The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 18, 2006, 01:39 AM   #1
bbcode3
Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 18
WTK: Info. on FA Uzi's

Guys,

I see posts to stay away from registered bolt Uzi's. Other than not being able to change calibers and the bolt being the "registered" part (ie. losing the entire gun if the bolt goes KABOOM); what is the advantage of the registered receiver.

I understand the RR is more desirable; I just want to know why???

What are price differences as well????

Also, is the bolt married to the host???? I have a Form 1 which has the serial # of the semi auto host on the ATF form (it's a slotted bolt gun).
bbcode3 is offline  
Old February 18, 2006, 09:34 AM   #2
MeekAndMild
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 2, 2001
Posts: 4,988
One big advantage of a RR gun is that they won't neccessarily put you in jail if you buy a parts kit which contains a spare bolt.

Another advantage is that registered receiver guns are 'original' in terms of collectability. A lot of people think 'Frankengun' when they hear of a registered bolt gun.

In terms of function, the Vector/Group RR guns are heat treated so they advertise them as difficult to wear out.

I don't know how you'd ever wear out a FA bolt as basically it is a block of steel, but I suppose that it could be done, especially the firing pin. So if the firing pin ever wears down on a RR gun the owner can just throw the bolt away and put in the one from their spare parts kit or they can send their bolt to the gunsmith for a new firing pin. How do you send a registered bolt to the gunsmith? Do you make an appointment to bring it in and hold it in your lap while he does firing pin surgery on it?
__________________
In a few years when the dust finally clears and people start counting their change there is a pretty good chance that President Obama may become known as The Great Absquatulator. You heard it first here on TFL.
MeekAndMild is offline  
Old February 18, 2006, 09:49 AM   #3
shaggy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2004
Posts: 1,519
Meek has covered it pretty well - the perception that a registered receiver gun is more correct is a big factor as well as the fact that it would be more difficult to repair a bolt than a receiver. There's usually about a $1000 price difference between registered bolt guns and registered receiver guns. Personally I'd stick with the receiver gun. I don't so much care about what is more like the original or what is factory correct as long as it shoots well. The problem with the bolt guns is that if somethng happens to the bolt, it can be difficult to get it repaired. You can form 5 the broken bolt to a gunsmith so they can temporarily possess it for repairs, but who do you send it to? Since the firing pin is machined into the bolt face, if it broke or wore down you'd probably have to reweld it and then carefully mill it back. Considering the space in which there is to work on a bolt face, I'd think thats some very tight (and difficult) work. The chances of breaking a bolt (registered or not) is probably very slim and I've never heard of it happening, but I would think its at least possible.
shaggy is offline  
Old February 18, 2006, 02:10 PM   #4
Samuel_Hoggson
Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 1999
Posts: 90
.02

I would add that you may have failed to appreciate the desirability of caliber conversion kits. The .22 kit is so much fun I bought a 2nd RR just to have a dedicated FA .22 Uzi. I can shoot all day for minimal money. No need for a suppressor - shoot right behind the house without disturbing the animals.

Sam
Samuel_Hoggson is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06489 seconds with 9 queries