View Single Post
Old April 5, 2013, 03:09 PM   #2
CPO15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 6, 2010
Location: Near Fincastle, VA
Posts: 148
OK, 110 views with no replies. I'll jump in:

Pf9 was not one bit pleasant for me to shoot. I was not accurate with it, had too frequent jams and I hated the recoil. While I have not shot one, the LC9 seems to be a near clone of the Pf9, but with a better fit/finish and CS support. I would not expect it to be a significantly different shooting experience, although I would expect less jams.

I ditched the Pf9 and am now quite happy with the Kahr MK9, the CW9 is a less expensive alternative. These guns are a joy to shoot. If you could see your way to include a Kahr in the consideration, I think you'd be pleased.

But, if you're only considering the two in your inquiry, go with the Ruger: the CS alone is worth the expense.
CPO15 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02586 seconds with 8 queries