The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 17, 2000, 02:01 PM   #1
Bill in NM
Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2000
Posts: 95
I reload for a number of different calibers, most of which use a taper crimp. I do understand the difference between a roll and taper crimp. My question is, as the title asks, HOW does a die roll crimp? The diameter of the bullet is larger than the cannelure depth. It would seem that it could not push the case mouth into the cannelure with out shaving off the upper portion of the bullet. What am I missing?
Thanks!
Bill
Bill in NM is offline  
Old March 17, 2000, 06:39 PM   #2
Trigger Jerk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 1999
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 136
The cannealure, of course is of slightly less diameter than the bullet, thus allowing room for the mouth to crimp in to.

The difference between the taper crimp die and the roll crimp die: The opening at the base of the taper crimp die, starts out large (relatively speaking) and gradually narrows, simply forcing the case to squeeze the bullet.

The roll crimp die "narrows" in just a few thousands of an inch, forcing the mouth to "roll" inth the bullet. If adjusted down too far, the case will buckle.

I hope that one, my explantion makes sense, and two, that it answers your question. It sure would be a lot easier to draw you a picture.
Trigger Jerk is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06012 seconds with 9 queries