The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 21, 2000, 08:12 PM   #1
Steve Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 9, 1999
Posts: 4,131
Earlier today, I went to the range with my trusty chronograph to test my loads for IDPA compliancy (165,000 PF=bullet weightxfps). That means that my 200gr.'ers have to go 825fps to comply. I had 200gr. LSWCs over 5.7gr. of W231, Speer cases and Win Large Pistol primers. The load was consistently 10 fps over the PF, so I ran back home and built up some loads using 5.7gr. as the bottom level. I loaded 5 of each: 5.7gr, 5.9gr., 6.1gr., and 6.2gr., having previously tested 6.3gr., found that even though the recoil wasn't too still, it was more than necessary, and accuracy was not great. Anyway, I ran back to the range (10 minutes from home) and shot the loads. The best accuracy was 2.5" at 10 yds. I expected better. Any ideas? If you guys are thinking, "continue to work from 6.3 on up to max" I'd understand, but will 2.5" acuracy be good enough for IDPA? I'm not thinking it will.

------------------
Frontsight!
=========================
"Put a rifle in the hands of a Subject, and he immediately becomes a Citizen." -- Jeff Cooper
Steve Smith is offline  
Old May 21, 2000, 09:11 PM   #2
Steve Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 9, 1999
Posts: 4,131
Moderator, sorry for the double tap...please lock this one and leave the other open.
Steve Smith is offline  
Old May 22, 2000, 11:30 PM   #3
alan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Posts: 3,745
You might try the following, working up from below. 5.2 grains of Red Dot. You are shooting a 45 ACP, I assume.

Perhaps the accuracy problem, such as it is, might be with the pistol or the shooter. In any event, last time I looked, 2.5" was good enough for either IDPA ot IPSC
alan is offline  
Old May 23, 2000, 08:59 AM   #4
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,526
I go with Alan. For years, I've used 5.8 grains of 251 with a 200-grain LSWC, and had excellent groups. In very slow fire, I could put hits edge-to-edge around a nickel-sized circle at five yards. (Well, I almost always missed getting perfection, of removing the "nickel" in seven shots. Great practice in trigger control, though.)

If your bushing fit is good, and your link-length is good, you oughta check yourself on sight picture...

Good luck, Art
Art Eatman is offline  
Old May 24, 2000, 08:27 AM   #5
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,237
If you're not satisfied with your W231 load (IMI case, CCI300, 5.9g W231, OAL 1.258", finish w/Lee Carbide Factory Crimp die) try AA#5, Power Pistol, Bullseye, or Universal Clays.

------------------
"All my ammo is factory ammo"

WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old May 24, 2000, 08:49 AM   #6
Matt VDW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 27, 1999
Posts: 1,315
Frontsight,

Have you checked your bore to see if it's leading? Anything over six grains of W231 is a fairly hot load for a .45 ACP.
Matt VDW is offline  
Old May 24, 2000, 09:19 AM   #7
Steve Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 9, 1999
Posts: 4,131
Thanks for the advise, guys. Unfortunately, I bought a lot more W231 than I can just ignore and buy something else. I'm going back to the range today with more ammo and time than I had last time, and will report back tomorrow with the results.
Steve Smith is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06975 seconds with 9 queries