Reading far too much into this, guys.
You went from her assertion of a self-endowed right to her using deadly force against someone for "ridicule, bias, discrimination and judgment from those who disagree with [her] stand or are simply uneducated and ignorant of the facts about gun ownership, self-defense, and safety."
As for the other part where she asserts a right against intimidation -- if that intimidation is a guy standing over her with a ball bat, or other threatening device, she should use whatever force is necessary to stop that intimidation.