The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 15, 2000, 05:29 PM   #1
Erik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
What are your favorite scopes for hunting and why? Fixed or variable? Which recticles do you prefer? Why?

Thanks,

Erik
Erik is offline  
Old March 15, 2000, 09:27 PM   #2
fed168
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2000
Posts: 1,040
Well, for hunting I have 2.75x Leupold on my Scout rifle and a 4x Leupold on my Model 70. Both are easy to maintain and still provide a good view for the woods. Also, I have not found an extended eye relief scope for a scout rifle, and the 4x came with the rifle. Rifle magazine, the last issue, had an article on hunting scopes. A 4x will do nicely out to 400 yards or so, if I read the article correctly. My favorite choice is a varible power, several advantages are better light gathering and a wider field of view at the lower powers. Fixed, if you are shooting at a set distance, is fine. Good care will add life to the scope. Most of all, it is what you are comfortable with. A Mk.IV would be nice, but a 4.5x14 works just as well.
fed168 is offline  
Old March 15, 2000, 09:30 PM   #3
fed168
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2000
Posts: 1,040
Sorry, forget to reply to the reticle question. I prefer the mil dot, as it is easier to estimate range and leads (most of my rifle training is sniping), but the duplex reticle is great also. The Vari X-III has a range finding capability in the reticle using the wide and narrow posts. But like I mentioned, it is what you are comfortable with.
fed168 is offline  
Old March 15, 2000, 11:40 PM   #4
USMCGrunt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2000
Location: Somewhere in 13T EG
Posts: 628
Havingin the past used cheap scopes, and paid for it later on, the only scopes I use today are Leupold. I have a Vari-X III M1LR on my Remington 700VS and another Vari-X III M3LR on my M-14. Both have the mil dot reticles and are my long range hunting rifles. Never seen the point for a scope if you are hunting at ranges under 300 yards. Just slows you down IMHO.
USMCGrunt is offline  
Old March 16, 2000, 10:12 AM   #5
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,584
I've never had a problem with a Weaver K-4, Leupold Vari-X II or Simmons 44 Mag. My first scope was a Weaver K2.5, in 1950.

A longer kill on a deer was at 350 yards; my 3X9 happened to be set on 3.

My tri-focal glasses pretty much preclude the use of iron sights, so for close-range hunting I believe a low-magnification scope of one or two power is sufficient. For walking in open country, I'm highly in favor of a maximum of 3X9.

For all around hunting use, I don't really think anybody has beaten the old Weaver K4. I think maybe a K3 with a 40mm objective lens would be about as good as it gets. I'm talking general hunting, here, not prairie dogs or benchrest...

My personal preference for a reticle is the duplex crosshairs...

FWIW, Art
Art Eatman is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07374 seconds with 9 queries