The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 12, 2011, 01:30 AM   #1
cajun47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2007
Location: swamp people
Posts: 539
.45acp anti bear round(abr)?

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct...ductTabReviews

is that what that big old chunky bullet is made for?
cajun47 is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 01:39 AM   #2
Stiofan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Location: Panhandle, Idaho
Posts: 714
Yes. Tim Sundles of Buffalo Bore started out designing his ammo for just this reason.
Stiofan is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 01:40 AM   #3
LockedBreech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
Yikes! That is a mean sucker! I've actually never even heard of a .45 loaded heavier than 230.

I do not purchase Buffalo Bore products, though. I just won't be that hard on my guns. I'm leery about even buying +p 9mm ammunition.
__________________
16 Pistols, 5 Rifles, 1 Shotgun, no time to shoot them
LockedBreech is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 02:25 AM   #4
8shot357
Junior member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2010
Posts: 1,740
As long as it feed in a semi, but they do make 45scp revolvers too. Maybe it's more for those.
8shot357 is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 10:20 AM   #5
jrothWA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 11, 2006
Posts: 2,529
Hiking in the Cascades, I'd sometimes pack..

my 1911 loaded with Hornady 230gr FMJ-FP. never needed to draw but felt confident with them. The above load is no longer made, but I got two twenty round boxes left, plus they work NICELY on bowling pins!

Spoke with Sierra Techs and they recommend the heaviest FMJ you can handle and at the maximum velocity, for dealing with heavy bodies critters.
jrothWA is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 10:49 AM   #6
MLeake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
LawScholar, theoretically at least, BB isn't any harder on guns than normal +P. From what I've read, Tim Sundles gets his velocities by sustaining a middle-high pressure for longer duration, instead of going for a high peak pressure. If that is true, then those loads never actually approach the limits of the gun.

Pressure spike is often the big deal... an example is somebody loading a rifle cartridge with pistol powder. Pistol powder burns faster, and spikes, although it doesn't achieve the pressure over duration of slower-burning rifle powder. But that spike has blown up a good number of rifles, when pistol powder rounds have accidentally been loaded, chambered, and fired.
MLeake is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 11:04 AM   #7
Rugerismisticness
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2010
Posts: 909
I stick with a 230 semi wadcutter at 950fps. It has great penetration, good hydrostatic shock, and I have no feeding issues with my P345.
Rugerismisticness is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 05:07 PM   #8
popplecop
Member
 
Join Date: August 11, 2011
Location: Centeral Wisconsin
Posts: 29
First of all if I were really concerned about bear, I'd be carryong at least a .44 mag with 300 gr bullets. Yet I always am carrying a 1911 when prowling the woods anything from a .22 rf to a45 acp. I'd just stoke it with 230 gr. FMJ rounds, all my 45s handle them well. Will be in black bear country this next week fishing and I'm taking a 38 Super with 130 gr. +Ps FMJs, really don't worry about bear much anyway. When working I live trapped and steel trapped bear doing damage carried my S&W Md. 15 38 sp., that was we were issued in those years.
popplecop is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 05:13 PM   #9
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,973
Compared to a 10mm or 357 mag 200gr hardcast @ 1300 fps it is still a weak sister.
jmr40 is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 05:23 PM   #10
rantingredneck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,728
I've handloaded some 260 gr. Speer SJHP's in .45 before. According to published data I wasn't in +P territory but I was tickling the top of the SAAMI max for .45ACP standard pressure. I had some mild cratering of primers though. Decided that a good .357 could do what I needed done better than the .45ACP.
rantingredneck is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 05:23 PM   #11
Sixer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 16, 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,891
Quote:
First of all if I were really concerned about bear, I'd be carryong at least a .44 mag with 300 gr bullets.
This.
Sixer is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 05:48 PM   #12
Mello2u
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,424
Seems like the best "bear load" on the market for the .45ACP. Might even be better than what you can do hand loading.

While Buffalo Bore lists their 255gr bullet at 925fps, DoubleTap lists their 255gr .45ACP load at a velocity of 875fps.

Buffalo Bore Ammunition 454 Casull 360 Grain Lead Long Wide Nose @ 1425 fps and with a Muzzle Energy: 1623 ft. lbs. Ooooooo
Mello2u is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 05:58 PM   #13
checkmyswag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 29, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,328
bear bells
checkmyswag is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 06:28 PM   #14
Alaska444
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2010
Posts: 1,231
I still believe the .45 ACP is a two legged defense gun, not a bear gun. However, someone in Mt McKinnley in Alaska killed a grizzly a year ago with a .45 ACP. I will stick to my .44 Ruger SRH with the Buffalo Bore ammo that they have for that.
Alaska444 is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 07:18 PM   #15
Mr.Blue
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 30, 2011
Location: SE Wisconsin & Long Island, NY
Posts: 418
Do you know the particulars? How many hits did he get on the Grizzly?
Mr.Blue is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 08:15 PM   #16
jgcoastie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Location: Kodiak, Alaska
Posts: 2,118
Even as mean as it looks, it's highly anemic for a serious bear defense gun.
jgcoastie is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 08:21 PM   #17
LockedBreech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
I'm curious about the power of a standard-power .44 Magnum load vs. a standard-power .45 ACP load. I know the .44 is more powerful, but how much more?

As I understand, the .45 and .357 Magnum are generally equivalent, except for particularly hot loads like Federal's 357B
__________________
16 Pistols, 5 Rifles, 1 Shotgun, no time to shoot them
LockedBreech is offline  
Old August 12, 2011, 09:49 PM   #18
TXGunNut
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: If you have to ask...
Posts: 2,860
Sounds like it's very close energy-wise to a blackpowder 45 Colt load. Would rather have a Keiith boolit but a 1911 is easier to pack in the woods and on the street. A good gun on the hip beats a geat gun in the safe.
OTOH I've had less-than-optimal results with wild boar hogs using a 45acp. No bear expert but suspect a bear can be as tough or tougher than any hog. I carry a 45 Colt with either my Keith cast boolits or 300 gr XTP's as a backup to my rifle when hunting big pigs, will likely carry the same on my rare trips to bear country.
TXGunNut is offline  
Old August 13, 2011, 10:47 AM   #19
sandbag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 18, 2008
Posts: 642
Revolver Round

If you have a 45 ACP DA revolver,Buffalo Bore makes a 45 Auto Rim,which is essentially a 45 ACP anyway,with a 255 gr hardcast round nose flat point bullet.It goes about 1000 fps.Should be ok for black bear.It has wicked recoil in an S&W Model 22-4,which is a pretty hefty firearm.
I'm hardly recoil shy,being right at home with 44 Mags and my recently purchased 10mm Glock 20SF,just that this round actually numbed my hand.
FWIW the Glock really dampens the 10mm recoil-I wonder what those 10mm rounds would be like in the rarely seen Blackhawk convertible?
sandbag is offline  
Old August 13, 2011, 11:06 PM   #20
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,799
grizzly v. .45acp

The grizzly v. .45acp shooting occurred on Nat. Park lands up there and was pretty well documented. A little snooping should get anyone interested more details. This was just after the firearms regs changed in the Parks and the episode got a bit of attention.

Shooter was protecting his girl friend as I recall and got multiple hits. Not sure of his score.
bamaranger is offline  
Old August 13, 2011, 11:25 PM   #21
chuckscap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2007
Posts: 250
I've got a 1911 Springfield V16 Long Slide that I carry in those kind of situations. It's built for 45 Super rounds. Seems like the Buffalo Bore 255 hard cast is a perfect fit for my gun ... Gonna have to try it.

chuckscap is offline  
Old August 14, 2011, 09:52 AM   #22
cajun47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2007
Location: swamp people
Posts: 539
hard cast bullets. will that work with the glock 30?
cajun47 is offline  
Old August 14, 2011, 12:15 PM   #23
COSteve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2009
Posts: 1,344
At only 484ft/lbs of muzzle energy, I'd have some reservations, very serious reservations about shooting a bear, any bear with that round.
COSteve is offline  
Old August 14, 2011, 12:29 PM   #24
Alaska444
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2010
Posts: 1,231
I carry my SP101 in .357 as my daily carry. I could use that as my woods carry as well, but I don't. I go to my Ruger SRH in .44 magnum just because it affords more reliable stopping power especially for black bear.

The .45 ACP is a great round for daily carry against people. Yes, it has killed bears when it had to, but it is all about reliability every time that counts. I hope I never need to test these theories, but it is readily available.

We were up the St Joe river yesterday past Avery and took a little gander into the woods. I actually had both the SP101 in pocket carry as I always do and my .44 magnum in cross carry bandolier style. There was also 4 of us in the group. If the ONLY gun you have is a .45 ACP, load it up with the best hardcast bullet you can find. Otherwise, get a good woods gun, at minimum in .357 magnum.
Alaska444 is offline  
Old August 14, 2011, 12:34 PM   #25
Don Glock
Junior member
 
Join Date: September 16, 2010
Posts: 1,141
if it meets advertised velocities, it would be a good 45acp bear round. you want penetration to get through those layers of fat.

however, i would not fire it out of a pistol with an unsupported chamber.
Don Glock is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06916 seconds with 7 queries