The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights > Legal and Political

 
 
Thread Tools
Old December 1, 2002, 01:25 AM   #1
Drjones
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 16, 2002
Posts: 1,239
Can a Felon have a drivers license?

Can he?

If so, there is a big problem.

You mean to tell me that a felon is allowed to drive a car but cannot own a little stinking GUN???

Drjones is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 01:53 AM   #2
MitchSchaft
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2001
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,207
Yes they can. I know drug felons at my work who have licenses.
MitchSchaft is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 02:03 AM   #3
Redlg155
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 13, 2001
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 2,307
Yes, they can have a drivers license provided that their license has not been suspended or revoked. Having one is essential just to make a living.

The problem with the law is that there is no disctinction between a violent and a non violent felon. Most folks agree that felons with a violent criminal history should not be allowed to own guns.

On the other hand there are some non violent felons that have since cleaned up their lifestyle and have become model citizens for many years.

Since all felons are pretty much treated equally, they all suffer the same consequences and Presidential Pardons are but a dream to most folks.

Good Shooting
RED
Redlg155 is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 02:05 AM   #4
cosmos7
Member
 
Join Date: August 15, 2002
Location: PRK
Posts: 54
Hey, in a number of states, once you're convicted of a felony, you can never vote again...
cosmos7 is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 02:18 AM   #5
Hkmp5sd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
The one I like is someone convicted of DUI that has his licensed revoked and then is given a permit to allow him to drive to and from work. Seems like giving a guy convicted of robbing convenience stores a permit to keep a handgun at home.
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor: Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Home Safety, Personal Protection, Range Safety Officer

NRA Life Member
Hkmp5sd is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 06:51 AM   #6
Long Path
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,888
Yup. Though in my state, drug violations will usually get your license suspended.

There's currently quite the battle going on over what rights a convicted felon should have, once he's served his time and repaid his debt to society. For one thing, there's a felon (who, say, committed his third DWI, or stupidly carried a gun on university campus and got caught, or who got convicted of a major tax evasion), and then there's a FELON (Who's murdered, or committed Aggravated Sexual Assault, or Aggravated Robbery, etc.). Our state, for example, has 5 degrees (Capital, 1st degree, 2nd degree, 3rd degree, State Jail [equivalent of "4th Degree]) of felonies-- would we treat a released 1st degree felon the same as a State Jail releasee? (Presumably, a Capital murder convict never legally sees the light of day.)

And what about voting rights? Should a convicted felon be allowed to vote for Sheriff? For District Attorney? For district judge? Remember, in some sparesely populated areas, these elections are sometimes won on very meager margins. If you get county or precinct full of convicts, what kind of elected government are you going to have?

Should we curtail these rights temporarily, with a sunset to their impositions, say, a decade later?

Take a driver's license from a convict, and in most areas, he can't get to and from work. Now we've denied him of a legal means of transportation to pursue a livelyhood. What are we forcing him into? Should he just be issued an "Occupational License"? (These are licenses that are supposed to restrict driving to the most basic of needs: getting to and from work, worship, food buying, school. They obviously get abused heavily.)

These and other questions weigh heavily. Please check the Legal & Political Forum to weigh in or read more on this thread, as that's where I'm moving it.

L.P.
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page
Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________ Better and Better, the blog. _____
Long Path is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 09:33 AM   #7
KSFreeman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2001
Location: Lafayette, Indiana--American-occupied America
Posts: 5,416
It depends (but you knew I'd say that) on what type of felon.

Many states have offenses in which a conviction will suspend your license for a set period of time (pot, OWI, LSA, RD, non-payment of child support, etc.). In most states upon the conviction of your third "major" traffic offense (usually OWI), you will be suspended for 5 to 10 years. This category of suspension is usually entitled Habitual Traffic Violator or Offender.

If you are convicted of driving HTV, you will be suspended for life as well as possible fines and jail sentence. Each state is different.
__________________
"Arguments of policy must give way to a constitutional command." Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 602 (1980).
KSFreeman is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 11:17 AM   #8
TallPine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 11, 2002
Location: Montana
Posts: 528
At the risk of getting incinerated, I would suggest the following categories:

1) Currently incarcerated: obviously no rights at all concerning guns, cars, voting, etc.

2) Probation: whatever the probation agreement is for the particular individual/jurisdiction (probation being kind of an extension of incarceration)

3) Completed sentence/probation: same rights as everyone else, including owning guns.

Of course, a judge could also add certain specifications to a individual's sentence that might last for life, such as firearm prohibition. The way it is now is an "ex post facto" law for those who were convicted years ago. How long until a speeding ticket (however long in the past) becomes a reason for denying firearm ownership?

If we would stop locking people up for the "crime" of self-medication, we would have room to keep the really violent offenders in prison until they are no longer a threat to society.
__________________
"The inherent right in the people to reform their government, I do not deny; and they have another right, and that is to resist unconstitutional laws without overturning the government." --Daniel Webster
TallPine is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 02:33 PM   #9
Seeker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 30, 2001
Location: Lacomb, Oregon
Posts: 1,393
TallPine, I agree with your points but, would have to mention the obvious. Some people are just plain violent and predatory and some one that has proved themselves to be of this sort need to be kept seperate from civilized people for a VERY long time.
__________________
Molon Labe
Seeker

"The oppressed should rebel, and they will continue to rebel and raise disturbance until their civil rights are fully restored to them and all partial distinctions, exclusions and incapacitations are removed." --Thomas Jefferson
Don't Tread On Me!
"Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none" -- Thomas Jefferson

In order to rally people, governments need enemies. They want us to be afraid, to hate, so we will rally behind them. And if they do not have a real enemy, they will invent one in order to mobilize us.
-Thich Nhat Hanh
Seeker is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 02:39 PM   #10
pax
Staff
 
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: Washington state
Posts: 6,983
Quote:
The problem with the law is that there is no disctinction between a violent and a non violent felon. Most folks agree that felons with a violent criminal history should not be allowed to own guns.

On the other hand there are some non violent felons that have since cleaned up their lifestyle and have become model citizens for many years.
It is illegal for felons to own guns.

The felons who are still felony-prone, have no respect for the law and own guns anyway.

The felons who have cleaned up their acts and become model citizens obey the law and don't own guns.

Hmmmm.

pax
__________________
Kathy Jackson
My personal website: Cornered Cat
pax is offline  
Old December 1, 2002, 07:09 PM   #11
spacemanspiff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2002
Location: alaska
Posts: 3,208
i think that when a felon who was convicted of non-violent crimes is released from prison and has completed all the court mandated activities, they should then decide about the other rights by a best-of-seven game of rock paper scissors. the loser will concede completely.

felons convicted of violent crimes should have to spend a full year as rosie's personal maid.

(hey, maybe they'd 'snap' and do something crazy but justifiable, you never know)
__________________
"Every man alone is sincere; at the entrance of a second person hypocrisy begins." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." - Soren Kierkegaard
spacemanspiff is offline  
Old December 2, 2002, 12:24 AM   #12
Billll
Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Littleton CO
Posts: 52
Not only do felons get drivers licenses, they get preferred insurance rates for not getting any traffic tickets for the last, say, 3-5 years. And, just like everybody else, they don't need to know how to drive, either.
__________________
Summas Scientes: Noli Hic Domi Temptare.
Billll is offline  
Old December 2, 2002, 12:29 AM   #13
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,576
To get back to the original post: Bad Guys rarely use cars as deadly weapons. With guns, it's obviously different.

Before the feds got into the act, Texas law allowed a felon who either had served his time or was on parole to keep a gun in his house as a means of self-defense. Self-defense is a human right, as almost every pro-gun poster has stated on TFL at one time or another. The feds now say it is not, without regard to the violence of any particular felony.

If some dude loses his license for Driving While Stupid, giving him a restricted to-and-from-work DL makes sense. That's when Dudley Doofus is sober and of no potential harm. If he wants to bar-hop, he can take a bus or cab.

In court decisions, as with most other things, there ain't no "One size fits all".

Art
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old December 2, 2002, 12:49 PM   #14
jimpeel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 1999
Location: Longmont, CO, USA
Posts: 4,488
Not only felons, but the mentally challenged and the downright stupid as well.

The entire cross section of persons who are denied firearms ownership are allowed to drive.
__________________
Gun Control: The premise that a woman found in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is morally superior to allowing that same woman to defend her life with a firearm.

"Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house." - Jules Henri Poincare

"Three thousand people died on Sept. 11 because eight pilots were killed"
-- former Northwest Airlines pilot Stephen Luckey
jimpeel is offline  
 

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09675 seconds with 9 queries