The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post - Kel-tec pf9 vs Ruger lc9

Walt Sherrill · April 9, 2013, 08:59 AM

I have a Kel-Tec PF9 and a Kahr CM9. I like them both, and find the Kahr more pleasant to shoot -- but for some reason I prefer (at least for now) the Kel-Tec. That may change as I shoot the CM9 more...

Were I faced with the choice of a Kel-Tec PF-9 and the Ruger LC9, the Ruger is a more attractive weapon. Functionally, I don't think there's much difference.

April 9, 2013, 08:59 AM	#19
Walt Sherrill Senior Member Join Date: February 15, 1999 Location: Winston-Salem, NC USA Posts: 6,348	I have a Kel-Tec PF9 and a Kahr CM9. I like them both, and find the Kahr more pleasant to shoot -- but for some reason I prefer (at least for now) the Kel-Tec. That may change as I shoot the CM9 more... Were I faced with the choice of a Kel-Tec PF-9 and the Ruger LC9, the Ruger is a more attractive weapon. Functionally, I don't think there's much difference.