The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 20, 1999, 03:56 PM   #1
CAK
Member
 
Join Date: September 9, 1999
Location: Seattle
Posts: 77
When Federal tactical buckshot hit the scene a few years ago, I heard that it didn't always function 100% in gas guns, especially with the Benelli. Has this problem been worked out? Was it ever a problem?

------------------
El Cid '89

CAK is offline  
Old November 20, 1999, 05:40 PM   #2
Rosco P. Coltrain
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 7, 1999
Posts: 267
Yes, it has been worked out. The Benelli will cycle a wide range of loads. But the best solution is to use real buckshot loads instead of the reduced "tactical" loads. Tactical buckshot is a design trade-off, you trade some terminal balistics for a reduction in recoil. In theory this would increase the effectiveness of some shotgun users. Gas opperated shotguns do not have as much recoil as other actions, so the trade-off of a reduced load might not be worth as much.

I am not against "tactical" loads per say, but they are an equipment solution to what is a training problem. I think proper weapon fit and training are better solutions than using less effective ammo.
Rosco P. Coltrain is offline  
Old November 20, 1999, 08:38 PM   #3
Douglas in CT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 1998
Location: Beautiful Coastal Connecticut, USA
Posts: 104
My $.02
I have a M1 Super 90 and have shot both the S&B "00" and the Federal Tactical "00" - all in 2 3/4 inch shells.

Observations:
* I am consistently amazed at the recoil difference between the two.

* The S&B, although more aggressive punching through the paper target, is more aggressive on my shoulder (leaving wonderful blood vessel grid marks from the butt plate) when compared with shooting the Federal Tactical round (no marks).
No need for tattooing with the S&B round.



------------------
Regards,
~Douglas in CT


Douglas in CT is offline  
Old November 20, 1999, 11:16 PM   #4
Dorcas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 194
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>When Federal tactical buckshot hit the scene a few years ago, I heard that it didn't always function 100% in gas guns, especially with the Benelli.[/quote]

The Benelli M1S90 is recoil operated not gas operated. BTW, mine functions just fine with Federal low recoil 00 and #4 buck. However if it didn't Wolf ( www.gunsprings.com } sells a reduced power recoil spring, which is supposed to improve functioning with reduced loads.

bkm...

------------------
Anyone worth shooting, is worth shooting twice...
Dorcas is offline  
Old November 21, 1999, 01:52 AM   #5
Cat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 467
My Remington 1100's both fire the tactical buck from Federal without a problem. These guns are standard 2 3/4" chambered firearms.
Neil Casper
Cat is offline  
Old November 22, 1999, 09:40 PM   #6
Edmund Rowe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 1998
Location: Warner Robins, GA USA
Posts: 351
I took a 3 day tactical shotgun class last February with my M1 Super 90 Benelli.

Most everyone was using Federal Tactical buckshot when the drill called for buckshot. The Benelli people were starting to have malfunctions a day or two into class except mine. I believe this happened because at the end of each day on the range I scrupulously cleaned and oiled mine. Another student said one could eat off of my shotgun.

Regarding semi-auto shotgun reliabilty, I was present during a conversation between 2 professional firearms instructors where one said at Gunsite the Brand X started malfing first and Brand Y started malfing last during a long class. (5 days?) The other instructor said he's seen the exact opposite. That told me reliability isn't governed by the brand name (usually). At the very least, maintenance and cleaning is something we have some control over so I guess my advice is to keep your social shotgun clean as a whistle. That goes for pumps as well as semi-autos.

Edmund

Edmund Rowe is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06922 seconds with 9 queries