The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 8, 2013, 07:33 PM   #1
GunXpatriot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 393
RG Industries Model 26 .25 ACP?

So the only thing I really hear about RG guns is that they are bottom of the barrel, some of the worst guns ever made.

I heard one story (and I don't know if it's true), but as small cheaply made handguns are commonly called "Saturday Night Specials", I heard RG manufactured a .357 magnum revolver called the "saturday night special". Apparently, due to recoil, the crappy grips would actually scratch up your hands.

I really don't know anything about this company, or this gun. I see some of their guns on gunbroker, like one of those .22 short revolvers, and looking it up on youtube, they would actually throw gunpowder residue, or something, on your hands and burn you.

After a quick Wikipedia search, apparently, they are part of Umarex now. I also know (or, I think) it was the RG Model 14S that was used by John Hinckley Jr. in the attempted assassination of President Reagan.

Pertaining to the gun, I hear they have design flaws all over the place. I also heard the 26 can fire unintentionally.

I guess RG closed after losing it's insurance over several lawsuits pertaining to public safety.

http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=13113

Besides that, though, I really have no information about this gun. That link kind of explains the company, though.

What do you think I should do with the thing? I don't think I can get too much money for it. Condition-wise, it's about this picture or better...



The good news is, I haven't heard of them blowing up. Actually, this is my Grandpa's. He used to carry it in his pocket, loaded. obviously, unintentional discharge wasn't an issue. He lost the magazine, though.

I was thinking of taking it off his hands

But really, I was wondering if anyone had experience with one of these? Seems like some were reliable enough and some couldn't fire a magazine without at least one issue.

Shall I just find a magazine and see how it works? I was thinking I'd go to a police gun buy-back and actually make money on the thing... What do you guys think?

Last edited by GunXpatriot; June 8, 2013 at 07:50 PM.
GunXpatriot is offline  
Old June 8, 2013, 09:25 PM   #2
oldgunsmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2013
Posts: 278
A magazine for one of those will cost more than anyone who knows what it is would give for the gun.
oldgunsmith is offline  
Old June 8, 2013, 09:42 PM   #3
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 19,047
Where are you in New York State?

Methinks an RG with no magazine would be an excellent candidate for some gun buyback program. Get a few bucks for the piece of slag, and use it as part payment for a real gun. Win-Win.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old June 8, 2013, 10:10 PM   #4
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 11,106
Don't use "buybacks!" It gives the antis ideas that they actually work.
If you aren't going to keep the gun, sell it to a parts dealer like Numrich.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old June 8, 2013, 11:23 PM   #5
Kev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2013
Posts: 661
I agree AGAINST the buy backs!
I have heard people say that in other threads and it really irks me to death!
Why show them that their program is a success?

I'd melt mine into a glob of abstract art before using any of the antis programs
Kev is offline  
Old June 9, 2013, 02:08 AM   #6
GunXpatriot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 393
Quote:
A magazine for one of those will cost more than anyone who knows what it is would give for the gun.
Unfortunately

I seen one on gunbroker for like $25, maybe a year or so back.

I do agree with the problems concerning buybacks. I hate it when they show buyback "success" on the news, when looking at the firearms they get, almost no one but law-abiding citizens turned in their guns because "they didn't want them anymore."

Fine, but crap, find a responsible gun owner, sell to a pawn shop or LGS. The stupidity of some of these people baffles me. I see people trade in guns worth several hundred, and some worth several THOUSAND for $100 worth of grocery money. The only people getting ripped off are the idiots who use the program being law-abiding.

However, at least the RG Model 26 is worth trading in, no matter what you do, you make money on the thing. Even still, I'd like to have it inspected to see if it will fire safely. It's worth so little though, I'll likely just keep the thing.
GunXpatriot is offline  
Old June 9, 2013, 07:25 AM   #7
JohnMoses
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2008
Posts: 200
The Illinois State Rifle Association took a truckload of junk guns to a Chicago buyback and walked away with $26,000 that they used for range improvements and young shooter programs. A buddy of mine goes to a lot of auctions and will buy any junk gun for under $50 just to flip it at the next buyback stupidity. Just because a lot of people use gun buybacks doesn't mean they are 'successful' - the only thing they are good for is draining the coffers of whoever is paying the tab, letting some felon dispose of a hot gun no questions asked, or robbing some poor widow of a valuable heirloom. A successful gun buyback makes as much sense as reality t v.
JohnMoses is offline  
Old June 9, 2013, 09:37 PM   #8
GunXpatriot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 393
Agree completely, JohnMoses.

It's frustrating IMO.

Anyone remember when they said they recovered an "AT4 Anti-Tank Missile", when it was a one-time use empty shell? It's that kind of nonsense that get's idiots to buy into these. Even still, I'm glad they got that much money out of it. As much as I hate these buyback programs, some good comes out of them. At least the Anti's picked up the tab for guns that didn't even work/ didn't work correctly to begin with. :P
GunXpatriot is offline  
Old June 9, 2013, 09:58 PM   #9
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
I don't know of many gun shops that will buy those guns or take them in trade; they can't sell them because they can't warranty them (no parts) and because of liability concerns. The time, effort and cost involved in replacing the magazine (if it can be done at all) will be more than the gun is worth.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old June 11, 2013, 03:58 PM   #10
simonrichter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 771
This piece looks a lot like a brand of 8mm blank firing pistols common here in europe. The manufacturer is called Röhm and used the same plastic grip panels and also the abbrevation "RG" for his guns... Could it be that this one is simply a live firing version for the US market?

http://www.co2air.de/wbb2/attachment...chmentid=65154
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski
. ISSC PAR .223
simonrichter is offline  
Old June 11, 2013, 04:06 PM   #11
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
This piece looks a lot like a brand of 8mm blank firing pistols common here in europe. The manufacturer is called Röhm and it used the same plastic grip panels and also the abbrevation "RG" for its guns...
Your link doesn't work for me, but AFAIK in the USA, you are correct- Röhm and RG were the same. IIRC the company also built some other (generally cheap) handguns sold by American distributors under other brand names during the 1950s through the 1970s.
carguychris is offline  
Old June 11, 2013, 04:29 PM   #12
simonrichter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 771
oh, sorry - but just google "Röhm RG8" and you will see they look completely the same

Seems that it is basically the blank firing pistol's frame and system with a rifled barrel... No wonder it is considered kind of a crap...
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski
. ISSC PAR .223
simonrichter is offline  
Old September 15, 2015, 11:54 PM   #13
Vern
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2015
Posts: 2
A friend ask me if I could take his RG model 26 that would not feed a cartridge into the chamber and see if I could get it to feed. It had set on a shelf for approx. 30 years. I had never seen one but brought it home and cleaned an lubricated it, I racked it a couple times and It did not feed the cartridge into the chamber. I racked it a couple more times and wham, it fired and resulted in a hole in my wall, and no, my finger was not on the trigger. After reading these posts, I agree that it is a piece of junk. I will recommend that he dig a hole in his back yard and bury it,
Vern is offline  
Old September 16, 2015, 01:44 AM   #14
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 11,106
Just part the gun out to Numrich or another gun parts company.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old September 16, 2015, 02:14 AM   #15
9x18_Walther
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
You are the proud owner of one of the worst "Saturday Night Specials" ever made. A Raven MP-25 would probably be more reliable.

WARNING: The RG Industries, 25 Auto caliber, model RG26, pistol may potentially MISFIRE and/or UNINTENTIONALLY DISCHARGE. With the magazine loaded. The first five rounds failed to fire. No firing pin impressions were apparent in the primers of the first three rounds but the fourth and fifth rounds contained faint firing pin impressions. Examination of the underside of the slide revealed that the metal ridges bordering the firing pin canal were worn down. As soon as the magazine was moved a slight distance, the weapon discharged, even though there was no finger near trigger. The top round in the magazine was examined. It interfered with the forward motion of the firing pin.

Either keep it (because you can), sell it to Numrich, or go to a gun buyback.

Or if you are feeling lucky, remove some of the internal components, sell them to Numrich and then go to a gun buyback with what is left.
9x18_Walther is offline  
Old September 16, 2015, 09:54 PM   #16
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
A "zombie thread", but as long as it is back to life, the gun used by John Hinckley in the attempt on the life of Pres. Reagan was a RG-14 revolver in .22 Long Rifle, not a .25 Auto.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old September 20, 2015, 11:28 PM   #17
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
Quote:
If you aren't going to keep the gun, sell it to a parts dealer like Numrich.
Numrich will offer you about $.02-.03 on the dollar.
gyvel is offline  
Old September 21, 2015, 01:36 PM   #18
TimSr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
Quote:
A Raven MP-25 would probably be more reliable.
My Raven P-25 from 1982 still works flawlessly.
TimSr is offline  
Old September 24, 2015, 08:43 PM   #19
DogTrot
Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 19
My spouse inherited hers from her dad. It would not operate reliably until I polished all the friction parts including the feed ramp and filed any sharp edges in the magazines. It has had hundreds of her reloaded rounds through it since then and it is surprisingly accurate. A little oil and TLC was all it took. It shot better than her Taurus .25 and was easier to handle. Now It fails to eject only every once in a while, but all in all it is fun to shoot.

Here is the before we polished the ramps and sliding parts with its attendant failure to ejects. I'll post the improved RG 26 video soon enough.

https://youtu.be/RVPtwC2j39E
DogTrot is offline  
Old September 24, 2015, 09:14 PM   #20
jimbob86
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
Your lovely spouse appeared to be about half a millimeter from a bad case of Walther Bite .....
jimbob86 is offline  
Old September 25, 2015, 07:15 PM   #21
Oysterboy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 3, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 970
RG are real guns and cheap at that. Some works some don't.

I had an RG-10 22 short that can fire 22 LR with no problem. Goes bang every time. This one you have to unscrew the pin and drop the cylinder in your hand to poke out the shells and reload.

I had an RG-15 22 LR that's more deluxe in that the cylinder swing out like a regular revolver and takes at least 15 pulls on the trigger to fire 6 shots.
Oysterboy is offline  
Old September 26, 2015, 05:26 AM   #22
HisSoldier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2007
Location: Oregoncoast
Posts: 1,793
I really advise folks to do a little research on the guns they may want to buy. Just google RG .25 ACP Zamak zinc and you'll get a lot of info.

Zinc alloys are junk, in my opinion. I've had Zamak (A well known zinc alloy) gears for cheap metal lathes fall apart in my fingers. At it's best it is a weak metal that is difficult to repair, and wears faster than even aluminum alloys. The maerial is so weak and mushy that I learned to be extra careful when tapping it, as the tap will pull right through the threads if your not careful with the feed handle.
__________________
CNC produced 416 stainless triggers to replace the plastic triggers on Colt Mustangs, Mustang Plus II's, MK IV Government .380's and Sig P238's and P938's. Plus Colt Mustang hardened 416 guide rods, and Llama .32 and .380 recoil spring buttons, checkered nicely and blued.
HisSoldier is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06748 seconds with 9 queries