View Single Post
Old July 25, 2014, 08:49 PM   #11
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by dove
After this happened, it went back to the house for a concurrency vote. A group of chiefs of police, in addition to a few antis, made a huge freaking fuss saying that *this* one change completely nullified the power of the bill. Apparently the new universal-background-check extensions, mental health, school safety, and other provisions don't matter much to them. The antis now claim that school shootings usually involve shotguns (see where we are going?) and a certain police commissioner claims that nobody needs a rifle or shotgun. Seeing as it is already the case that prohibited persons can't get FIDs, it is clear, by definition, that they have exposed their intentions as desiring to restrict law-abiding citizens. In any event, they made enough fuss to get the house to reject the senate's mods. Now it goes to a 6 person joint committee to get hashed out. If the compromise differs significantly from the house and senate bills then it needs to be revoted on by both. Oh, and the legislative session ends on the 31st...
Somebody tell this certain police commissioner to take up the discussion with Vice President Biden. According to Biden, everyone needs a a shotgun (and nothing else).

Last edited by Tom Servo; July 25, 2014 at 09:01 PM. Reason: Edited quoted text
Aguila Blanca is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03612 seconds with 8 queries