The Firing Line Forums - View Single Post

Scattergun Bob · January 12, 2009, 01:10 AM

I totally agree with zippy13, this test IS flawed. Actually A lot of LE departments have conducted very serious testing on all areas of scattergun performance and pellet terminal ballistics.

I do not have a links to share that type of data with you all, This is as close to real as I can find on the Internet. If someone has a better site, PLEASE, give it up!

I have stated before, there is much wrong with the testing protocols of "box of truth" however, it is 100% better than rumor and myth. And I tip my hat to Old Painless for his effort.

January 12, 2009, 01:10 AM	#15
Scattergun Bob Senior Member Join Date: February 29, 2008 Location: Nine Mile Falls, Washington Posts: 1,186	I totally agree with zippy13, this test IS flawed. Actually A lot of LE departments have conducted very serious testing on all areas of scattergun performance and pellet terminal ballistics. I do not have a links to share that type of data with you all, This is as close to real as I can find on the Internet. If someone has a better site, PLEASE, give it up! I have stated before, there is much wrong with the testing protocols of "box of truth" however, it is 100% better than rumor and myth. And I tip my hat to Old Painless for his effort. __________________ First, with the most, WINS! Regards, Scattergun Bob Last edited by Scattergun Bob; January 12, 2009 at 11:01 AM.