Quote:
I just do not understand the thought process of these state agencies.
|
It is all about risk reduction. The folks in charge are trying to reduce
their risk, not yours.
If they allowed EMTs/paramedics/firefighters to carry guns and something bad happened (e.g., ND in the firehouse, unjustified shooting, etc.), then there would be a big scandal and the big guy's job would be at risk. If, on the other hand, an EMT/paramedic/firefighter is killed or injured by a perp, then that is just looked on as a terrible tragedy and not the fault of the fire chief.
So from their point of view, allowing employees to carry guns is all downside with no upside.
I don't agree with the policy, but I think that I see where it comes from. The prime directive of many high ranking public employees is "Thou shalt not jeopardize thy pension." Everything else is secondary.