The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 30, 2002, 09:48 PM   #1
Kayser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2002
Location: Illinois :(
Posts: 550
How much forcing cone wear?

I'm wondering what's considered "ok" for forcing cone wear.

This is in the continuing saga of the Python. Had it out at the range for the second time, picked up a drop rod and checked everything out, and got it properly sighted in.

My only remaining concern is the forcing cone. I bought the gun "new" froma guy on gunbroker with a very high rating. In addition to suspicious tracks on the cylinder indicative of lots of hand-spinning at the very least, I'm now seeing what appears to be a good amount of erosion in the forcing cone.

I've put ~300 rounds through it since I've had it, 1/2 of which have been lead nosed 38's.

In any case, after cleaning there really appears to be a decent amount of crud in the cone. Primarily in the form of thin concentric rings, not evenly spaced along its length. When shining a light down it, the brightness difference between the ringed areas and the flat areas are significant. Feeling it out with a thin piece of plastic reveals that they're not particularly deep but they're certainly visible. At one point, they appear to have even picked up a little copper buildup. If my stupid digital camera's batteries hadn't died I'd post a picture.

I guess its also worth adding that I can't put a full 6 rounds through it without having the cylinder rod become completely loosened to the point where I have to righten it manually. Can this become unsafe?

Anyway, my best guess now is that this gun has been made available for use at the store range where it came from. Kind of annoying if that's the case.

Last edited by Kayser; June 30, 2002 at 11:43 PM.
Kayser is offline  
Old June 30, 2002, 11:26 PM   #2
AC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 5, 1998
Posts: 268
Its hard to tell without looking at it but concentric rings on a forcing cone are typically from the cutter, not wear from shooting. Probably a dull cutter causes it. Forcing cone erosion looks like sandblasting and you loose sharp edges.

A drop of locktite or linseed oil (will slowly die and have the same effect) should fix your unscrewing ejector rod.

If the forcing cone continues to bother you any gunsmith that does much revolver work will have cone cutters and yours probably wouldn't need much to take out those rings. If it shoots well you might not want to worry about those rings, but it is hard to tell how bad they are without looking at it.
AC is offline  
Old June 30, 2002, 11:31 PM   #3
Kayser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2002
Location: Illinois :(
Posts: 550
Got off my butt and took some pictures. By losing sharp edges, do you mean at the entrance to the cone at the cylinder gap, or at the transition from cone to barrel?

Again, thanks for the advice. Me <-- still a'learnin.

Kayser is offline  
Old July 1, 2002, 12:16 AM   #4
C.R.Sam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 1999
Location: Dewey, AZ
Posts: 12,858
That is one ugly forcing cone. Probably came that way tho. Does not look like erosion.

Like AC said....if it is causing leading or accuracy problems, get it smothed out by a COMPETENT smith.

Sam
C.R.Sam is offline  
Old July 1, 2002, 12:25 AM   #5
Kayser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2002
Location: Illinois :(
Posts: 550
By leading do you mean throwing lead or causing buildup after many rounds?

Assuming this isn't going to cause some kind of "exciting" event unexpectedly while shooting, or otherwise damage the gun over the long term, I guess it doesn't bother me too much. Would 1000+ rounds tend to smooth this kind of marring out, or is this a lifetime kind of thing?

I talked with the guy I bought it from and he claims it came straight from Colt through the wholesaler and was unfired once it got in his hands. I tend to believe him because his gunbroker record is impeccable. He said I should take up any quality control issues with Colt. On a $1000 gun, I'm tempted to write them a letter....
Kayser is offline  
Old July 1, 2002, 10:00 AM   #6
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
STOP!

How does it shoot?

If it shoots well shoot it.
If it shoots poorly fix it ( www.americanpistol.com )

Either way, no whining, please.

Me, I prefer Rugers, 'cause I KNOW they ugly..........
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old July 1, 2002, 10:45 AM   #7
C.R.Sam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 1999
Location: Dewey, AZ
Posts: 12,858
Quote:
By leading do you mean throwing lead or causing buildup after many rounds?
Either or both. Looks like that rough cone area could gather lead and jacket material.

Tim (WS2) would call me a whiner. I won't accept that level of workmanship on a new gun. Especially on a $1,000 six gun.

Sam
C.R.Sam is offline  
Old July 2, 2002, 09:31 PM   #8
AC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 5, 1998
Posts: 268
Kayser, By 'losing sharp edges' I meant at the back of the barrel not where the cone ends up front.

That looks like a factory rough cutting job, not like wear. I wouldn't expect shooting to smooth that out, but as folks are saying, see how it shoots.
AC is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03572 seconds with 7 queries