View Single Post
Old January 16, 2011, 09:20 PM   #15
gc70
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
Aguila Blanca,

You shift the question from the meaning of IS to the meaning of USER and your answer is then based on intent.

I wonder whether such a standard would work. A restriction based on intent would be essentially meaningless. The courts generally presume that any clause in a law is not intended to be without effect, so the courts will try to ascribe a meaning and effect to "is an unlawful user."
gc70 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02621 seconds with 8 queries