Quote:
If you don't have the means to attach the stock to a pistol with sub-16" barrel, it's not an SBR.
It's like asking if since you have an extra Remington 870 stock and a handgun, is that an SBR?
I assume you want the stock purely for novelty purposes or for display?
|
What's got me confused here is that you have two out of the three necessary parts to make an illegal SBR, missing only the easily removable mainspring housing. In light of other absurd BATF rulings such as possession of an AR15 and any one of several M16 parts being a machine gun, I was wondering if they have deemed that as some sort of "intent" of making an SBR.
Not real keen on your metaphor of the 870 stock and the handgun as neither piece was ever intended for the other.
The stock was in a bunch of junk that I bought from an estate. Personally, other than being a bit of a novelty, I don't find shoulder stocks particularly useful. From a collector's point of view they are interesting, though.