The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 23, 2006, 01:49 AM   #1
eegnayr@yahoo.com
Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Posts: 30
Chrome and Brass Winchester caseings

I picked up some chrome cartridges for winchester 9mm. Is there any differences between the chrome and brass cartridges for reloading. Anything i should be aware of, or is the only difference just the color ?
eegnayr@yahoo.com is offline  
Old May 23, 2006, 07:33 AM   #2
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 5,154
It isn't chromium it's nickel plated brass.Difference is mostly appearance though there are many myths about it !! One myth is that nickel wears out dies , NO it's dirt and sand that will wear out a die !
mete is offline  
Old May 23, 2006, 07:34 AM   #3
whitebb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 18, 2006
Location: ga
Posts: 313
I don't load 9mm, but .357 etc. The casings should load equally, but I find that nickle plated cases don't last as long as brass. Use them, and when the case mouth splits, recycle them. I pretty much have eliminated most in my reloading except for some left in my plinking lot. (My plinking lot is mixed case with fewer than 50, or excessively stained etc. Good to shoot, but not up to my standards for accuracy)
As for reasons why they don't last, there is a good post 10-20 lines down called nickle vs brass.
whitebb is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05720 seconds with 9 queries