The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 6, 2007, 11:02 AM   #1
Lurper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
Shooting in "cadence".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN0rTnL1fJs
Lurper is offline  
Old December 6, 2007, 01:01 PM   #2
Rob Pincus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Hotels
Posts: 3,677
Lurper,

I think the principle expressed in your vid is spot on. Time between shots should be dictated by recoil management and the amount of time it takes to get the necessary deviation control for the given shot, not an objective pace or "cadence".

Good Job.

-RJP
Rob Pincus is offline  
Old December 6, 2007, 04:52 PM   #3
Tanzer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2007
Posts: 884
Makes sense to me (keeping in mind that he's got a lot of experience).
__________________
Only the ignorant find ignorance to be bliss. Only those of us who know better will suffer from it.
Tanzer is offline  
Old December 6, 2007, 08:06 PM   #4
ISC
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,982
I would agree except for the very specialized instance where you are in a competition that you specifically train for where you have a timer dictating when your shots must end and you need to pace yourself to get off every shot. In that instance you are better off getting off all 6 shots even if a couple are only 4s than getting 5 5's and not getting one off.

just playing devil's advocate.
ISC is offline  
Old December 13, 2007, 10:45 PM   #5
Erik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
Nice video: not too busy. Well done.

Cadence shooting is a common bad habit of intermediate shooters. It is picked up near the transition from novice to intermediate shooter in the mistaken belief that it will make them faster. That may be the case in the short term, but as your skill set and abilitites increases the use of a cadence serves, more often than not, as an impedement to progress as the intermediate shooter looks to transition to an advanced shooter.

(Shooter categories used are loose, generic ones.)

YMMV, but that has been my experience.

On competition: The better competitors allow the front sight to dicatate how fast htey shoot; they do so amazingly fast with great accuracy.

---

Fatigue is a factor, too; when it sets in many advanced shooters, who worked through it, lapse back into it.
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective
Erik is offline  
Old December 16, 2007, 05:46 PM   #6
vox rationis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
Very nice video..I have a question though, what do you think of "hammers" (two shots with one sight picture) for close range defensive shooting?
vox rationis is offline  
Old December 17, 2007, 08:06 PM   #7
Lurper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
I don't see any reason to use what some commonly call "controlled pairs" or "hammers" there is not advantage to two shots with one sight picture. I can't say it any better than this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wbg2s2bfjhw
Lurper is offline  
Old December 17, 2007, 09:17 PM   #8
Erik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
Son,
I don't think "giving up the front sight" is worth it when you consider how fast you can shoot with it.
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective
Erik is offline  
Old December 17, 2007, 10:05 PM   #9
vox rationis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
I've tried hammers and frankly I feel like the weapon is too out of control on the second shot for my liking, and I personally like to have a front sight picture for every shot, but I was wondering what some of you thought about the hammers. Recently they had one of those personal defense shows where they were at Gunsite I believe, and they were doing hammers, but at targets at very close range, it looked like around 3-5 yards or less even maybe. Anyway I wanted to get y'all's thoughts on the subject.

Lurper thanks for the other video link, actually I'd seen it already and that's how I try to shoot as well.
vox rationis is offline  
Old December 18, 2007, 08:13 PM   #10
kgpcr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 23, 2005
Posts: 946
If it works dont fix it. It does not make much sense to me but if you think it will help you then by all means do it
__________________
Colt King Cobra .357 Colt Anaconda .44mag
Springfield Armory .45 Double stack Loaded
XD40 service XD45 Taurus 617 .357mag
Smith M&P 40
kgpcr is offline  
Old December 19, 2007, 03:25 AM   #11
Axion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 619
This is kind of off target but. Where do you get those sort of metal targets you are shooting at in the video, and is it safe to shoot at them with FMJ bullets.

I want to start working on my transitions and taking a few targets like those out to the desert seems to be the ideal way since you get immediate feedback on weather or not you hit the target.
__________________
A couple of Sigs and a Walther
Axion is offline  
Old December 19, 2007, 05:05 PM   #12
Lurper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
Quote:
Son,
I don't think "giving up the front sight" is worth it when you consider how fast you can shoot with it.


Axion,
Those are just standard steel targets that we had made. Any metal shop should be able to make them for you. Yes, they are safe to shoot w/fmj, but you really don't want them any closer than about 10 yards (especially with jacketed ammo).

One thing to keep in mind, shooting steel can teach you bad habits. With steel, you can be less precise (read sloppy) because you only need to hit the target anywhere. When you shoot at other targets that require more precision, you may get less than ideal hits.
Lurper is offline  
Old December 19, 2007, 05:36 PM   #13
STLRN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 28, 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 1,163
Never say there is never a need for a technique, it all depends on proximity to the threat and the situation at hand.

If you are beyond muzzle to chest range, but still close enough that you can have effects, than there it is a valid technique. If you are beyond that distance and will just miss with your second round than no its not.
__________________
God truly fights on the side with the best artillery
STLRN is offline  
Old January 12, 2008, 07:26 AM   #14
Rifleman 173
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 588
Talk about a different kind of cadence shooting.

Shooting in cadence? Ever see the movie "Zulu?" The movie is about a real battle between the British Army and the warriors of the Zulu tribe of South Africa. The battle took place at Rorke's Drift. In the movie they show cadence fire being used to curb the Zulu attack. As I understand it, there was some sort of cadence fire actually used or tried at Rorke's Drift but it may NOT have been done like it was shown in the movie.

Get a load of this one: Cadence fire can be used with automatic fire weapons. I know you're going, "HUH????" In WW2, from about 1943 and on, USMC squads would try to have 3 BARs (Browning Automatic Rifles) in each squad to be used to fight the Japanese. The Marines developed a technique that they used in some situations, like against machinegun nests and bunkers, where one BAR would target the bunker. When the first BAR ran out of ammo then the second BAR would start shooting. While the second BAR was shooting BAR # 1 is reloading and BAR # 3 got ready to engage the target. By using this cadence shooting technique the BARs were able to keep constant fire on their intended target until a guy could use grenades or satchel charges to blow it up. Is cadence fire viable? It seems so in SOME applications. It probably would not work in all cases.
Rifleman 173 is offline  
Old January 13, 2008, 08:22 AM   #15
Tanzer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2007
Posts: 884
Not bragging here, but I'm one of those people who can pick up just about any tool and use it well. Show me once, I've got it & just need practice. There's one thing I cannot do no matter how hard I try; Read/play music. The difference between a three beat and a four beat makes absolutely no sense to me. Therefore, cadence never gets in my way. I can't remember ever worrying about rhythm in anyth........ Uh, well, there's one thing, but this isn't the site to talk about bumpin' uglies.

AAANYHEW.... I've been working on double taps & up to four shot series recently & have a question for Lurper or anyone skilled at this: I didn't want to start a new post because I didn't want "yahoo' answers.

I don't want to "fight the recoil", so I'm relaxing the elbows after the shot breaks (tough because I like just a touch of follow-through). The question is, should I be more concerned with the strong or the support hand when regaining the sight picture, or should I adjust in unicine? Secondly, should I worry so much about getting back to the push/pull I'd use in a single shot, or just grasp firmly? I know from previous training that a relaxed hand is faster than a tense one, so do I really need to get back to that balanced squeeze? It take more time.
I'm not looking for trophy shooting, just decent grouping & not letting one get away. I know it'll take practice, but I want to practice the right method. I think I'm a little too worried about getting the "push/pull" back to single-shot feel.
My main deal is SD shooting, so I'm not looking to empty my mag.
__________________
Only the ignorant find ignorance to be bliss. Only those of us who know better will suffer from it.
Tanzer is offline  
Old January 14, 2008, 04:37 PM   #16
Lurper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
You shouldn't fight the recoil, you should let it do the work for you.
Your elbows shouldn't relax "after" the shot, the should be relaxed all the time.
Likewise with the grip; your grip should be neutral. It should be loose but firm, not deathgripped. Adjusting your grip every shot is counterproductive as is "push-pull" or "isometric tension". Relax, achieve a natural and neutral grip/stance. This will allow you to shoot much faster.

This may help:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wbg2s2bfjhw
Lurper is offline  
Old January 14, 2008, 05:00 PM   #17
Tanzer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2007
Posts: 884
Thanks Lurper,
I may have over-emphasized the whole elbow tension deal. It's not like I lock them, but I don't let them "limp" either. Same with the grip. I look at it like "holding a chicken by the neck". Not choking it, but firm enough to keep it in place.
When it comes to push/pull, I do it slightly, not like a contest between the two hands. I've dropped it in the past with negative results, but what the heck, I'll try it again. That's what range practice is for. I instinctively want to tighten the strong hand to regain the sight picture. I'll work on that too. I just can't seem to get the recoil straight back. The barrel wants to raise. BTW - I'm shooting a .45 cal 1911 with a 3" barrel - my carry weapon.
I'll take what you mentioned into account at the range tomorrow & see if I can get that natural balance. I've viewed the video repeatedly and notice how you the gun just finds its way back to position. As with so many things, a lot is in the mind. If I could just find that balance that lets it right itself, I suppose it'd do it for me. Sometimes it's hard not to over-think.
Thanks again.
__________________
Only the ignorant find ignorance to be bliss. Only those of us who know better will suffer from it.
Tanzer is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10584 seconds with 9 queries