Quote:
Originally Posted by HKFan9
I posted my comment about CZ because it was a known issue with a firearm usually held in high regards, but I have a major issue with this guys logic. Anything in life simply can't be judged by one example, him being an instructor and an expert should know this. I have seen my fair share of Glocks fail on the training range, I don't go around telling people they are poorly made problematic guns.  |
According to the author's conversation in the comments, these 4 CZs are simply an example, not the whole basis for his opinion. He claims to have seen more CZ issues in many training sessions than issues from top tier brands. He names Glock, Sig, HK, and Beretta as notably more reliable.
I love the looks of CZs, but I've also seen too many issues to trust them as much as a USP or 92FS. Others' milage may vary.