View Single Post
Old March 6, 2014, 10:42 AM   #48
JimDandy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
When he says
Quote:
I would hold that the Yolo County’s “good cause” requirement is constitutional because carrying concealed weapons in public is not conduct protected by the Second Amendment.
isn't that something of a half-truth analysis of Peruta already? Peruta didn't find that carrying concealed is protected, so much as some form of carry is protected. Like the right to travel is protected, but the "right" to fly, to drive, or travel via some other method specifically, isn't protected?
JimDandy is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03220 seconds with 8 queries