The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Competition Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 7, 2005, 06:42 AM   #1
Old Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2005
Location: Greenville/Anderson area of SC
Posts: 280
S&W model 686 or 66?

Need opinions. I've never really been a revolver shooter but every once in a while I get the urge. I've narrowed it down to a 4" barrel 6 shot 357mag (for the option of .38 special).

Now the choice is between the 686 or the 66. Whatcha think (- and yeah, I know I can't go wrong with either but which one)? The purpose is to shoot in IDPA in SSR.
__________________
My life is based on a true story ....
Sometimes I wish I could sit back and watch the things I do.
Old Shooter is offline  
Old September 7, 2005, 06:55 AM   #2
XavierBreath
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2002
Location: North Louisiana
Posts: 2,800
I think the overwhelming choice here is going to be the heavier 686.
I prefer the unlugged M66 though.
__________________
Xavier's Blog
XavierBreath is offline  
Old September 7, 2005, 08:19 AM   #3
DT Guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2001
Posts: 725
Having had and shot both, I'll say it's a 'vanilla or chocolate' question. Some prefer the muzzle-heavy feel of the 686, some prefer the rearward balance of the 66. Accuracy and trigger will be essentially a wash between them.


AFA durability, not many people have actually worn out a 66, though many have read about it on the internet. Shooting the PF required for IDPA, a 66 will last several lifetimes.


Pick your favorite flavor after handling both and it's true; 'you can't go wrong' with either.

Larry
__________________
He who fights and runs away had better run pretty damn fast.

Government, Anarchy and Chaos
DT Guy is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 08:17 PM   #4
ted murphy
Member
 
Join Date: February 10, 2005
Posts: 32
I prefer the 66 myself, but the heavier weight of the 686 is liked by many.

If you want to buy new, you will be looking at the 686 as they discontinued the 66 last year.

Ted
ted murphy is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 08:26 PM   #5
DennisE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 3, 1999
Location: Treasure Coast, Florida
Posts: 484
I carry a 66 or a 386 on the theory that in IDPA you should shoot what you carry I'd opt for the 66. Dennis
DennisE is offline  
Old September 20, 2005, 12:44 AM   #6
JBA
Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2004
Location: East TN
Posts: 51
Man I love shooting the 66s. It's just one great ballenced wheelgun and heavy enough for hot 38s. But you'll have to use the HK twist type speedloaders cause the push type safariland speedloaders don't work well with the 66.
So the heavyier front end will give the 686 faster follow up shots and the push type safariland speedloaders should give you faster follow up shots.
So for gameing the 686 is hard to beat, but the 66 is my favorite just for fun shooter.
JBA is offline  
Old September 20, 2005, 06:12 AM   #7
DT Guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2001
Posts: 725
Quote:
But you'll have to use the HK twist type speedloaders cause the push type safariland speedloaders don't work well with the 66.

Unless you have the wrong model Comp I, II or III speedloaders or grips that interfere with the loader, this shouldn't be the case. My 19 worked perfectly well with Comp IIIs, although they are a different size than the ones needed for my 686.


Larry
__________________
He who fights and runs away had better run pretty damn fast.

Government, Anarchy and Chaos
DT Guy is offline  
Old September 24, 2005, 02:16 PM   #8
Lucky 7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2002
Posts: 454
686!
Suprised more fans havent sound off! It seems to have a better overall balance than the 66 (which all the weight seems to be towards the rear).
Hey anyone out there know of a dropleg or speed holster for the 686? Thx
Semper Fi!
-L7
__________________
Signature Space For Rent.
SOLD!
"Just relax. Breath normally. All you should see is the front sight post. Ignore the the target. Wait for the pause between breaths and when you feel good about it...ease the trigger back."
-PMI Sgt. Hopkins, USMC
Lucky 7 is offline  
Old September 24, 2005, 09:52 PM   #9
Guy B. Meredith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 1999
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 1,578
Since we're talking competition, I would say the 686 in 7-shot. The top choice for revolver competiton (ICORE) are the 8-shot 627 with the 645 and the 7-shot 686+ filling out most of the rest of the field.
__________________
Smart Gun + 1 Battery + 3 Wires = Dumb Gun

PC = Agenda driven groupthink filter on reality.

Apostrophes denote ownership or missing letters NOT plurals!
Guy B. Meredith is offline  
Old September 25, 2005, 01:36 PM   #10
Old Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2005
Location: Greenville/Anderson area of SC
Posts: 280
IDPA restricts wheel guns to 4" barrels and I believe the 686 with 7 shots only comes in 6" ... oh well!
__________________
My life is based on a true story ....
Sometimes I wish I could sit back and watch the things I do.
Old Shooter is offline  
Old September 25, 2005, 01:41 PM   #11
Ozzieman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 5,031
If your going to shoot 38' in IDPA in SSR

Then pick a 38 not a 357.
The 38 will be more accurate shooting 38's than a 357 for the chamber length the bullet has to jump befor hitting the lands.
Ozzieman is offline  
Old September 25, 2005, 02:13 PM   #12
Guy B. Meredith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 1999
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 1,578
Actually, I haven't seen much difference in accuracy between .38s and .357s for anything other than serious marksmanship shooting and I haven't tried that so I cannot verify there is a difference in that case. For IDPA, IPSC and other action competition the difference in accuracy is not enough to be of consequence.
__________________
Smart Gun + 1 Battery + 3 Wires = Dumb Gun

PC = Agenda driven groupthink filter on reality.

Apostrophes denote ownership or missing letters NOT plurals!
Guy B. Meredith is offline  
Old October 2, 2005, 12:20 AM   #13
JBA
Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2004
Location: East TN
Posts: 51
DT, the Model 66 cylinder does not swing out far enough for the comp 11 speedloaders to be used except very slowly. And mine are the correct ones for the model 66. And this was with the stock wood grips nearly worked down to nothing on the left side. The comp 111s with their long handle might work OK. And the HKS twist type work preaty good.
But the 686 lets the cylender swing out farther so the comp 11 speedloaders work very fast, and the model 66 comp 11 speedloaders work great with the 686 too. But the 686 comp 11 speedloaders don't work on the model 66.
The 38/357 accuracy difference I doubt could be a factor in anything but bullseye shooting. Especially if you got a good handload for the 38s you shoot.
JBA is offline  
Old October 2, 2005, 01:03 AM   #14
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,559
Price and which one feels better in your hand. A 66 is a SS M19. The 686 has a full lug and is heavier. You'll need to do a trigger job on either anyway, so the one that feels better is the one to go with.
"...for the comp 11 speedloaders..." No offense, but HKS speed loaders work just fine with a 66/19. The brand is irrelevant.
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old October 3, 2005, 04:22 PM   #15
ted murphy
Member
 
Join Date: February 10, 2005
Posts: 32
.38 or .357

The only advantage of buying a .38 gun is the cylinders can be easier to clean. I know shooting lead in my model 15 is much easier to clean up than on my 66 .357 magnum where you get the lead deposits on the longer chambers.

Small thing really, but noteworthy.

Ted
ted murphy is offline  
Old October 3, 2005, 06:20 PM   #16
DT Guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2001
Posts: 725
JBA,

I don't doubt you, but I've used Comp IIIs in a 19 many, many times without an issue. (Although I probably ALWAYS had Hogues on it when doing so.)

I've only got a 686 now, but I'll see if my dad's 19 has this issue and report back.



Larry
__________________
He who fights and runs away had better run pretty damn fast.

Government, Anarchy and Chaos
DT Guy is offline  
Old October 4, 2005, 07:36 AM   #17
Old Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2005
Location: Greenville/Anderson area of SC
Posts: 280
Good advise from all.

I ended up doing it the easy way - I bought both used. I'll try both for a while (cheapest speed loaders until I'm sure which one I'll keep) and just sell the one I won't be using. (I don't like safe queens so if I don't shoot it - out it goes).

Thanks everyone - it seems more like personal preference as to which one works the best. It may work out that I forget about shooting wheel guns and just stick with semi-autos!
__________________
My life is based on a true story ....
Sometimes I wish I could sit back and watch the things I do.
Old Shooter is offline  
Old October 4, 2005, 09:40 AM   #18
DT Guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2001
Posts: 725
Hah-my bet is you'll shoot (and keep) them both! Good revolvers are addictive, even for us 'square gun' fans.


Larry
__________________
He who fights and runs away had better run pretty damn fast.

Government, Anarchy and Chaos
DT Guy is offline  
Old October 6, 2005, 11:45 PM   #19
JBA
Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2004
Location: East TN
Posts: 51
DT I would say the comp 111s with their long shaft will work well with the 66models. The Comp11s that I said don't work well is the short speedloader. And the shortness is what makes them hard to work in the closeness of the model 66s.
So Ol Shooter, get the comp 111 speedloaders or the HKS type speedloaders for best workings with the 66 model.
JBA is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10019 seconds with 9 queries