The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 30, 2005, 09:33 PM   #1
kirbymagnum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 410
17 hmr

People say the 17 hmr can make crows go up in feathers and make rabbits at 100 yrds look like they have been hit with a grenade. I find this hard to believe after watching dog be gone when the pdogs were shot with the 17 hmr they jumped a little. But i really only read this on RFC lots of the other forums say they were disappointed by the effect it had on animals. Some of the people claim to shoot and hit thumbtacks at 100 yrds and have a 86% hit rate and at 150 yrds a 60% hit rate and 200 a 12.5% hit rate. If there was even a 5 mph wind the 17 hmr would get pushed 2 inches at 100 yrds and I'm sure that would effect how you could hit those tiny tacks. So is the 17 hmr really what people say it is?

Sorry if a offend anyone i don't mean to.
kirbymagnum is offline  
Old December 31, 2005, 09:32 PM   #2
stevelyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Fairbanksan in exile to Aleutian Hell
Posts: 2,618
Yup, pretty close. One of the guys I work with has a Marlin in .17 HMR with a BSA Sweet 17 scope on it. On our days off we go out hunting tundra squirrells(sp?) in the summer. It litterally turns the little rats inside out.
He created a sewing job on a mink pelt rather than letting me shoot it with a
.22 short. Then about 2 weeks ago we were out fox hunting and he killed a fox at about 100 yrds with one shot with only early morning twilight and a spotlight to light up his eyes. The fox started to run after being hit and just fell over.
The original 17 grain CCI TNTs are a little more destructive than the 20 grain Gamepoints, but they're still devastating and tend to leave big holes in good fur at close range.
__________________
Herman Cain '12

Squished bugs on a windshield is proof the slow/heavy bullet theory works.
stevelyn is offline  
Old December 31, 2005, 10:25 PM   #3
HOKIEHUNTER
Member
 
Join Date: May 9, 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 74
haha somebody's a member of RFC!!! i shot squirrels today with my hmr. i shot 2 in the heads which were no longer attached when i got there, shot one in the gut point blank and didn't have to clean him, shot one in the back facing away and it cut off both legs, and the last one i just grazed the back of and he made it into a dead tree.

birds disappear.

are you annoyed with brad at rfc? the "tack post" is ridiculous. it is VERY plausible that you could knock 4 tacks out with 6 hmr shots. VERY PLAUSIBLE!!! brad likes to heae himself talk and the only words he knows are suhl, usrb, and impossbile.

the 86% on the tacks may be hard to believe, but not knowing anything about the guy's setup / conditions / skill i can't make a final judgement.

moral of the story is that a stock hmr will beat a stock .22 in accuracy just about every day of the week. it's a devasting little round and as match barrels and ammo come out it'll put those match .22's to shame. brad may diasagree with me and may build himself up while doing so, but hey, to each his own. all i know is mine is incredibly accurate and shooting it is addictive as all get out.
__________________
"Out here due justice is a bullet."
John Wayne - "The Green Berets"
HOKIEHUNTER is offline  
Old January 1, 2006, 11:03 AM   #4
Long Path
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,888
Uh, what's RFC?
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page
Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________ Better and Better, the blog. _____
Long Path is offline  
Old January 1, 2006, 11:31 AM   #5
9mm1033
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2005
Location: A big city with far too many cars and people.
Posts: 932
I bought a Marlin 17VS for varmints. I experienced very-very good accuracy (scoped) for my 100 yard sight-in distance. On squirrels it worked fine. But, on fox and chunkie groundhogs, not that great on body shots. Oh, they died, but not after rolling and kicking a bit. On windy days, it stayed in the gun locker. I stepped up to a .243 when shooting into a crosswind. I traded it away. Not too disappointed either.
__________________
No one reads or cares what is written in ones signature box. So I'm not writing anything worth reading or remembering.
9mm1033 is offline  
Old January 1, 2006, 11:33 AM   #6
ffxmike
Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Posts: 95
RFC = www.rimfirecentral.com

Message board dedicated to rimfire.
ffxmike is offline  
Old January 1, 2006, 08:22 PM   #7
tinman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2005
Location: OHIO
Posts: 118
I've tried the 17hmr on groundhogs. The hog was thirty yards, quartering towards. The shot entered just behind the jawbone and into the chestcavity. Since it was a hog, no dressing was required and couldn't say what happened inside, only that the bullet never exited. IMO, the 17 is fine for small varmint, it shoots fairly flat, but is bucked by the wind. I'll keep mine, and use it accordingly. When the wind is up, guess the 30/06 fills the gap. Definately know when you hit a hog with it.
tinman is offline  
Old January 1, 2006, 09:02 PM   #8
kirbymagnum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 410
First time shooting the 17 hmr today I was impressed can that thing shoot. At 150 yrds shooting pop cans with filled with water never think about doing that with my 22lr. The 17hmr is really accurate flat and is a tack driver but i still don't think a 86% hit rate is that realistic unless you have a big scope to see the tacks and a calm day. Ya that thread was annoying.
kirbymagnum is offline  
Old January 3, 2006, 08:20 PM   #9
kirbymagnum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 410
Do you think it is enough for beaver at 20-50 yrds my .22lr killed it after some flopping. Would the bullet selection be necessary or would the v-max do just fine?
kirbymagnum is offline  
Old January 4, 2006, 04:27 PM   #10
tinman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2005
Location: OHIO
Posts: 118
There sure isn't much selection out there for the 17. The v-max will be fine, but shot placement is crucial. I've put a 3x9 on mine, and it's ok. I would't mind a bigger objective though, as it's hard to pick them out in the shadows sometimes.
__________________
Tom

If you can't shoot quality, try quantity.
tinman is offline  
Old January 4, 2006, 04:29 PM   #11
kirbymagnum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 410
Thanks for the info guys.

tinman,
Where would a well placed shot be on a beaver ( Head) anywhere els?
kirbymagnum is offline  
Old January 4, 2006, 09:59 PM   #12
duck911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2005
Posts: 256
I LOVE my .17 HMR. I think it's the perfect gun for anything prairie dog sized out to 175 yards, and anything chuck sized and under, below 100 yards.

Just remember the bullet is LIGHT and although it has great terminal performance on the right target at the right ranges, IMHO it's too light for heavier varmints past 100 and especially in the wind.

My experience is as follows: I'd estimate that can keep 80% of my shots on a coke can at 175 yards and 100% of my shots on a cola can at 100 yards. My scope is a cheap bushnell and I only consider myself a very average shot.

Shots out to 200 are doable but you gotta hold WAY over!

If I'm hunting p-dogs or squirrels or plinking out to 175 I love my .17. But if the game is chucks or anything bigger than that and past 100 yards, I reach for my .204!
__________________
--Duck911
duck911 is offline  
Old January 4, 2006, 10:11 PM   #13
kirbymagnum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 410
What does IMHO mean?
kirbymagnum is offline  
Old January 4, 2006, 10:15 PM   #14
duck911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2005
Posts: 256
In my humble opinion
__________________
--Duck911
duck911 is offline  
Old January 5, 2006, 01:55 PM   #15
kingudaroad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2005
Location: austin
Posts: 735
A lot of folks complain about the cost of 17hmr ammo compared to .22. In my opinion its apples and oranges. The 17hmr is a better round in every aspect and in this case you get what you pay for.
kingudaroad is offline  
Old January 5, 2006, 02:11 PM   #16
Fish Head
Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2005
Location: Centralia, Missouri
Posts: 27
kIMBER CONVERSION

Kimber makes a 17 conversion for their 1911s. Does anyone have any experience with them? I have seen them listed for ~$350. I have the 22 conversion and just wondered how the 17 would function in the 1911????

FH
Fish Head is offline  
Old January 5, 2006, 06:08 PM   #17
bodab
Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 82
you caught me..i'm also a memeber of RFC and the .17 is one BAD round! it'll kill rabbits well past 100yrds! I use mine mainly for killing targets but every now and then i'll get it after varmints and it does what its made for...
bodab is offline  
Old January 5, 2006, 07:15 PM   #18
OneInTheChamber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2005
Posts: 789
HEY DUCK; get a BSA sweet 17. They have a bullet drop compensator. No more guess work. Dial in the yardage, it moves the crosshairs appropriately. I love mine.



Chase
__________________
Insert witty, comical, and/or significant quote here.
OneInTheChamber is offline  
Old January 5, 2006, 09:33 PM   #19
duck911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2005
Posts: 256
Not a big BSA fan but the general concept sounds good to me. Can anyone tell me more about the sweet 17 and hoiw well it hols up? Are the clicks repeatable?

--Duck911
__________________
--Duck911
duck911 is offline  
Old January 6, 2006, 08:28 AM   #20
Long Path
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,888
Quote:
you caught me..i'm also a memeber of RFC and the .17 is one BAD round! it'll kill rabbits well past 100yrds! I use mine mainly for killing targets but every now and then i'll get it after varmints and it does what its made for...
That's it?

In May, I watched Rich and new friend Ashley drop rabbits with such regularity at 100 to 140 yards with Ashley's Kimber .22 LR, that I had to borrow it and try it myself. With Winchester .22 LR ammo and an accurate rifle, one-shot 100 yard+ kills on jackrabbits were pretty common over that weekend, with cottontails being no big deal. I frankly had to extend what I considered the useful range of a .22 LR. You mean the .17 HMR only equals that? Honestly, I've never played with them. It looks like they're extremely flat, but the energy drops off very fast, and with such a light little bullet, you've got little but energy (i.e.: velocity) to go on.

At $11 or $12 a box for 500 round bricks of higher quality ammo, the amount of joyful shooting with .22 LR cannot be underrated. For my purposes, the issue is apples to apples-- how much shooting can I do?
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page
Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________ Better and Better, the blog. _____
Long Path is offline  
Old January 6, 2006, 07:00 PM   #21
bodab
Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 82
i would go to the RFC site and look around if i were you but everyone over there said that the BSA sweet 17 wasnt a real good scope so i have been holding off buying one. also go to varmintal.com and he has all the info on the .17 your could every need, even chats that compare the .22lr and .22 mag with the .17
bodab is offline  
Old January 6, 2006, 08:25 PM   #22
shureshot0471
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2005
Location: In the sticks of East Texas
Posts: 185
I will say this that the .17 hmr is that fast and It will put crows up in feathers next time we do it I will make viedo of it and put it on here
__________________
"Prefection is not attainable,but if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
-Vince Lombardi
"Gun control is putting that second bullet through the same hole the first one made."
- Ted Nugent
shureshot0471 is offline  
Old January 6, 2006, 09:58 PM   #23
duck911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2005
Posts: 256
Past 100 yards the results won't be "explosive" (the FUN part about owning a ,17!) but the .22's results are not real explosive at ANY range.

But I think it's reasonable to expect 1 shot kills on rabbit sized game (and under) in the 150-175 yard range with a 17. At least, that's been my experience. And whereas with my .22 have to hold *inches* high, at 150 yards I hold dead on with my .17. I am consistantly shocked and amazed at the accuracy of my .17. There is overlap between the .17 and the .22, but in my opinion it's like the overlap between a .243 and 30-06. Each have their place, each can do some of what the other can, but there a right time for each, too.
__________________
--Duck911
duck911 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11251 seconds with 9 queries