One of our problems is that we get hung up on exact definitions.
"Assault rifle"
"Magazine"
"Clip"
Sigh
When what we SHOULD be doing is looking at the overall message that is being conveyed... A gunny sees a TV commentator talking about how a group of ROTC students are "shooting assault rifles" at an organized rifle match, and writes them a three page diatribe chewing them out about the exact definition of "assault rifle" instead of thanking them for showing the nice young people and their responsible handling of firearms.
And then the gunny is surprised when they do a negative story the next time. Because that's what they think people want. Reporters aren't special people - they react, and you can manipulate HOW they react.
How does the ACLU maintain a good relationship with the press? They are NICE to them... So the press is nice to them back, even when they decide that something unpopular gets their attention...
Last edited by Bogie; October 7, 2008 at 02:28 PM.
|