The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 14, 2000, 08:40 AM   #1
Dave P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 1999
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,127
M1A/308: my Remington brass is well dinged up, used about 7-8 times on average. Yesterday, much of it was not ejecting (too tight). I have been neck-sizing and trimming every time. I have FL resized of couple of times.

Should I just FL resize and keep on using it? Or just toss it?

How might this brass be jamming more than it used to? (piston assy & hole seems OK)

Thanks for the info!

[This message has been edited by Dave P (edited October 14, 2000).]
Dave P is offline  
Old October 14, 2000, 08:51 AM   #2
Pampers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2000
Location: In the Lost State of Franklin
Posts: 482
I'm suprised that your M1A would accept neck sized only brass. I've never seen one that would, but. All High Power shooters that I know full length resize the minimum amount necessary to assure reliable functioning.

You can check the cases for insipid case head seperation by making a tool out of a paper clip. Extend all but the last loop and bend a 3/16" L (90 degrees) on the end. With the bent tip, "feel" the inside base of the case for a groove. If there is one, discard the case. If not, reuse it.

------------------
Fred J. Drumheller
NRA Life
NRA Golden Eagle
Pampers is offline  
Old October 14, 2000, 08:54 AM   #3
Contender
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 1998
Location: NY
Posts: 680
Dave, I usually use the 4th trimming as the time to junk it rule. That's with commercial brass. The web area of the case will start to become too thin and may seperate otherwise. Not really sure about military brass.
Contender is offline  
Old October 14, 2000, 08:58 AM   #4
PJR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2000
Posts: 1,127
There really is not a hard and fast rule that you can apply to all rounds. A benchrester might reload his 6mm PPC case dozens of times while someone shooting a hot load .30 might only get three or four reloads before the case started to show signs of head separation. You have to check your cases and when in doubt, throw it out.
PJR is offline  
Old October 14, 2000, 06:10 PM   #5
trlmech
Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 85
When in dought, throw it out. PJR are you Johnny Cochran in disguise? Brass is cheap,why take a chance.
trlmech is offline  
Old October 14, 2000, 06:51 PM   #6
Dave P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 1999
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,127
Pampers: my rifle normally does fine with the fireformed brass being neck sized only. The bolt has to force the cartridge in, but it ejects OK.

I felt for an inner groove - found none. Some I cut open a couple, and they look fine to me.

I will FL resize one more time, then trash them, I guess. Sometimes its painful to be so cheap!

Thanks for the help, guys!
Dave P is offline  
Old October 16, 2000, 03:54 PM   #7
Hutch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2000
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,124
Hmmmm....

Might be case neck thickening. You have a trimmer... Did you turn the necks after trimming? Might stretch your glide a little further, but heck, .308 brass is cheap.
Hutch is offline  
Old October 16, 2000, 04:32 PM   #8
swampyMO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 1999
Location: Missouri
Posts: 327
Dave P.,

Don't know if this directly addresses your question or not, but the following article has been posted around for some time. I don't know exactly where it came from. After reading it, I started using the RCBS X-dies on my 30-06 Garand brass. Now I'm a believer. The X-dies work as advertised. I now use it for my .308 brass (M1-A) as well.

swampyMO

*******
RCBS X-DIES: A TEST
By Larry M. Gibson
Surprisingly, there was little fanfare with the introduction of RCBS's X-Dies. All I saw were small blurbs in the trade magazines and mention of them in Rick Jamison's Shooting Times column. Advertised to reduce or eliminate case stretch the question is; do they? My real interest was: Will they reduce case stretch, i.e. increase case life, of 7.62 NATO (that's .308 WIN to you non-mil types) cases fired in M14/M1A's? The number of reloadings per case for M14/M1A's is probably the worst of any rifle/cartridge combination short of the .303 Lee Enfield family. Incipient head separation is the reason for case loss. My experience with rack grade M14/M1A's is five good firings per case with the sixth being a "throwaway". This only if the brass was fired in a bolt gun or M14/M1A to begin with. A match M14/M1A with a tight "match" chamber may get 1-2 more firings but more often not. If surplus once fired brass is used the first firing was more than likely done in a machine gun and only 1-2 reloadings/firings are possible before head separation.
Most head separations can be identified as a speckled crack forming around the case just ahead of the web at the expansion ring. This crack is sometimes quite obvious. Then on some cases the head will separate from the case on ejection. Many times both parts of the separated case are ejected. But sometimes only the head is ejected leaving the front half of the case in the chamber. The rifle picks up the next round attempting to chamber it and things get jammed up. Not good! The other question here; is there gas cutting damage to the chamber? What causes this incipient head separation to happen? Simply put, on firing, the case expands to grip the chamber walls sealing off the gas pressure. When the bullet leaves the barrel pressures are reduced and the case contracts (not to its original dimensions) releasing it's grip on the chamber walls and allowing extraction. However, it appears that the M14/M1A begins extraction prior to the pressure dropping completely. The cases do not contract as much as they would if fired in a bolt action for instance. Compounding the problem is the mil-specs for military chambers are somewhat generous in their diameter dimension to allow for functional reliability during combat conditions. When full-length resizing (necessary for M14/M1A) case walls are squeezed in first. This pushes the shoulder forward. The shoulder is then set back by the FL die and the brass flows forward into and elongating the neck. This increases the case length on each resizing considerably. Also, since the brass at the expansion ring expanded and was squeezed in and forward during resizing the case gets progressively thinner in that specific area. The result is, eventually, a head separation at that thinning location. Most mil-spec (US) chambers allow for a maximum case length of about 2.045". I, like most M14/M1A users, have found trimming unnecessary. Incipient case head separation will occur, and cases discarded, before maximum case length is reached and trimming is necessary.
Are these RCBS X-Dies a cure for this? I decided to use my rack grade M1A to put them to the test. The issue GI barrel has quite a generous mil-spec chamber with headspace being within tolerance. This usually results in the fifth firing being the "throwaway" for brass in this rifle. It has untold thousands of rounds through it, many rapid fire. Accuracy capability is 2 1/2-3 MOA with M118 Special Ball or equivalent reload. This would be the best "worst case" test rifle. All rounds would be fired with the rifle loading from the magazine in normal semi-auto function. Slow fire single loading technique would not be used. For ammunition I selected 10 rounds of LC 92 M118 Special Ball. A check for concentricity revealed a runout of .011" for one round with the others being .004-.007".
My M118 equivalent load is:
BRASS: The 10 LC 92 cases from the selected M118 Special Ball
PRIMER: Winchester WLR
POWDWER: H4895 - 41gr
BULLET: M118 174gr
CARTRIDGE OAL: 2.8"
Other than deburring the flash hole, chamfering the case mouth and removing the primer pocket crimp, there was no special "case preparation" done. Cases were measured after each resizing with the minimum to maximum case lengths recorded. Concentricity was checked after each loading. Two cases (marked and tracked) consistently had .004-.005" runout with all others being .0005-.003" throughout the test. Neck thickness (outside diameter) was measured after each loading to check for brass flow into the neck area.
The test would be concluded based on any one of these criteria:
Any sign of incipient head separation.
Case buckled or dimensionally damaged/deformed during resizing.
Split neck or body.
Case length exceeding 2.045".
Loose primer pockets.
Neck thickening to cause excessive runout (.010").
Drastic deterioration of accuracy. (6th, 12th and 18th groups will
be fired in Fulton Armory Match M1A to verify accuracy)
Malfunctions caused by damaged (dinged up) cases.

All test firing was conducted at Tacoma Rifle and Revolver range. The range has solid cement benches, which were used with sandbag rests front and rear. A 100 yard reduced "A" bull target was used. All targets were at 100 yards. I set up the Oehler 35P to chronograph all rounds fired for each 10 shot string. But as the test went on, and on, and on I quit after the 10th string. Chronograph results were consistent and showed no variation other than that normally expected. The LC 92 M118 averaged 2600 FPS and the M118 equivalent reload averaged 2575 FPS for the subsequent 9 ten shot strings chronographed.
The RCBS X-Die was installed in my Pacific single stage press and adjusted as per the instructions. It's really quite easy. These dies differ from other FL dies in the dimension and design of the decapping rod. The diameter of the rod is larger and appears to act as a mandrill of sorts. There is a shoulder on it, which controls the length as the case. Apparently the case is prevented from stretching by the case mouth butting against this shoulder. Thus the decapping rod must be carefully adjusted as per the instructions. This shoulder is the key to the success of the die.
I found on the second resizing that the expander was really getting hard to pull through the necks. Also, the lengths of the cases were varying more than I thought they should. Case lubing technique was changed to standing the cases in a tray. They were then sprayed lightly with Dillon case lube. With this method the necks (lube gets sprayed lightly into the case mouth) pulled over the expander quite easily and the uniformity of case length dramatically improved. Cases are cleaned again to remove the lube. This should also remove the lube from the inside of the case neck.
Throughout the test case length never exceeded 2.027" and actually remained quite consistent. After the 12th resizing the necks had begun to thicken by about .001" at the shoulder to taper forward about 1/3 of the way to the case mouth. However, this did not adversely effect concentricity or accuracy. The case rims got a little beat up but there were no malfunctions of any kind. This included the 2 firings in the match chamber M1A. Primer pockets remained tight throughout the test. I thought the case mouths would require rechamfering but they did not. Accuracy remained consistent with the rack grade M1A. The LC 92 M118 ten shot group was 2.8". The last (15th) ten shot group with the M118 equivalent load was 2.4". The average of groups 2-15 being 2.7". Groups 6 and 12 were fired with the match M1A to verify the accuracy and both were 1.6".
The test was concluded after the 15th firing based on incipient head separation. One case developed that slight speckled circle at the expansion ring. There was no clear-cut crack and probably no gas cutting happened. I may or may not continue the test with the rest of the cases.
Tabulated below are the measurements after each resizing:
RESIZING MINIMUM MAXIMUM INCREASE
CASE CASE IN CASE
LENGTH LENGTH LENGTH
1 2.013 2.019
2 2.021 2.025 .006
3 2.025 2.027 .002
4 2.025 2.027 .000
5 2.022 2.027 .000
6 2.023 2.025 -.002
7 2.023 2.025 .000
8 2.024 2.026 .001
9 2.024 2.027 .001
10 2.025 2.027 .000
11 2.025 2.027 .000
12 2.024 2.026 -.001
13 2.025 2.026 .000
14 2.024 2.027 .001

Case length evened out at the third resizing and remained fairly consistent. Interestingly #'s 6 & 12 that were fired in the match M1A show a decrease in length! At #12 is where I detected a thickening (.001") of the case necks in the shoulder area which tapered forward. Again this did not effect concentricity or accuracy.

Questions not addressed in this test:
1. Case life when used in match chambers or bolt guns?
2. Case life of cases already fired several times?
3. Case life of surplus once-fired (in machine guns) cases?
4. Case life of civilian manufactured (Rem,Win,Fed,PMC,et all) cases?
The answers to these questions will probably have results as positive, if not more so, than this test.

My technique for loading M14/M1A ammo now will probably be as follows:
1. Clean cases
2. Stand cases in loading trays and spray lightly with Dillon case lube.
3. Size with RCBS X-Die using Pacific single stage press.
4. Clean cases. Clean primer pockets. (On 1st resizing prep cases by: remove primer crimp, deburr flash hole, turn necks, trim to uniform length and chamfer case mouth). Conduct visual inspection for defects (split necks, head separation, etc.).
5. Load on Dillon 550B. Use a Bonanza neck size die or a Redding bushing die at station 1.
This may or may not be necessary. The idea here is to iron out any dents the second cleaning may have caused in the case mouth and maybe uniform neck tension on the bullet.
This limited test revealed that; using the RCBS X-Dies, when reloading for the M14/M1A, one may expect 3 times or more firings per case as when using standard dies. I have been using Bonanza Benchrest FL Dies prior to this. I've never found the need for small base dies, as some recommend, for they really shorten case life. This increase of case life is, in my opinion, truly astounding. Also, it appears case trimming is unnecessary. I would hope RCBS would make them in a wider array of caliber's than currently available. I will buy more of them. When I think of the thousands of 5-6 times fired brass I have thrown out … Oh well!
swampyMO is offline  
Old October 17, 2000, 11:31 PM   #9
Johnny Guest
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 28, 1999
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,116
SwampyMO

I enjoyed reading the Larry Gibson article you posted. It was most informative. Where was it published? I had missed it previously, and found it very interesting.

------------------
---The Second Amendment ensures the rest of the Bill of Rights---
Johnny Guest is offline  
Old October 20, 2000, 04:26 PM   #10
Bogie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 5, 2000
Location: Job hunting on the road...
Posts: 3,827
Er... I hate to tell you - benchresters shoot fairly hot loads - A 68 gr. 6mm bullet moving out at 3400 fps ain't bad... I had a period at this year's nationals when I was blowing primers. The thing about PPC brass is that it takes to "bumping" fairly well, and doesn't generally show a tendency to separate. You'll wear out the neck or the primer pocket will get too loose first.

In this case, I'd set a FL die to minimally bump the brass, and stick with that.

Bogie is offline  
Old October 22, 2000, 08:38 AM   #11
swampyMO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 1999
Location: Missouri
Posts: 327
Johnny Guest,

Sorry, but I have no idea where this article originally came from. I pulled it off of a BBS post a few months back.

Like I said, I'm a believer in the X-dies.... They seem to work just as advertised, i.e. eliminating the need to frequently trim brass and to extend the useful life of same.

Swampy
swampyMO is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08362 seconds with 9 queries