View Single Post
Old October 2, 2009, 10:07 AM   #5
htjyang
Member
 
Join Date: September 4, 2009
Location: People's Republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 32
What an irony. I actually suggested something like this back on Sept. 4th. Now that it has happened, I'm getting cold feet. The one question I can't shake from my head is: This is a Commerce Clause challenge masquerading as a 2nd Amendment case. If I can see through it, so can the courts. If they can see through it, they're unlikely to agree to reasoning that will ultimately undermine Wickard-Raich. Do we really need additional bad case law on this issue?

Not only do I share Bartholomew Roberts's concern, there is also the practical standing issue raised by Fremmer. Perhaps it is best to have their standing rejected and have the law preserved rather than have it struck down.
htjyang is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02779 seconds with 8 queries