![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 864
|
On my wife's Marlin 336 (which I also hunt with), I put a Leupold FX-II 2.5x20 Ultralight fixed power scope. Total weight of scope, rings, and bases is 9.5 ounces. I don't think you can get a lighter scope. I am exceedingly pleased with this scope. Very fast on target, lots of eye relief. 2.5X is plenty of magnification for a woods gun. I sighted it in at 100 yards, and I have no problem popping soda cans at 150 yards (with about 6 inches of hold over).
Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,820
|
4x
Back in the day, if somebody was going to mount a scope, almost everybody ran a fixed 4x on a deer rifle, Marlin 30-30's, .35's, bolt '06, you name it, a fixed 4x was thought just fine. I'd have to say it is not to much magnification.
You end up in a situation where you are counting antler points as on a WMA, or trying to find a whole in the brush to slip a bullet, and the extra magnification will be useful. Too, I can tell you that it will work just fine on moving deer in the woods. If you wonder about this, I'd hazard that lots of .22's have fixed 4x's on them, and get used on all sorts of targets, largish and small, moving and not, out to 100 yds and nobody thinks it odd. Finally, despite the advance of modern scopes, I'd pick a fixed power rig over a variable based on simplicity and theoretical durability. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|