The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

MLeake · February 21, 2012, 05:15 PM

PK, you could say it's crazy.

You could say the plaintiff would be facing steep odds.

What you could NOT say is that the business owner could not possibly be sued, and would not have to spend any money on a legal defense, because of guaranteed immunity.

OTOH, in Wisconsin, if the business owner did NOT have a ban, then you could make that argument.

February 21, 2012, 05:15 PM	#43
MLeake Senior Member Join Date: November 15, 2007 Location: Outside KC, MO Posts: 10,128	PK, you could say it's crazy. You could say the plaintiff would be facing steep odds. What you could NOT say is that the business owner could not possibly be sued, and would not have to spend any money on a legal defense, because of guaranteed immunity. OTOH, in Wisconsin, if the business owner did NOT have a ban, then you could make that argument.