When he says
Quote:
I would hold that the Yolo County’s “good cause” requirement is constitutional because carrying concealed weapons in public is not conduct protected by the Second Amendment.
|
isn't that something of a half-truth analysis of Peruta already? Peruta didn't find that carrying concealed is protected, so much as some form of carry is protected. Like the right to travel is protected, but the "right" to fly, to drive, or travel via some other method specifically, isn't protected?