (10/24/05) as I have gotten tired of chasing brass and now I shoot more revolvers and autoloaders.
__________________
10mm and 357sig, the best things to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 11:34 AM   #8
Slopemeno
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2007
Posts: 2,265
A few guys in my action shooting league back in the 90's were shooting 135's in their .40's, and they swore by them. That bullet weight/pressure combo really makes the comp work.
Slopemeno is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 05:26 PM   #9
Peter M. Eick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 3, 1999
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,806
I found that 135 JHP's and 155 FMJ's worked best in my guns. I used to buy Winchester 155 FMJ's in 2000 rnd boxes and was heartbroken when they stopped selling them. The 155's were accurate and could really be driven well. Both really worked the ports well and shot great.

Unfortunately for the 40's I moved up to 10mm and never looked back.
__________________
10mm and 357sig, the best things to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07429 seconds with 9 queries