View Single Post
Old November 2, 2009, 06:43 AM   #20
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
Quote:
Since the top of the front sight is held even with the top of the rear sight (top of the hammer nose in this case), the top of the rear sight, not the notch itself, needs to be lowered.
If the need is to lower the rear sight,
why would one deliberately hold high on the rear sight?
Why wouldn't one simply hold the top of the front sight with the bottom of the notch,
and then file the notch deeper if the need to hold even lower was apparent?
mykeal is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.02459 seconds with 8 queries