The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 12, 2008, 11:27 PM   #1
Dust Monkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 723
80 series parts removal to 70 series ???

I know it can be done. A small frame slot from brownells, removal of the 80 series parts. My question: the half cock on an 80 series hammer vs a 70 series hammer is a little different. For safety concerns, if I were to change a 80 to a 70, would I need to change out the hammer as well?

Thanks I'm advance.
__________________
Civilian Date: 14 Century
1 : a specialist in Roman or modern civil law.
If you are not subject to the UCMJ, you are a Civilian. I don't care one bit what updated dictionaries say.
Dust Monkey is offline  
Old July 13, 2008, 12:42 AM   #2
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,340
If you change to the Series 70 sear, you need to change the hammer, too, and vice versa.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old July 13, 2008, 05:31 PM   #3
Harry Bonar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2004
Location: In the Vincent, Ohio general area.
Posts: 1,804
80-70 series

Sir;
I usually change the sear and hammer in that conversion, and, of course, the firing pin safety.
That intermediate notch in you hammer isn't a "half-cock" notch - it's a safety notch so that if you "follow" your sear is caught there, many are just flats.
Harry B.
Harry Bonar is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 12:09 PM   #4
Floppy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 17, 2008
Posts: 3
Having a series 80 myself I happened to save a website post that discussed it in detail,I haven't done it myself but perhaps the information will help you.

http://freepatriot.com/removeseries80.php

It's a pretty detailed description including pictures.
Floppy is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 03:23 PM   #5
Tom2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,648
Please clarify for me the urge to dump the 80 series guts. I know that if you are trying to set up a very light target type trigger, it might complicate getting it nice and crisp, but for combat pistols, what is the drawback? Just one more thing to prevent a drop discharge IMO. If you had a prewar gun with the scarce firing pin block safety feature, would you take that out too? Or is that considered classic as compared to the 80 version? I have had a prewar gun with that feature and a current 80 series gun. Is it something like the S&W lock we all hate, some claims that it will mess up and jam?
__________________
Your gun is like your nose, it is just wrong for someone else to pick it for you!
Tom2 is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 03:44 PM   #6
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Posts: 5,420
Even though Series 80 is the most proven of the 1911 firing pin blocks, it still adds parts to the gun, and additional parts means less reliable function. The likelihood that a well-maintained 1911 will discharge if dropped is so close to zero, for a number of reasons, that compromising the gun's reliability for the hypothetical safety isn't a fair swap. That's the major reason people don't like it. I don't like it because it makes detail stripping a pain (actually, it's the reassembly that's a pain).
RickB is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 04:22 PM   #7
Tom2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,648
Well can anyone cite an instance where an 80 has not worked due to a firing pin safety malfunction, not due to improper assembly of the linkage, or is it theoretically that the added safety could maybe cause a problem like that? I don't think people are going in droves to have comparable internal safeties removed from Walthers, Berettas, Sigs, etc. to "improve reliabilty" although I do know about yanking the mag safety in HP's. There is a safety notch in the front of the 1911 hammer to engage a dropped hammer fall, is there not, and so is there on a Colt SAA. But no one seems to trust the safety notch all that much on a SAA, claiming it might shear off or be worn from use.
__________________
Your gun is like your nose, it is just wrong for someone else to pick it for you!
Tom2 is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 09:02 PM   #8
Slopemeno
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2007
Posts: 2,265
I worked for a shop that built a couple of hundred 5" and compguns based on the Series-80 system. The Series-80 guns all left the shop with the series-80gear, and had triggers appropriate for the task (competition or defensive use).

The ONLY time I ever saw an issue was when someone would attempt to "improve' on their trigger job by reducing the overtravel adjustment in the trigger, which would cause the S-80 plunger to get beat up.

I also knew a dedicated carrier who dropped his Series 70 gun on concrete in an encounter, causing a discharge when the gun landed on the muzzle. Kinda made me think.
Slopemeno is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 10:22 PM   #9
Wildalaska
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,174
Quote:
Even though Series 80 is the most proven of the 1911 firing pin blocks, it still adds parts to the gun, and additional parts means less reliable function.
Bullpucky.

WildnonsenseAlaska TM
Wildalaska is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 04:07 PM   #10
RsqVet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Posts: 2,322
The series 80 parts are really no big deal, a very nice trigger can easily be had with them.

HOWEVER if you don't want them, it does make the gun easier to work on, and the trade off is very minimal. Just how minimal the risk of a ND is the subject of a number of threads and has been done to death in my opinion.
RsqVet is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09775 seconds with 9 queries