|
|
|||||||
| Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 7, 2013, 05:42 AM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2008
Posts: 1,692
|
Whatother mfg. Is equal to s.a. Xds 45.
What other mfg .is equal to s.a. Xds 45. size and relibality .
__________________
No Gun Big Or Small Does It All |
|
|
June 7, 2013, 06:05 AM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2012
Posts: 1,031
|
Glock 36
|
|
|
|
June 7, 2013, 08:55 AM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Posts: 1,321
|
Glock 36
I considered a XDs when I bought my 36.
__________________
Strive to carry the handgun you would want anywhere, everywhere; forget that good area bullcrap. "Wouldn't want to / Nobody volunteer to" get shot by _____ is not indicative of quickly incapacitating. |
|
|
|
June 7, 2013, 09:02 AM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: April 5, 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,461
|
pps in 9mm and 40.
in 45, nothing. |
|
|
|
June 7, 2013, 09:06 AM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2005
Posts: 367
|
Glock 36 is quite a bit bigger than a XDS,a Kahr CW 45 might be closer in size ,but not sure how it compares as far as reliability.
|
|
|
|
June 7, 2013, 11:33 AM
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2007
Posts: 1,996
|
+1 on the CW45 recommendation. I just hit 500 virtually flawless rounds through mine. I only have had two light primer strikes on some old fiocchi jhp's._
|
|
|
|
June 7, 2013, 08:45 PM
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,823
|
My 1911 3.5" is close enough for me, except it feels sooo much better in my hand.
|
|
|
|
June 7, 2013, 10:22 PM
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: June 11, 2008
Posts: 52
|
The only other handgun that I think could validly compare would be the Kahr PM45 - which is just a tad smaller, and a tad lighter. I have the XDS (bi-tone model) and like it...a lot! It's my EDC. However, in researching them both, the Kahr didn't seem quite as reliable (after all, Kahr clearly tells its owner that it recommends a 200 round break-in) - and it's more expensive! [BTW: I have the Kahr PM40 and yes, had some issues in the early stages with FTF and FTE's. Even now, I wouldn't consider it quite as reliable as my XDS (which, so far, has been perfect).] I've only put about 175 rounds through the XDS, but have had no problems at all! I feel quite confident that, if needed, it will go "boom."
|
|
|
|
|
|
