Another perfect example of why my great-grandfather (the law professor) always maintained "There is no justice in the courts."
Talk about a weasel-word decision. So if the plaintiff's "injury" is due to third parties rather than to the law, he should be able to sue those third parties for redress, agreed? And, if he were to sue the FFL to obtain redress for his injury, I have no doubt that the FFL would be exonerated because "He's only following the law."
Catch-22.
|